TIGHT QUARTERS: Opponents of offshore fish farms warn that the practice could harm wild fish and pollute the oceans with waste and extra fish food.
Image: FLICKR/KENNETH HONG
-
The Best Science Writing Online 2012
Showcasing more than fifty of the most provocative, original, and significant online essays from 2011, The Best Science Writing Online 2012 will change the way...
Read More »
With a deadline looming for approval of a federal plan that would open the Gulf of Mexico to deepwater fish farming, House lawmakers and conservationists are plotting strategies to block such offshore ventures until Congress creates a system to regulate them.
Democratic Rep. Gene Taylor (Miss.) introduced legislation last Friday that would prevent the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and regional fishery management councils from permitting offshore aquaculture under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Management Act. The measure would invalidate existing permits and put future proposals for offshore fish farming on hold until Congress passes new legislation to oversee deepwater aquaculture.
The legislation has a powerful ally in Natural Resources Chairman Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.), whose panel oversees fisheries issues. Rahall was one of three original co-sponsors of the bill. Environmental groups Ocean Conservancy and Food and Water Watch have also endorsed it.
The debate over whether to allow fish to be raised in deepwater nets and cages has heated up since a fishery management council approved what would be the first large permitting system earlier this year. The council used its authority under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Management Act to make the decision in late January.
The gulf fisheries council developed its plan after lawmakers failed to advance a national permit system that the Bush administration pushed over the past three years. Rahall and other lawmakers rejected the Bush administration's proposal for not including enough safeguards for the environment and native fish.
Advocates for fish farming say aquaculture would take pressure off wild stocks, enhance recreational fishing opportunities and create new jobs in the United States, where about 80 percent of consumed seafood is imported -- about half of it raised through aquaculture. The gulf council has predicted that the plan would permit between five and 20 offshore operations in the next 10 years, producing up to 64 million pounds of seafood.
But before going forward, the gulf proposal must be approved by the Commerce Department. The public comment deadline for the decision ends today, and the department is expected to make a decision in the coming weeks.
NOAA has representatives on each fishing council, and most council actions receive approval from the agency.
But marine advocates have been hoping that NOAA might take a different course for the offshore fish farms. Conservationists maintain that such farms could harm the environment, put native fish at risk and pollute oceans with fish waste and excess food. The plan has been criticized by more than 100 environmental and fishing organizations.
If any offshore aquaculture program is to go forward, marine advocates and Capitol Hill Democrats have said it should be a nationwide permitting system with well-defined environmental safeguards -- which they think the gulf plan is lacking.
Commerce Secretary Gary Locke has said the Obama administration would like to create a national permitting system for offshore fish farms in an effort to create jobs and help feed a nation that currently imports most of its seafood. But Locke and NOAA Administrator Jane Lubchenco have indicated that if the administration went forward with a national plan, it would include environmental standards.
In a 2007 article in the journal Science, Lubchenco endorsed a report from a blue-ribbon panel that recommended a strict regulatory system to govern offshore operations. And at her confirmation hearing last winter, the marine scientist-cum-government administrator said that scientists and policymakers have not yet identified the "right conditions under which aquaculture is sustainable."
But Lubchenco has not indicated what she intends to do about the gulf council's plan.
"I think the issues are who should be making the rules, who should be in charge, and we haven't yet worked through those issues in this administration," Lubchenco said in an interview last month.
See what we're tweeting about
6 Comments
Add CommentIt is highly unlikely that such fish farming will take the pressure off stocks of wild fish . Man is far too greedy to be reasonable unless forced to change by strong legislation and punishment...
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAgreed, the cheaper fish gets, the more we (I) will eat...
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisi practically know nothing about the topic, but it's an interesting debate. i think it'd likely take pressures off stocks of wild fish, if the economy has anything to say about it. knowing that foreign fishers own 80% of the american seafood market, it's easily deduced that they're doing something right (when considering profit margins and net costs). so if american companies began to use the fish farms, it'd drive the market value of fish down even further (something traditional boat fishers are already having a hard time competing with currently, it appears). when the value drops, the more expensive methods become irrational, and it would only become rational to fish in the wild as a supplier for rare "caught in the wild" delicacies. greed, i'm afraid, has absolutely nothing to do with the debate.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI just wish I could trust government agencies more... Clearcutting forests and turning them into tree farms was always promoted as "best practices", we were told we could have the hydropower systems AND salmon. At least the dead zone in the Gulf is smaller this year, although do the agencies really know why? Convince me that we won't be damaging already damaged ecosystems and yes, I will buy farmed fish and seafoods. I already do, I just don't know how much damage (if any) the fish farms are doing... just farther away from home (or not yet in my backyard).
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisyou don't think overfishing wild stocks would be far more detrimental?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisCome on! Not again, factory farming in any way has only proved to be the wrong choice. When are we going to realize that we must clean-up and take care of our natural systems to feed us. I have read article after article about how bad farm/factory raised fish are for other countries and now that we have over fished, over polluted and over built or natural systems we think we can do this better. We can never do better than what natuer has been doing for thousands of years. I am not suggesting I have all the answers but we already know this is not the right choice. How about spending some money cleaning up and rebuilding the natural systems from the Mississippi drainage all the way into the gulf of Mexico, that would create thousands of jobs and the result would be a cleaner, healthier, more abundant natural ecosystem that will be around long after the "farm" goes out of business.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this