Cover Image: May 2012 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Slight Genetic Variations Can Affect How Others See You

Unspoken cues communicate which type of "trust hormone" gene we have














Share on Tumblr



A micrograph view of crystallized oxytocin. Image: Alfred Pasieka/Photo Researchers, Inc.

When we meet new people, we assess their character by watching their gestures and facial expressions. Now a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA suggests that those nonverbal cues are communicating the presence of a specific form of a gene that makes us more or less responsive to others’ needs.

The gene determines which type of receptor a person has for the hormone oxytocin. Oxytocin has been implicated in a variety of positive traits, such as trust, empathy and generosity. The hormone is detected by our body’s cells via their oxytocin receptors. In a past study, psychologist Sarina Rodrigues Saturn of Oregon State University and her collaborators found that people who have a certain variation of the receptor gene are more empathetic than those with the alternative form of the gene.

In the new study, Saturn and her team showed volunteers 20-second silent video clips of individuals who were listening to their romantic partner recount an upsetting experience. The study participants watched for nonverbal behaviors, such as head nods and smiles, and rated every individual on a number of character traits. Those with the form of the oxytocin receptor gene associated with empathy were judged by the volunteers as being more trustworthy, compassionate and kind than those with the alternative form of the gene.

“These slight genetic variations do have a big impact on not only how you feel internally but also how people perceive you,” Saturn says, adding that impressions based on nonverbal cues can help individuals quickly choose compatible friends or romantic partners. 

This article was published in print as "Genetic Gestures."


Buy This Issue
If your institution has site license access, enter here.
Rights & Permissions

Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

Follow Us:

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American MIND

  • melanietbaum If there ARE sex diffs, women always seen as effect to be explained. It's "Why are women high in X?" not "Why are men LOW in X?" #aps2013dc
    23 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite
  • lindy2350 Nothing irks me more than a spokesman saying it's "my duty" to "direct people" to think/act a certain way. Does he know what journalism is?
    41 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite
  • melanietbaum Berdahl: It used to be you could see "sex" or "gender" in title & the main finding might be that there's no diff. Not anymore. #aps2013dc
    55 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite
More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Slight Genetic Variations Can Affect How Others See You: Scientific American Mind

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X