Click here for full-size image" data-pin-do="buttonBookmark">
CLASSICAL VIEW portrays a black hole as an infinitely dense point (a singularity), which draws in matter such as stars, and an event horizon, which marks the point of no return. But in a black hole regarded as a ball of dark energy (a "gravastar"), infalling matter disintegrates at the dense shell.
Image: SAMUEL VELASCO
-
The Best Science Writing Online 2012
Showcasing more than fifty of the most provocative, original, and significant online essays from 2011, The Best Science Writing Online 2012 will change the way...
Read More »
Demolishing stars, powering blasts of high-energy radiation, rending the fabric of spacetime: it is not hard to see the allure of black holes. They light up the same parts of the brain as monster trucks and battlebots do. They explain violent celestial phenomena that no other body can. They are so extreme, in fact, that no one really knows what they are.
Most researchers think of them as microscopic pinpricks, the remnants of stars that have collapsed under their own weight. But over the past couple of years, a number of mavericks have proposed that black holes are actually extended bodies, made up of an exotic state of matter that congeals, like a liquid turning to ice, during the collapse. The idea offers a provocative way of thinking about quantum gravity, which would unify Einstein's general theory of relativity with quantum mechanics.
In the textbook picture, the pinprick (or singularity) is surrounded by an event horizon. The horizon is not a physical surface, merely a conceptual one, and although it marks the point of no return for material plummeting toward the singularity, relativity says that nothing special happens there; the laws of physics are the same everywhere. For quantum mechanics, though, the event horizon is deeply paradoxical. It allows information to be lost from our world, an act that quantum theory forbids. "What you have been taught in school is almost certainly wrong, because classical black hole spacetimes are inconsistent with quantum mechanics," says physicist George Chapline of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
The new conceptions of black holes eliminate the event horizon altogether. The basic idea is that there does, in fact, exist a force that could halt the collapse of a star when all else fails. That force is gravity itself. In matter with certain properties, gravity switches from being an attractive force to a repulsive force. Such a material, going by the name "dark energy," is thought to be driving the acceleration of cosmic expansion.
Last year physicists Pawel O. Mazur of the University of South Carolina and Emil Mottola of Los Alamos National Laboratory reasoned that a pocket of the stuff might freeze out, like ice crystals, during the collapse of a star. The result, which they call a gravastar, would look like fried ice cream: a crust of dense but otherwise ordinary matter stabilized by a curious interior. The crust replaces what would have been the event horizon.
Another proposal goes further. It conjectures not only that dark energy would freeze out but that relativity would break down altogether. The idea comes from a dark-horse contender for quantum gravity, the proponents of which are struck by the resemblance between the basic laws of physics and the behavior of fluids and solids (also known as condensed matter). In many ways, the equations of sound propagation through a moving fluid are a dead ringer for general relativity; sound waves can get trapped in the fluid much as light gets trapped in a black hole. Maybe spacetime is literally a kind of fluid.
What makes this approach so interesting is that the behavior of condensed matter is collective. The details of individual molecules hardly matter; the system's properties emerge from the act of aggregation. When water freezes, the molecules do not change, but the collective behavior does, and the laws that apply to liquids no longer do. Under the right conditions, a fluid can turn into a superfluid, governed by quantum mechanics even on macroscopic scales. Chapline, along with physicists Evan Hohlfeld, Robert B. Laughlin and David I. Santiago of Stanford University, has proposed that a similar process happens at event horizons. The equations of relativity fail, and new laws emerge. "If one thinks of spacetime as a superfluid, then it is very natural that in fact something physical does happen at the event horizon--that is, the classical event horizon is replaced by a quantum phase transition," Chapline says.?




See what we're tweeting about




2 Comments
Add CommentTO MAZUR and GEORGE CHAPLINE of University of california
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThis paper researched by me may help your superfluid vacuum theory for solve gravity and other problems.
from subirsengupta2012@gmail.com
My Contradictory Concepts about
The Correct Descriptions of Nature
If our daily life is cyclic, if all planets, stars or galactic systems are cyclic and continually changing their appearance over time, then due to basic law of physics to be same always in any reference frame, our universe has a probability to be cyclic transformation with positive time arrow. But previous, present or future universe may not be exact same due to little disorders in local space/time. There is no singularity. Big bang only represent as a junction of change the mode of appearance (from past universe to future universe). After Big Bang explosion elementary hot & cold detectable and non detectable wave (matter) as a localisation of vacuum energy density evolved from vacuum fluctuation via spontaneous symmetry breaking the universal primery symmetry, where that field most probably was an anisotropic inhomogeneous nonlinear torsion tensor spinor field interact against its opposite field gave rise to an effective negative pressure in the course of evolution of fermi-mass via 4-component interactable Dirac spinor field. Now those elementery matters create little gravitational contraction into local space/time along with continually over all rapid acceleration and dropping vacuum energy density along with maintaining thermodynamic rules appear as an aparent flat universe.
i LIKE TO SEND THE WHOLE PAPERS TO FOR FURTHER RESEARCH,
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisMY WAY OF EXPLANATION MAY NOT PROFESSIONAL but the subject give you a new dimension to search the universal truth.