Easy Flyer: A Land/Air-Capable Motorcycle May Be in the Offing

A California company hopes to sell a build-it-yourself kit by 2011














Share on Tumblr


Whereas small planes use more fuel per hour of operation, they also tend to arrive sooner at their destinations than cars do because they travel more or less in straight lines and, at least so far, traffic is lighter.

The flying motorcycle's body is also designed to be more environmentally friendly than a car's, given that the Switchblade exterior will be made of self-reinforced (and technically, recyclable) polypropylene—aka "number 5" plastic on food containers—whereas the frame will be steel tubing.

"From a scientific point of view, it is definitely possible to build an aircraft that can also negotiate a highway," says C. Nataraj, chair of Villanova University's mechanical engineering department.

Still, any reasonably complex system is optimized to do one thing, Nataraj says. Samson is trying to build one vehicle that does two complex tasks: safely transport people on crowded streets as well as in the air. Design and functional compromises would almost certainly have to be made to accommodate those twin missions, he adds.

There is a robustness to even civilian aircraft that is absent from cars, because, for the most part, a car breakdown entails pulling over. "If you get a ding in your door, no problem," Nataraj says. "Get a ding in your wing, and you will not be flying."

General aviation pilot and flight instructor Jeffrey Geibel of Belmont, Mass., says a craft like the Switchblade would have to be maintained per stringent FAA standards.

None of this is lost on Bousfield, and, like many a pioneer before him, he is pushing onward and upward. His next step will be wind-tunnel testing. An FAA-approved prototype is expected by year-end. And after that, the rest could possibly be personal transportation history.


A LEGACY OF AERO-BIKING

It's nearly impossible to definitively ascertain a "first" when it comes to small flying machines, especially flying motorcycles.

  • There's a vintage silent film, apparently lost to the ages, of someone putting rockets and stubby wings on a bike. It didn't work.
  • Evel Knievel put two wheels on a rocket and tried to jump his X-1 Skycycle across Idaho's Snake River Canyon in 1974. It didn't work—spectacularly.
  • The Butterfly, LLC, has been producing flying three-wheel motorcycle kits since 2007. Its Butterfly Super Sky Cycle looks like the unlikely offspring of an old traffic helicopter, a go-kart and an Everglades airboat.
  • Moller International debuted its prototype M400 Skycar, another trike, three years ago. The Skycar has promised innovations not least of which is vertical takeoff and landing. A peek at the Skycar's sleek body confirms that someone at Moller has watched a lot of Star Wars movies.


25 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Macrocompassion 11:32 AM 1/5/10

    You seem to have forgotten Urban Aero VTOL projects and products. see: www.urbanaero.com

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. slaven41 12:32 PM 1/5/10

    Here's another one: http://terrafugia.com/ .
    Lot's of flying car companies. No flying cars.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. joeldooris 01:07 PM 1/5/10

    Humm, is it time for me to trade in my VTX?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. taerog 01:32 PM 1/5/10

    Heh and there will not be any flying cars any time soon . . with a still over stressed air control and the "threat" of flying bombs and accident dropping them on people. I can't see these ever becoming common till they are totally computer controlled and navigated. . and even then . .

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. taerog 01:33 PM 1/5/10

    Heh and there will not be any flying cars any time soon . . with a still over stressed air control and the "threat" of flying bombs and accident dropping them on people. I can't see these ever becoming common till they are totally computer controlled and navigated. . and even then . .

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. drafter 02:29 PM 1/5/10

    Alright Sam, I hope the best of Luck to your project

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. drafter 02:31 PM 1/5/10

    Alright Sam, I hope the best of Luck to your project

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. rockjohny 02:51 PM 1/5/10

    with such tiny wings, if it lost power it would fall like a rock...you'd need some glide capability built in, no?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. JamesDavis 03:22 PM 1/5/10

    At $65,000.00 for just the hull and you have to put it together yourself, I don't think he will sell too many - if any. He should've made it to look like the one on Star Wars.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. JimEdits 06:17 PM 1/5/10

    Nope, I saw terrafugia and urbanaero. They're supposed to be flying cars. This is supposed to be a flying motorcycle.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  11. 11. JimEdits 06:19 PM 1/5/10

    Nope. I saw terrafugia and urbanaero. They're cars, though. I was writing about flying motorcycles. Scientifically speaking, flying motorcycles are confirmed signs that the Mayan calendar is write and we're doomed.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  12. 12. cuchullainn 06:26 PM 1/5/10

    Great steps forward in aviation. We need Next Gen Air Traffic control systems ASAP if these vehicles will have any chance of taking to the airways in 2012. At $65K to avoid traffic jams! If this works then this is a winner.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  13. 13. jgrosay 06:23 AM 1/6/10

