STATUS SYMBOL: New research indicates that the brain can encode a value for social status and that it can compare the reward from being socially important with winning money.
Image: © ISTOCKPHOTO/ANJA PETERNELJ
-
The Wisdom of Psychopaths
In this engrossing journey into the lives of psychopaths and their infamously crafty behaviors, the renowned psychologist Kevin Dutton reveals that there is a...
Read More »
New research shows for the first time that we process cash and social values in the same part of our brain (the striatum)—and likely weigh them against one another when making decisions. So what's more important—money or social standing? It might be the latter, according to two new studies published in the journal Neuron.
"Our study shows that both behaviorally and in the brain, people place an importance on social status," says Caroline Zink, a postdoctoral fellow in neuroscience at the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) in Bethesda, Md., and co-author of one of studies. "It's hugely influential even [when we're not] in direct competition with someone else."
Zink's NIMH team and their counterparts at Japan's National Institute for Physiological Sciences (NIPS) used different methods to determine that we process social values in the striatum, which had previously been tapped as our brain's monetary reward center. This is key, researchers say, because it provides evidence that our brains consider a good rep—as well as cash—to be rewarding and worth considering as we mull our options. In addition, they note that our brains likely weigh the benefits of each against one another (because they are processed in the same place) as we make up our minds.
"Although we intuitively know that a good reputation makes us feel good, the idea that a good reputation is a 'reward' had long been just an assumption without scientific proof," says Norihiro Sadato, a neuroscience professor at NIPS and a co-author of the Japanese study.
Sadato and colleagues conducted fMRI scans of the brains of 19 subjects while they engaged in two different exercises. The first task was a simple game in which participants had to choose one of three cards in the hope of winning a cash prize. In the second game, fictional evaluators appraised volunteers' characters based on the results of personality trait questionnaires. The researchers found that the striatum activated in response to high and low appraisals (but did not perk up to more neutral comments); it also responded to monetary wins and losses but was quiet if a player broke even.
"The implication of our study is that the different types of the reward are coded by the same currency system,'' says Sadato, "enabling the comparison between them."
In the NIMH study, researchers scanned the brains of 72 volunteers as they attempted to earn money in a computer game. During play, the researchers occasionally revealed how supposed competitors (who, unbeknownst to them, were fake) were faring. The scientists created an arbitrary ranking system of the real and faux players in which some of the bogus gamers appeared to perform better—and others worse—than the real ones. The participants were told that their status in the game had no effect on how much money they could win, but that earning more money could boost their rank.
"We found that the brain reacts very strongly to the other players and specifically the status of the other players," Zink says. "We weren't expecting that profound a response," she adds, noting that the subjects seemed to be concerned with the hierarchy within the game even when it was of no consequence to how much money they could make.
According to Zink, the striatum became just as animated when players were given a shot at improving their social standing as it did when they won a buck. And that wasn't the only indicator that they cared about how others perceived them. She says another brain region (the medial prefrontal cortex) involved in sizing up others went wild when players were shown photos of competitors who outperformed them.
Other findings of the studies: brain areas that process emotional pain (the amygdala and posterior cingulate) lit up when players failed to answer questions that inferior competitors had aced. The researchers speculate that this is because they were worried it would diminish their reputations as superior players. They found that the brain's emotional centers were most active in competitive players who messed up, indicating that they were so concerned with their reputations that they became stressed out when their reps were threatened.
"Our position in social hierarchies strongly influences motivation as well as physical and mental health," said Thomas Insel, director of the NIMH, in a press statement. He notes that this new insight into how the brain processes social standing may have important public health consequences, possibly even paving the way to new stress-reduction therapies.
See what we're tweeting about
6 Comments
Add Commentbrain is so complex
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisMy son is a game-player and has built his own computer to play with and he is very successful and this gives him status. For a child who was knocked unconscious on the school playground when he was 7 (what is now recognized as a traumatic brain event) and never was successful at school (the decision of the school was that the family was dysfunctional) especially since the TBI was never put in his school records, he has at last been able to feel good about himself.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisMs Kate Sisco
fMRI is the new phrenology. We use our feet to dance when we are happy and we use our feet to kick dogs when we are angry. So what does that tell us? Nothing other than that we use our feet for many activities. Watching areas of the brain light-up, areas far too large to show meaningful ultra-microscopic neural activity is just a party game. The practice invites the creation of just-so stories and a mythology about brain imaging. This is not a fit topic for Scientific American.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisReading this reminded me of the silly games some people play. I once had a boss that never let me forget his desk was 2 inches bigger than mine. To save time I once answered "his phone". He was absolutely livid, and suggested something absolutely horrible would happen to me if it ever did it again. He didn't particularly like my "so what" look on my face either!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisMoney and status are both variants of safety and this research is not so specific that it merits the use of more specific terms than just "safety", especially in the USA, where even basic humane understanding of the term is lacking to the detriment of poor people, working or not.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI think is not surprising that social stimuli were stronger rewards than money, since social stimuli are primary reinforcers (product of evolution) and money is an secondary reinforcer (acquired trough learning). On the other hand is important to remark that one of the money functions is provide social status!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this