Cover Image: September 2009 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Head Lines: Men Are Choosy, Too

Also: Pack Your Bags for Creativity and Confidence Wins over Smarts














Share on Tumblr



SPEED DATING: Speed dating gives researchers a way to study who is choosier--men or women? Image: iStockphoto

  • The Wisdom of Psychopaths

    In this engrossing journey into the lives of psychopaths and their infamously crafty behaviors, the renowned psychologist Kevin Dutton reveals that there is a...

    Read More »

Men Are Choosy, Too
In numerous studies of speed dating—a rapid-fire matchmaking tool that has men hop from table to table for quick encounters—women have proved choosier than the guys about whom they flag for a second date. Ladies must be picky because they invest more in their offspring, according to the oft-repeated evolutionary theory. But when researchers made the simple switch of having women do the table hopping while men stayed seated, the two sexes suddenly became equally choosy, suggesting social norms and physical cues play an underappreciated role in mate choice. Read more in the October issue of Psychological Science. —JR Minkel

Pack Your Bags for Creativity
Ernest Hemingway and Pablo Picasso were on to something: a recent study suggests that by living abroad artists may be fueling their creativity. Researchers from the French business school INSEAD and Northwestern University studied responses from subjects in five separate experiments, finding that those who had lived abroad—and had adapted to a nonnative culture—more consistently showed innovation and creativity in negotiations, in the use of ordinary items, and in drawings. More research is necessary to discern if an already creative person benefits more from living abroad than a noncreative one does or if the noted higher levels of creativity are permanent. —Elizabeth King Humphrey

Confidence Wins over Smarts
Speaking up counts more than competence in becoming a leader
When a group of people works to complete a task, a leader usually emerges. New research shows such leaders are not necessarily more intelligent than the other group members, but rather they simply speak up more often. Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, gave groups of college students 45 minutes to lay the groundwork for a business and then asked the students to rate one another on intelligence, judgment and other traits. The students believed that the people who spoke more often were the smartest in each group—even when, during another group exercise involving math problems, they offered more incorrect answers than did others who were less talkative. Those who did not say much were judged as averagely intelligent and not so creative. A later look at the participants’ SAT scores revealed that, on average, the leaders had the same scores as the rest of the group. “The main reason dominant people took charge is they jumped in first and nobody questioned what they said,” says psychologist Cameron Anderson, who led the study. “Dominant people seem really good at things because they speak with so much confidence.” —Robert Goodier


This article was originally published with the title Men Are Choosy, Too.



Buy This Issue
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Extremophile 02:38 PM 10/9/09

    Men Are Choosy, Too

    Of course, men are choosy too. They invest (almost) as much as women do by entering long-lasting, sometimes even lifelong partnerships with women. This was the only way in old times to develop evolutionary fitness in a family situation with less then one offspring per year and over a decade time for the offspring to mature.

    Monogamy or moderate polygyny may have also been an adaptation in times of deseases.

    By the way, I am a man, and I have been very selective.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Windontree 05:02 PM 10/9/09

    For sure one gets choosy if he/she is being 'pursued' (chooser). The 'pursuer' is always instinctively labeled genetically inferior simply because of the aggressive nature of seeking to improve their gene pool.

    Reality gets altered by artificial scenarios people are put into like this study. Our ability to 'choose' genetically matched or superior mates becomes skewed.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. pgtruspace 12:00 AM 10/10/09

    Obama is a prime example of a person who is thought to be brilliant because he never stops talking.
    "mouth open, brain off".

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Extremophile 08:08 AM 10/10/09

    @pgtruspace I am often travelling in the Midle East, and it is surprising how Obama changed their view of the US. And these people are important. They have the oil which we are consuming.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. LogicalPhallacy 02:51 PM 10/11/09

    confidence winning over smarts isn't that much of a revelation. no one wants to side with some one that isn't able to assure others of the promise of success.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. cowboy 12:42 AM 10/14/09

    re confidence wins over smarts supports the old adage:
    "bullshit baffles brains"

    cowboy

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

Follow Us:

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American MIND

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Head Lines: Men Are Choosy, Too: Scientific American Mind

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X