    Very interesting concept. This kind of vehicle is perfectly suited for a Wankel rotary engine, that has less weight, smaller size, reduced vibrations and tend to have less breakdowns, and these almost never catastrophic,there are several in the market with the power needed for this byke-plane. The issue in the concept is the airfield and airways saturation, you may find these personal aircrafts disturbing airports the way gooses do, and having trouble when entering, for example, the swirl induced by a big airplane. I would really like flying one, if I knew how to fly anything

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  14. 14. tregaron 12:14 PM 1/6/10

    If this makes it beyond the drawing board into full-scale production, the manufacturer will clean up!
    Given that the product is not just 'hot air' it is more likely that they will be 'absorbed' by a larger outfit who will have the capital to produce and market the machine globally.
    But don't you just love these guys doing what others just dream about. It's what made the US the last bastion of capitalism.
    Orville and Wilbur live on!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  15. 15. tregaron 12:15 PM 1/6/10

    If this makes it beyond the drawing board into full-scale production, the manufacturer will clean up!
    Given that the product is not just 'hot air' it is more likely that they will be 'absorbed' by a larger outfit who will have the capital to produce and market the machine globally.
    But don't you just love these guys doing what others just dream about. It's what made the US the last bastion of capitalism.
    Orville and Wilbur live on!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  16. 16. Quinn the Eskimo 02:38 AM 1/7/10

    Yup! Any day now.

    --charles kuralt 1964

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  17. 17. Dimitris 11:54 AM 1/7/10

    In vintage scifi, 2010 was often featured, and one of the most common features was flying cars of some sort. It was the future, and now we say "happy 2010" and I have to ask "dude, where's my jetpack?"

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  18. 18. craigrides 01:53 PM 1/7/10

    Is this Popular Science or Sci Am?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  19. 19. Naught 06:05 PM 1/7/10

    Hells Angels with wings? Gimme shelter!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  20. 20. rickofudall 06:17 PM 1/7/10

    As a pilot, aircraft mechanic, and Experimental Aircraft Assoc. member, I sincerely hope the flying ground vehicle never comes to pass and I have no reason to believe it will. First, how many of you drivers are willing to take six hours of testing to get a license, not to mention several hundred hours of study and practice?
    Second, how many of you have the good sense to know when NOT to fly? As the article states, if you have a problem you don't just get to pull off the road. We're over 100 years into the air age and the three biggest killers of pilots are still, continued flight into deteriorating weather, failure to manage the fuel supply, and failure to fly the aircraft in an emergency. If pilots, who do take all the testing, instruction, and practice still have trouble with these three basic things, how do you think the average driver is going to do?
    Third, how many Lexus owners would be willing to shell out $65K plus another $25K for engine and avionics if what they got to take home from the dealership was a moving van full of boxes of parts, a binder full of drawings and instructions, and the hope that in several hundred to several thousand hours of building they'd be able to drive to the coffee stand for a latte?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  21. 21. markpeaty in reply to drafter 10:41 AM 1/8/10

    I think with one of these things, assuming it CAN fly, a parachute capable of deploying in less than five seconds will be a must-have.

    I saw a science news items some years ago showing just such a parachute deploying from the top of a Cessna in flight. It worked but you would really want your seatbelt fastened!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  22. 22. markpeaty in reply to rickofudall 11:01 AM 1/8/10

    rickofudall, you are right of course - for the moment. Considering that most human individual transportation can be safely and effectively accomplished with buses and bicycles [I have commuted by bike for three decades now] it begs the question: " Who needs to travel that fast anyway?"

    But that said, I think it is only a matter of time before improvements in material strength per unit mass, and in computerisation of flight controls, will enable this all to happen. The trick will be to forget about "cars that can fly" because cars are stupid anyway. Making small flying machines more bird-like and bat-like [not to mention pterodactyl-like] and giving them a capability of folding down into an enclosed motor bike format will do the trick. They will of course need "trainer wheels" for going slowly but control of those, and control of just about everything else except choice of destination, way points, and start time, will need to be performed by the intelligent systems of the "bird brain".

    It's gonna happen!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  23. 23. sonofanel 02:14 AM 1/12/10

    The perfect power supply for a vehicle like this would be a small fusion reactor as both technologies have been just a decade or two away for over 50 years now.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  24. 24. WolffAerocycle 09:49 AM 1/21/10

    http://wolffaerocycle.com/

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  25. 25. WolffAerocycle 09:49 AM 1/21/10

    adam@wolffaerocycle.com

    http://wolffaerocycle.com/

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Easy Flyer: A Land/Air-Capable Motorcycle May Be in the Offing

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X