Good Riddance to Mosquitoes: Four Ways to Beat the Malaria-Carrying Threat

Lasers, parasites and other methods could help prevent a disease that afflicts hundreds of millions of people















Share on Tumblr



BLOOD LUST leads mosquitoes to bite--and spread diseases. Image: USDA

More In This Article

Editor's note: This story is part of a series of online exclusives about natural phenomena and human endeavors we'd like to see come to an end. They are connected with the September 2010 special issue of Scientific American called "The End".

Mosquitoes that carry the Plasmodium parasite cause some 300 million cases of malaria every year, claiming one million lives. That's a lot of carnage generated by an insect smaller than a pinky fingernail—but if enterprising researchers have their way, their blood-thirsty assault won't continue much longer. Here are some of the most promising strategies for wiping out malaria-carrying mosquitoes:

  • Zap 'em. This February, inventor Nathan Myhrvold of the investment firm Intellectual Ventures unveiled a Star Wars-inspired mosquito killer: a laser death ray. Myhrvold mounts LED lamps on a fence post and uses a sensor called a charge-coupled device to monitor the field of light they create. When a disturbance in the field indicates the presence of an insect, a nonlethal laser beam is fired to determine how quickly the insect's wings beat—a trait that reliably distinguishes one species from another. Only female, malaria-bearing mosquitoes get zapped with the powerful kill laser (their wings beat at a low frequency); other insects are allowed to escape unharmed. "This is the first example of a smart insecticide," Myhrvold says. "If you sprayed, you'd kill all kinds of bugs."
  • Fight parasite with parasite. Scientists at Imperial College London have experimented with using microsporidian parasites to keep malaria-bearing mosquito populations in check. When adult mosquitoes are infected with these fungi, they live shorter lives and their larval offspring are less likely to survive, devastating populations over time. Because the parasites evolve in tandem with the mosquitoes, subtly changing their attack strategies in response to the mosquitoes' attempts to develop resistance over time, this method would continue to be effective even as mosquito populations evolve new defenses.
  • Practice good breeding. Johns Hopkins University researchers have devised genetically modified mosquitoes that express a protein known as SM1, making them immune to the Plasmodium parasite. If these GM skeeters can outcompete their wild counterparts, malaria-bearing mosquitoes could find themselves a casualty of human-directed evolution.
  • Attack on two fronts. When mosquitoes evolve resistance to commonly used chemical pesticides, pest-eradication gurus have to look elsewhere for solutions. One effective alternative is the fungus Beauveria bassiana. A 2009 study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences indicates that although B. bassiana spores can kill malarial mosquitoes in their own right, the spores also make mosquito hosts more susceptible to death by pesticide application—a devastating one-two punch.



8 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. JamesDavis 01:09 PM 8/19/10

    I like the laser one. That would be entertaining while you sit outside at night watching it kill those pesky things.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. tichead 06:59 PM 8/19/10

    Smoke 'em with a ray gun. That is cool! I hope the moment of demise is very dramatic.

    The 'Beauveria bassiana' is another story. It attacks almost all flying and a lot of crawling insects, and being spread by contact, is particularly effective against colony insects, like bees, which already have enough problems.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. frgough 11:10 AM 8/20/10

    DDT. Problem solved. Oh. Wait. That's right. Rachel Carson's junk science book still has people thinking DDT is the end of life on the planet.

    Environmentalism. Responsible for millions of dead children all over the world.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. JOHNCWILLIS 04:14 PM 8/20/10

    Eradication could have devastating consequences:
    -- The food chain is permanently changed
    -- Possibly effecting myriad number of insects, animals and plants
    Improved breeding through genetic modification appears safer after a cursory examination

    The star wars concept is probably the safest from an environmental point of view:
    -- we only kill creatures that are nearby and thus a threat
    -- we don't effect the food chain

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. wxv6 04:25 PM 8/21/10


    There was a good article in nature about this a little bit ago:
    http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100721/full/466432a.html

    The Nature article notes that "females of some species need a meal of blood to get the proteins necessary to lay eggs." Why not add a gene for the synthesis of the necessary egg-laying protein to those mosquitoes that lack it. This may be easier said than done, if a mosquito nectar-only diet simply doesn't contain the proper elements for the protein's synthesis. But if feasible, then Mosquitoes won't have to feed on blood to lay eggs.

    Even if blood feeding is a genetically regulated behavior (i.e. instinct), then it would only take a few generations for that behavior to be selected out, since blood-feeding often results in squished mosquitoes, whereas the few that "choose" to lay eggs without feeding (but rather, with their new protein synthesis capability) would not risk getting swatted.

    This allows mosquitoes to continue their important duties in the ecosystem and liberates us blood reservoirs from their tyranny. Not only the malaria risk but also the nuisance of the itch.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. ekeyme 09:49 PM 8/30/10

    Like the laser one too. & afraid of that the bio-chemo-sections may led to somewhat unknown ecodangers like the supper resistance

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. jstof 02:08 PM 9/21/10

    There are around 3500 known species of mosquito, yet less than 5% of those species are capable of transmitting any disease to humans. So, conspire to get rid of all mosquitoes? Uh, another bad idea.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. jstof in reply to jstof 02:13 PM 9/21/10

    Sorry! I responded too quickly, without sufficient thoughtfulness. Yes, these could be helpful for controlling disease-bearing species.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Good Riddance to Mosquitoes: Four Ways to Beat the Malaria-Carrying Threat

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X