For Women in Climate Sciences, a Struggle to Find a Voice

Beset by subtle biases, women are struggling to find their place in academia, with consequences for all of us















Share on Tumblr

WoPhy 2011 Conference for Undergraduate Women in Physical Sciences. Whereas 34 percent of all geosciences doctoral degrees are awarded to women, just 8 percent of top faculty jobs in the field are held by women." data-pin-do="buttonBookmark">

A promotional picture for the Conference for Undergraduate Women in Physical Sciences. Whereas 34 percent of all geosciences doctoral degrees are awarded to women, just 8 percent of top faculty jobs in the field are held by women. Image: J. Paxon Reyes/Flickr

In surprising numbers, women in climate science in particular and the physical sciences in general are abandoning academic careers. 

The reasons are as varied as the individuals - some leave for maternity issues or other family pressures, others give up in the face of subtle gender bias within the academic world. And others feel there are better platforms than a university position to apply the science they love and to speak out to a broader audience, with greater impact.

Regardless of the cause, the female brain drain from the academy has an impact on climate science, say researchers. A 2008 study found that while 34 percent of all geosciences doctoral degrees were awarded to females, women comprised only 8 percent of top-ranking geosciences faculty positions at U.S. colleges and universities.

Scientific inquiry is surely at stake, said Mary Anne Holmes, a mineralogist at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and former president of the Association for Women Geoscientists.

"Women may have a different way of asking questions about the science and communicating the consequences," Holmes said.

Studies have shown that groups make better choices when group members have diverse experiences and points of view, Holmes noted. It's not that women look at the data and see some big feminine question that's not being asked or that men don't ask good questions, she added. Men "just don't ask all the questions." 

Environmental scientist Amy Luers found the nonprofit setting more fitting than academia for her career goals. "I wanted to be at the intersection of science, policy and action," she said.



1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. M Tucker 02:21 PM 11/6/12

    "Both male and female faculty members rated the male applicant as significantly more competent than the identical female applicant. They also selected a higher starting salary and more career mentoring for the male applicant."

    That’s a pretty f’ing amazing result! More opportunity and a higher salary, it’s still a man’s world. I wonder if those women are also going to vote against their own best interests just like the majority of middle-class, married women have show a propensity to do. Male domination supported by female acceptance. What more could men want? And here they were all freaked out by feminists, Gloria Steinem, the women’s liberation movement.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

For Women in Climate Sciences, a Struggle to Find a Voice

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X