GM Resurrects Its Electric Car (with Tweaks)

With the unveiling of its new electric concept car--the Chevrolet Volt-- GM resuscitates an electric car program that died with the canceled EV-1















Share on Tumblr



THE CHEVY VOLT concept vehicle, General Motors' new electric vehicle platform, is the first of a series of planned models that will be powered by electric propulsion systems. The Volt is an electric vehicle that uses a gasoline engine "assist," which recharges the battery, making it a kind of hybrid. Image: ¿ General Motors

The recent documentary film Who Killed the Electric Car? roundly criticized General Motors Corporation for prematurely quashing production and further development of the EV-1 electric car, a battery-powered, two-seat commuter vehicle that managed to gain a small but enthusiastic fan following before the program's termination in 2003. The EV-1's main drawbacks, according to GM, were insufficient driving range (less than 150 miles) and overly slow battery recharging times (eight hours). "EV-1 owners hated having to plan their lives around recharging the car's battery pack," recalls Tony Posawatz, a vehicle line director for GM.

Those disadvantages are expected to be surmounted by what some might regard as the EV-1's successor: the Chevrolet Volt concept car, a battery-powered electric vehicle designed primarily for short-distance travel that is equipped with a small internal combustion engine and generator to recharge the battery. The newly unveiled Volt's lithium ion battery pack, which will power the four-seat compact for about 40 miles per charge, will also be able to be replenished with cheap off-peak power by plugging it into the nationwide electric grid overnight.

Although the Volt concept, which is being introduced today at Detroit's North American Auto Show, is a kind of hybrid vehicle, the design emphasizes electric battery rather than gasoline engine operation. The new design features no direct mechanical link between the gas-powered engine and the electric drive train. After noting that the engineering for the production model is underway, GM spokesmen refused to predict exactly when it might hit showroom floors. "The pacing of the project depends on further development of the lithium ion battery," states the program's chief engineer, Nick Zielinsky. Besides providing greater power density than current batteries, the new cells must also last for 10 years and 4,000 operating cycles.

Drive power for the Volt will come from a 136-kilowatt- (or 160-horsepower-) at-peak permanent-magnet electric motor that produces 320 newton-meters of torque, Zielinsky explains. The car's 16-kW, advanced lithium ion battery pack is expected to take about 6.5 hours to recharge (from a minimum 30 percent charge level to a maximum 80 percent charge state). The battery will also serve as a storage medium for a regenerative braking system that will recoup braking energy that is otherwise lost to friction.

A small, fuel-efficient gasoline engine--a one-liter, three-cylinder, turbocharged power plant--and a 53-kW generator set will recharge the battery on the fly, he continues. A 12-gallon fuel tank will give the Volt a 640-mile driving range (calculated using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's urban driving cycle) that will permit drivers to make long trips without re-upping the battery frequently. GM engineers are said to be developing a quick-charge capability as well.

Top (continuous) speed is to be 100 miles per hour with peak velocity at 120 mph, Zielinsky says, adding that much of the engineering know-how behind the car's electric system--the traction motor, power electronics and so forth--was developed for the company's hybrid and fuel cell vehicle programs, and further back, for the EV-1.

The Volt's "distinctive" design is based on the Chevy Cobalt compact vehicle architecture, he says. The "rather large" (100-plus-liter) battery will sit in the car's central tunnel where it packs well, finds protection from crash impacts and can readily be integrated with the cooling system. Zielinsky notes that its compact power train system allows the wheels to be positioned near the corners of the chassis, which makes for short front and rear overhangs and a wide track, yielding an overall layout that resembles that of a rear-wheel-drive car.

The Volt's high-mileage hybrid power train is aimed to appeal to customers who are increasingly interested in fuel savings, whether for environmental or economic reasons, or to reduce oil imports, according to Posawatz. "One half of U.S. households drive less than 30 miles a day and 78 percent of work commuters travel 40 miles or less each day," he says. Many drivers in the former category will thus use little or no gasoline at all. Compared with a typical, 30-mile-per-gallon automobile, the Volt will save these motorists about 500 gallons of fuel a year, which also will result in a substantial cut in annual carbon dioxide emissions which are associated with climate change. Most daily commuters in the 40-mile-a-day classification will get the equivalent of 150 mpg in a Volt, he concludes.



8 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Mommy Wallace 06:45 AM 12/2/07

    If there is a movie , who revived the electric car, it won't be GM. Even though, the Prius isn't an electric car but a hybrid, I believe Toyota will be known as the auto maker to have made the choice to spend the money on research and development of the Prius for consumers. They didn't lease them to consumers, squash them because consumers like them and feared they wouldn't buy the rest of their gas guzzling inventory. Alas, I hope the Volt falls on it's butt, I hope GM does too and the retirees and employees get every dime they deserve before hand.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. ElectricJack 12:33 AM 1/22/08

    I believe this to be the greatest development since sliced bread and the ONLY possible way to energy independence. Go GM and the US Gov. should be giving 3 times the incentives for this development than it ever gave for oil drilling and production.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. angelobue 03:23 PM 12/22/08

    Steven Ashley's article reads like a press release and fails to accurately represent the important implications revealed by the documentary, "Who Killed the Electric Car."

    To watch the film see:

    http://watch-free-movies.org/documentaries/who-killed-the-electric-car.html.

    For a description of GM's weak rebuttal see:

    http://www.naturalnews.com/021135.html.

    There are more politics here than meet the eye, and a responsible journalist would have written a more balanced story. This is important because the management who misrepresented the history of the events related to the EV-1, and who downplayed the revelations of the documentary is the same management which drove the company into its present financial crisis and had to be shamed into a more cooperative posture during the Congressional hearings. IN my opinion, GM doesn't need new press releases, it needs new management with less hubris.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. E. Bruce 02:24 AM 1/3/09

    the ONLY way an electric car, or at least one driven with an electric motor, will ever be mass produced is if GM does it. Remember, "So goes GM so goes the world". My actual favorite electric car is the Teslar. This a true totally electric car. If I just had the $102,000 to buy it! The "Karma" is also good. It looks exactly like the GM concept Volt. But it is $80,000 and on back order until 2011! Unfortunatly only GM can make an electric car in large enough volume to catch on. I just wish they had kept the concept design.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Iagree in reply to angelobue 01:59 PM 4/8/09

    You're right. The EV1 had a rather large waiting list when they took the cars back from consumers and crushed them all (which they were able to do because the cars were only available through lease). There were many protests against car companies' discontinuation of plug in vehicles. This technology was more than enough for almost all Americans' daily commutes when first introduced. Just think of how much they could've been improved if they had continued making them until now, 13 years later. If you ask me, I think oil companies had a lot to do with the EV's disappearance.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. pgtruspace 12:01 AM 8/13/09

    Today's PR says that the Volt gets 240 mpg city EPA rated. ( as long as you don't drive over 40 miles a day) Hell if you don't drive over 40 miles per charge just throw away the engine /generator set and get better performance and mileage.
    Only Government Motors can afford to sell an electric car at a price that a normal person can afford to pay.
    No matter what the volume an electric car costs twice as much to build as a fuel engine car.
    Only the well to do can afford to buy an electric car because they don't have to borrow at a costly rate to buy or lease the car. Cost of operation pay back takes too long to work for most people.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. genge 02:50 PM 12/6/10

    i wonder if future versions will incorporate flexible solar panel technology into their body work ?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. genge 02:50 PM 12/6/10

    i wonder if future versions will incorporate flexible solar panel technology into their body work ?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

GM Resurrects Its Electric Car (with Tweaks)

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X