Harnessing Robots to Study Inaccessible Arctic

New robots undergoing field tests could expand scientists' access to polar regions and improve understanding of climate change


Climatewire













Share on Tumblr

Yeti also carried an onboard computer and signal processing board, a ground-penetrating radar and an ultra-precise GPS to plot its path forward and map small ice ridges, called sastrugi, that resemble tiny frozen sand dunes.

"We're just trying to prove a robot is able to collect data humans would collect," Lane said, a few hours after he and Lee landed on the ice sheet and unpacked Yeti from its travel crate. "Our goal is to use autonomous robots to drag a variety of scientific equipment."

Over the next seven days, the two engineers' work was cut short by bad weather and altitude sickness, but Ray, who supervised their work on Yeti over the past year, said she's happy with the robot's progress. Yeti was able to execute a "square wave" pattern of repeating north-east-north-west turns and aced test trips of 3 to 4 kilometers.

Charging ahead, 24 hours a day
That experience will aid Ray's team as they develop an improved version of Yeti's solar-powered sibling, Cool Robot, which they believe is more suited to collecting data for scientists studying the poles.

"It can drive as long as the sun is up, and in the polar regions in summertime, the sun is up 24 hours a day," Lever said. "So you can considerably extend the reach of science parties out into the continent [of Antarctica] or onto the Greenland ice cap by using a robot that's solar-powered."

The researchers hope to send Cool Robot on a long test journey in 2013, perhaps to accompany NSF's annual supply trek across Greenland's ice. To prepare, they're redesigning Cool Robot's solar panel box to make it lighter and reshaping the robot's overall profile to help it resist being overturned by strong winds.

"Our goal is for any scientist that needs to collect data to be able to borrow one of these robots, or buy one," Lane said. "They can go day and night at the same speed. They don't make errors like humans do."

Still, the team behind Yeti Robot and Cool Robot doesn't think that its rovers -- or other machines -- will ever completely supplant humans at the poles.

"I don't think we'll ever replace scientists in the field," Lever said. "The intention is to expand their reach."

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500


Climatewire

3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. hotblack 12:09 PM 8/3/11

    Where robots are involved, pictures of said robots should always be shown.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. timbo555 05:57 PM 8/3/11

    What's the point? all they're going to find up there is and endless ocean filled with dead polar bears.....

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. benchod 07:43 AM 8/4/11

    Why use resources for pointless research ? Why not spend time and energy improving our country , help the needs than develop robots , increase cost etc...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Email this Article

Harnessing Robots to Study Inaccessible Arctic

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X