Mind in Pictures | Mind & Brain Cover Image: September 2012 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Neurobiology of the Placebo Effect



Mind in Pictures: Hard to Swallow

 

Dwayne Godwin is a neuroscientist at the Wake Forest University School of Medicine. Jorge Cham draws the comic strip Piled Higher and Deeper at www.phdcomics.com.

 

 

 

16 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. marclevesque 10:00 AM 9/15/12

    The placebo effect is also shown to correlate with activity in the prefrontal cortex, the anterior cingulate, (the nucleus accumbens), the amygdala, periaqueductal gray matter, and even in the spinal cord.

    The following quotes are from the review : Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Peter C Gøtzsche, 2010

    "We did not find that placebo interventions have important clinical effects in general. However, in certain settings placebo interventions can influence patient-reported outcomes, especially pain and nausea"

    "Variations in the effect of placebo were partly explained by variations in how trials were conducted and how patients were informed."

    "The effect on pain varied, even among trials with low risk of bias, from negligible to clinically important."

    "Meta-regression analyses showed that larger effects of placebo interventions were associated with physical placebo interventions (e.g. sham acupuncture)"

    [ http://www.cochrane.dk/research/Placebo%20interventions%20for%20all%20clinical%20conditions%20(Cochrane%20review).pdf ]

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. RSchmidt 12:17 PM 9/15/12

    This highlights one of the major challenges of modern medicine. Modern medicine is focused on making patients get better while complementary health care such as acupuncture and therapeutic touch focuses on making patients feel better. That is why people are so easily fooled. Most people base their health on the way they feel so if something makes them feel good, it must make them healthy. I think it is important for modern medicine to address a patient's feeling of well-being or risk losing that patient to snake-oil-salesmen who offer them a happier but shorter life.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Neosteo 01:54 PM 9/15/12

    It is a shame that the theory of placebo effect is actually based on studies that use things such as sugar pills that are in fact active placebos. They induce an endorphin effect on the brain due to its opioid properties.

    There is far too little regulation on to what can be deemed a placebo or not and there are countless studies that have used active placebos which kinda voids the results of the study.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. ldobehardcore in reply to Neosteo 02:03 AM 9/16/12

    Exactly *How* does 50mg or 100mg or even 1 gram of sugar affect the opiate system? Where's *YOUR* research? Care to link?

    Of all the studies I've read, the only evidence that sugar can have an obvious effect on the psychology of humans is that 10 grams of *Fructose* administered shortly after consumption of ethanol slightly reduces or delays ethanol's intoxicant effect. If anything, glucose, being an energy carrying nutrient should have an effect on the dopaminergic mesolimbic pathway in the brain, since consuming sugar is rewarding to the entire body!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Neosteo in reply to ldobehardcore 02:30 AM 9/16/12

    To get you started...
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placebo
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_placebo

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. albertoeraso 12:11 PM 9/16/12

    this is a short vision, placebo vision of placebo issue!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. aldarwin 11:34 AM 9/17/12

    FYI Control subjects do not take actual "sugar" pills ... the placebo resembles the actual medication in every way except it contains no active ingredient.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. aldarwin 11:37 AM 9/17/12

    Belief in a religion is a placebo. You can say it has fooled a lot of people or you can say it has helped a lot of people ... take your choice.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. rajnish 11:58 AM 9/17/12

    God is placebo.
    Beauty is placebo.
    Love is placebo.
    And what is the difference between an automaton and a living person even Life is placebo.
    So if you want to live don't use logic.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. rajnish 12:14 PM 9/17/12

    One should however always be wary of thugs who can use this effect for their own profit making and thus they need to be kept in check.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  11. 11. Neosteo in reply to aldarwin 12:30 PM 9/17/12

    Why call it a sugar pill then? misleading is it not? It is a sugar pill and that is why they call it as such.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  12. 12. rshoff 05:04 PM 9/17/12

    The placebo effect does not work for me. I look for more meaning results than feeling a little moral boost. And I would be extremely angered if treated with placebo. Furthermore, it's misleading and will be misused by doctors. It provides doctors with another excuse not to believe the patient. And it provides an excuse for a myriad of ancillary and tertiary care providers (e.g., acupuncture, aroma therapy, etc) to dip into our healthcare insurance dollars. Although there may be a marginal statistical significance to the placebo effect, it's dangerous and expensive to introduce it into our medical care philosophy.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  13. 13. TAdams 03:33 AM 9/19/12

    If 'science' knew what the placebo was there would be no debate. Science will never know the way science goes about things today.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  14. 14. ssm1959 04:55 PM 9/19/12

    The placebo effect is real and is useful on occasion in the clinical setting. Usually the most responsive patients have other serious psychiatric issues which need to be dealt with making the use of placebos ethically questionable. If placebos are used as a bridge to get the patient to deal with the organic issues I have no problem with them. However when patients are placed on the merry-go-rounfd of maximal cash extraction all the while letting the real problems go unaddressed, the use of placebos is malpractice.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  15. 15. ssm1959 05:38 PM 9/19/12

    The placebo effect is real and is useful on occasion in the clinical setting. Usually the most responsive patients have other serious psychiatric issues which need to be dealt with making the use of placebos ethically questionable. If placebos are used as a bridge to get the patient to deal with the organic issues I have no problem with them. However when patients are placed on the merry-go-rounfd of maximal cash extraction all the while letting the real problems go unaddressed, the use of placebos is malpractice.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  16. 16. albertoeraso 10:20 PM 9/28/12

    este hombre ni es buen dibujante ni entendio el efecto placebo, es mas es un nocevo !

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Neurobiology of the Placebo Effect: Scientific American Mind

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X