-
The Wisdom of Psychopaths
In this engrossing journey into the lives of psychopaths and their infamously crafty behaviors, the renowned psychologist Kevin Dutton reveals that there is a...
Read More »
A former colleague of mine—whose name shall not be spoken, neither for joy nor strategy—was so transparently boastful of his tissue-thin associations with “famous psychologists” that I found him, well, rather unlikable as a result of it. Not only did he name-drop at every possible opportunity, but just in case you missed the reference to So-and-So popping up in the conversation about, say, lactose intolerance or Frisbee golf, his office was also visually booby-trapped to produce the same effect. Like some groupie at a rock concert, he’d capitalized on the many photo-ops at various academic conferences so that these grinning photos showed him with his arms draped around a virtual Who’s Who of accommodating (and usually slightly befuddled, or at least mildly inebriated) star scientists.
Why is it that we find “name-dropping” and related behaviors so unappealing in others? Similar to many other social behaviors, the phenomenon of name-dropping is one of those human foibles that is so routine and commonplace that scientists have almost completely overlooked it as a potentially fruitful topic of investigation. An exception to this was a study published earlier this year in the journal Social Influence. In this study, University of Zurich psychologists Carmen Lebherz, Klaus Jonas and Barbara Tomljenovic conducted a controlled experiment in which participants were introduced to a stranger who name-dropped to various degrees. The volunteers were then asked to rate this stranger on several key dimensions.
First, however, Lebherz and her colleagues “operationally defined” the central construct of name-dropping, because simply mentioning a respected person’s name doesn’t necessarily make you a “name-dropper.” If your cousin happens to be a famous actress, or your English professor won a Pulitzer, there might well be instances where it’s considered appropriate to mention his or her name, especially if someone asks you about the connection. Thus, the authors declare that:
We understand name-dropping in our study as an unprompted association with another individual or group; that is, the self-presenter volunteers his/her association to a positive other [Editor’s note: a “positive other” is someone held in especially high esteem by other ingroup members] as opposed to being asked about his/her association by somebody else.
Because the study took place in Zurich, the experimenters decided to use the name of a well-liked national figure, and Roger Federer fit the bill perfectly. The authors write:
In Switzerland, the Swiss tennis star is a revered national hero, adored for both his undisputed confidence and unpretentious demeanor. We expected that an ordinary student’s strong association with such an idol would be perceived as such an obvious attempt to impress, would be discounted as manipulative, and thus would cause less liking of the name-dropping individual.
The participants in the name-dropping experiment were 141 students from the University of Zurich. Each was misled to believe that they would later be participating with a partner—a complete stranger—as part of a study on sports behavior. For now, though, they were to simply exchange a few introductory pleasantries through email. (In actuality, of course, there was no other person on email, just the experimenter sending the participant a pre-scripted message). The students were randomly assigned to one of four “name-dropping conditions” in which the fictitious same-sex partner either: (1) didn’t mention Federer at all; (2) mentioned he (or she) was a fan of Federer; (3) claimed to be a personal friend of Federer, or; (4) claimed to be both Federer’s personal friend and workout buddy. Thus, all participants would have read the following email from their new study partner, “Michael”:
Hello ______,
I’ve signed onto that study in which we have to email and introduce ourselves before participating in the sports study. I’m Michael, I’m 24, I share an apartment in Zurich with some former schoolmates and I have just started studying Psychology. So far I like it quite well. I also work part time at the airport, I push wheelchairs and take kids to their flights, stuff like that. It’s fun!
Let’s get started on hobbies and sports, that’s what it’s about, right? Well I’m making an effort to stay in form. :) I like playing Badminton, in the winter I go snowboarding and in the summer I sometimes play beach volleyball at the lake. Besides that I of course follow the sports events in the media.





See what we're tweeting about




10 Comments
Add CommentShouldn't that be "So I Says to Roger Federer, I says..."? ;)
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI would want to see an authoritarian and political spectrum analysis matched to this as well. For some personality types connection to a higher positive person, elevates themselves in their minds (and if faking it, lowers it in the minds of others).
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisSuch superiority games are more frequent and open in authoritarian mindsets, and those of the conservative spectrum.
Those who are offended by name-dropping probably just don't know anyone famous. Otherwise they would reciprocate rather than get pissy. I had a celebrity poke with a rock chick 30 years ago and just about the only person who knows is my wife, and she teases me about it. People also don't like narcissists, which are very similar to name-droppers.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAnd the king of name droppers is: oh, how I hesitate to mention the name! I must! Richard Hoagland. Hands down. 'Tissue-thin'? The man defined it.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisHe's entertaining as hell, though.
Jesse...your articles on boobs and penises get a lot more response. I guess name-dropping isn't very controversial. Sex certainly is.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI personally find the question of why name-dropping behavior is offensive more interesting. Why is arrogance, egotism, name-dropping and such a serious social offense, relegating the offender to a social purgatory? My thought is that because the listener senses a threat of sorts to their own self -honoring, but I'd like to see some good empirical work here. And is my lumping together arrogance, egotism, and name-dropping appropriate in this context?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisMy first guess as to why name dropping is offensive is that it is seen as both a form of bragging and social cheating. First the name dropper is intimating that they are more important than you because they know so and so. Second they are expecting special treatment based on this connection. They are in a sense "cheating" as they did not earn whatever makes so and so important but are trying to trade on it socially based on no more than their association.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWhen we know someone is the friend of an important personage we do not have the same reaction we may feel envious but it actually makes them more interesting. It is only when they are trying to trade on that association for some sort of personal gain.
Also humans are very sensitive to social cues. If someone throws a reference into a conversation with a premeditated goal in mind or forces a conversation in a direction that allows them to name drop a discord or feeling of something artificial will ring warning bells in the mind of the listener. Usually when that happens it is because someone is lying, so the name dropper may be perceived as dishonest. (The same result may happen any time a conversation is artificially re-directed to enable one speaker to brag about something or insert a comment designed to make them seem more learned or accomplished.)
It's not that hard, people. Name-dropping is an obnoxious and transparent attempt at garnering cheap ego boosts and praise from others. And you have to ask why it turns people off?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI, being a close personal friend of Roger Federer, would have known immediately that Michael wasn't truly a friend. LOL! I wonder how much the dislike of the name dropper stems from jealousy. If someone is a big fan of Roger Federer then they might be jealous of this relationship and choose to dislike Michael because of it.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI, being a close personal friend of Roger Federer, would have known immediately that Michael wasn't truly a friend. LOL! I wonder how much the dislike of the name dropper stems from jealousy. If someone is a big fan of Roger Federer then they might be jealous of this relationship and choose to dislike Michael because of it.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this