Cover Image: April 2012 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

First of Our Kind: Could Australopithecus sediba Be Our Long Lost Ancestor? [Preview]

Sensational fossils from South Africa spark debate over how we came to be human















Share on Tumblr



New human species from South Africa—Australopithecus sediba—has been held up as the ancestor of our genus, Homo. Image: Brent Stirton/Getty Images

In Brief

  • The origin of our genus, Homo, is one of the biggest mysteries facing scholars of human evolution.
  • Based on the meager evidence available, scientists have surmised that Homo arose in East Africa, with Lucy’s species, Australopithecus afarensis, giving rise to the founding member of our lineage, Homo habilis.
  • Recently discovered fossils from a site northwest of Johannesburg, South Africa, could upend that scenario. The fossils represent a pre­viously unknown species of human with an amal­gam of australopithecine and Homo traits that suggest to its discoverers that it could be the ancestor of Homo.

Sometime between three million and two million years ago, perhaps on a primeval sa­vanna in Africa, our ancestors became recognizably human. For more than a million years their australopithecine predecessors—Lucy and her kind, who walked upright like us yet still possessed the stubby legs, tree-climbing hands and small brains of their ape fore­bears—­had thrived in and around the continent’s forests and woodlands. But their world was changing. Shifting climate favored the spread of open grasslands, and the early australopithecines gave rise to new lineages. One of these offshoots evolved long legs, toolmaking hands and an enormous brain. This was our genus, Homo, the primate that would rule the planet.

For decades paleoanthropologists have combed remote corners of Africa on hand and knee for fossils of Homo’s earliest representatives, seeking to understand the details of how our genus rose to prominence. Their efforts have brought only modest gains—a jawbone here, a handful of teeth there. Most of the recovered fossils instead belong to either ancestral australopithecines or later members of Homo—creatures too advanced to illuminate the order in which our distinctive traits arose or the selective pressures that fostered their emergence. Specimens older than two million years with multiple skeletal elements preserved that could reveal how the Homo body plan came together eluded discovery. Scientists’ best guess is that the transition occurred in East Africa, where the oldest fossils attributed to Homo have turned up, and that Homo’s hallmark characteristics allowed it to incorporate more meat into its diet—a rich source of calories in an environment where fruits and nuts had become scarce. But with so little evidence to go on, the origin of our genus has remained as mysterious as ever.


This article was originally published with the title First of Our Kind.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.
Rights & Permissions

4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. oldgreywolf 04:14 PM 3/20/12

    Excellent article, excellent possibilities; however, something that the good Dr.(?) Berger should bear in mind is that, when he was born, Ramapithecus was touted as a direct lineal ancestor to the Homo line, due to physiology. But, stating A. sediba as a potential member of Homo is a good idea, unless the evidence overwhelmingly says otherwise. Either way, a great find, and a lucky one. Hope to hear more about these sites as time goes on.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. ErnestPayne 05:59 PM 3/20/12

    Thus Spoke Zarathustra ran through my mind.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. TWirth 11:46 PM 3/21/12

    9 year old boy, Mathew Berger, may be Best Archeologist on planet. The discoverer was Dr. Berger's son, not the good Dr.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Falcon41 11:50 PM 12/22/12

    If it can be verified via examination and analysis, this would be exciting!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

First of Our Kind: Could Australopithecus sediba Be Our Long Lost Ancestor?: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X