
Today palm oil production is the largest cause of deforestation in Indonesia and other equatorial countries. Pictured here: A swath of Indonesian rainforest already cleared (foreground); Another swath being prepared by burning (background).
Image: Netaholic13, courtesy Flickr
-
The Best Science Writing Online 2012
Showcasing more than fifty of the most provocative, original, and significant online essays from 2011, The Best Science Writing Online 2012 will change the way...
Read More »
Dear EarthTalk: Is it true that palm oil, common in snack foods and health & beauty products, is destroying rainforests? If so, what can consumers do about it?
-- Emma Miniscalco, via e-mail
It’s no wonder that worldwide demand for palm oil has surged in recent years. Long used in cosmetics, palm oil is now all the rage in the snack food industry, since it is transfat-free and therefore seen as healthier than the shortening it replaces.
But to produce palm oil in large enough quantities to meet growing demand, farmers across Southeast Asia have been clearing huge swaths of biodiversity-rich tropical rainforest to make room for massive palm plantations. Today palm oil production is the largest cause of deforestation in Indonesia and other equatorial countries with dwindling expanses of tropical rainforest. Indonesia’s endangered orangutan population, which depends upon the rainforest, has dwindled by as much as 50 percent in recent years.
The clearing of these forests is a big factor in global warming, given how much carbon dioxide (CO2) trees store when left alone. Once forests are cut, tons of CO2 heads skyward where it does the most harm. Also, when not replaced by palm oil plantations, rainforests help maintain water resources by absorbing rainfall and then releasing it into streams and rivers, thus minimizing flooding and soil depletion.
Simply boycotting palm oil and the products containing it may not help, as reduced demand could force the companies behind the plantations to instead initiate more intensive timber harvesting and a widespread conversion of the land to agriculture, which would add a heavy pollution load onto the already compromised land, air and water. It is up to the countries involved in palm oil production to regulate the industry and budget sufficient funds for enforcement. But with huge profits coming in from the sale of palm oil, public officials in Indonesia and elsewhere are loathe to clamp down on their golden goose.
Several of the largest palm oil producers have joined forces with banks and nonprofit groups to try to green up the industry. In 2003, some 200 commercial entities in the global palm oil supply chain met and established the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) to promote the growth of palm oil in an environmentally friendly manner. RSPO works to develop definitions and criteria for the sustainable production of palm oil, while facilitating the adoption of more green-friendly practices throughout the industry. The group celebrated its first shipment of “sustainable palm oil” to Europe this past November.
Despite progress, many green leaders are skeptical that RSPO has the teeth to make a positive impact on the fast-growing palm oil industry. Greenpeace International considers RSPO to be “little more than greenwash,” pointing out that at least one RSPO-certified producer—United Plantations, a supplier to Nestlé and Unilever—is deforesting Indonesia’s vulnerable peat land forests. And Sinar Mas, another major RSPO player, has cleared tropical rainforest all over the country for its palm oil plantations, and is still expanding rapidly. Greenpeace is calling for a moratorium on deforestation throughout Indonesia so that the RSPO and the government can take stock and then proceed accordingly.
CONTACTS: RSPO, www.rspo.org; Greenpeace, www.greenpeace.org.
EarthTalk is produced by E/The Environmental Magazine. GOT AN ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTION? Send it to: EarthTalk, c/o E/The Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881; submit it at: www.emagazine.com/earthtalk/thisweek/, or e-mail: earthtalk@emagazine.com. Read past columns at: www.emagazine.com/earthtalk/archives.php.




See what we're tweeting about




3 Comments
Add Commentwe need the forest,and more important we need to control ourselves.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIf you want a good company that doesn't use palm oil, go to Lush. They have soaps, shampoos, lip balms, fragrances, among many other things, and they've stopped the use of palm oil in all of their products.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWe also need to feed the world! And how about the millions of poor people living for under 1US per day in Indonesia? Are they not allowed to reach out for a better future and education for their children, which they can only attain if they get a job? The country has not many other options. United Plantations were the first to get RSPO certified. www.rspo.org. You need to live up to 127 sharp criterias in order to obtain this certification. They have only developed secondary jungle for land use and have seet aside 35% of their land to jungle conservatories. Sustainable practices have to be beneficial to both people and planet. United Plantations rebutted Green Peace's accusations within hours from release of their critical report: http://www.unitedplantations.com/UP's%20%20Response%20to%20Greenpeace.pdf Would they be able to do so, if they did not have real and good intentions for a sustainable development? I think we need to start looking at both sides of the coin, the fact is that we cannot and should not stop the development in the developing countries. They also have a right to a better future.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this