Cover Image: January 2010 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Head Lines: Handwriting Reveals Liars

Also: Stimulating Brain Cells May Be Trickier Than We Thought














Share on Tumblr

Murder, She Wrote
Handwriting analysis may reveal dishonesty
A new study adds “writing with large strokes and applying high pressure on paper” to the list
of telltale signs that someone might be lying. Researchers at Haifa University in Israel could tell whether or not students were writing the truth by analyzing these physical properties of
their handwriting.

Lying requires more cognitive resources than being truthful, says lead author Gil Luria. “You need to invent a story, make sure not to contradict yourself, et cetera.” Any task done simultaneously, therefore, becomes less automatic. Tabletop pressure sensors showed this effect in the students’ handwriting, which became more belabored when they fibbed.

Handwriting analysis could eventually complement other lie detection methods and would add a new dimension because, unlike almost all other techniques, it doesn’t rely on verbal communication, Luria says.
—Nicole Branan

Electric Surprise
Stimulating brain cells may be trickier than we thought
Scientists and doctors have long used electricity to both study and treat the brain. But a report in the August 27, 2009, issue of Neuron indicates that the brain’s response to electricity is exceptionally complex. Using a new type of optical imaging, Harvard Medical School researchers observed neurons as they were stimulated by an electrode. Instead of activating a small sphere of surrounding neurons as expected, the electrodes caused sparse strings of neurons to fire across the brain. The finding suggests that brain surgeons and the designers of neural prosthetics have a much smaller margin of error than previously thought—shifting an electrode even slightly could activate an entirely different set of neurons.
—Melinda Wenner


Buy This Issue
If your institution has site license access, enter here.
Rights & Permissions

19 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. gelunelu 03:12 PM 1/1/10

    A new study adds “writing with large strokes and applying high pressure on paper” to the list
    of telltale signs that someone might be lying. Researchers at Haifa University in Israel could tell whether or not students were writing the truth by analyzing these physical properties of
    their handwriting.
    I think they’re wrong, totally wrong, just the opposite is right.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. candide 10:45 AM 1/15/10

    Handwriting analysis is about as accurate as a polygraph.
    Both can be beaten easily.

    This is a very poor "study" designed, it seems, to re-enforce a pre-existing belief.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. chodgesmith@sbcglobal.net 01:28 PM 1/15/10

    Handwriting analysis is a complex and powerful tool that should be given more credence than the limited arena of Questioned Documents Examiners. Jury selection is one of the few areas that acknowledges the use of experienced graphologists as a tool to understanding the amount of information revealed through our handwriting. Neurologists should be studing more that just micro and macrographia in understanding the link between the motor skills used in writing and our brain synapse.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. JamesDavis 01:37 PM 1/15/10

    Well, that did it. Now I am going to have to give up writing fictional novels...everybody's going to know that they are made up.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. galaxy_man in reply to JamesDavis 02:08 PM 1/15/10

    You might want to try out a wonderful invention called the typewriter. Computers don't lie!

    Oh wait, I guess the researchers forgot that nobody writes documents by hand anymore. Silly researchers.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. silvrhairdevil 02:25 PM 1/15/10

    Good point galaxy-man. I doubt I could write a legible line today. It's easily been 20 years since I stopped writing by hand.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. JamesDavis in reply to galaxy_man 07:18 AM 1/16/10

    You are right again galaxy_man. I totally forgot that it has been 30 years since I wrote my last novel by longhand. I reckon all of them, but that first one, is safe from being recognized as a lie. I was sweating bullets there for awhile.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. abyssalmystery 12:13 AM 1/17/10

    This study also does not account for psychopaths who take more effort to tell the truth.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. hellblade 03:11 PM 1/17/10

    what if someone just has a lot of problems on their mind, and again their handwriting is different. what a poorly conducted study.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. CallanStout 03:15 PM 1/17/10

    They should test this theory on fiction writers - who write by hand - and see what they come up with. Two possible answers 1)there is truth in fiction, when written by talented professional , or 2) good writers are damn good liars.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  11. 11. CallanStout 03:16 PM 1/17/10

    They should test this theory on fiction writers - who write by hand - and see what they come up with. Two possible answers 1)there is truth in fiction, when written by talented professional , or 2) good writers are damn good liars.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  12. 12. CallanStout 03:16 PM 1/17/10

    They should test this theory on fiction writers - who write by hand - and see what they come up with. Two possible answers 1)there is truth in fiction, when written by talented professional , or 2) good writers are damn good liars.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  13. 13. CallanStout 03:16 PM 1/17/10

    They should test this theory on fiction writers - who write by hand - and see what they come up with. Two possible answers 1)there is truth in fiction, when written by talented professional , or 2) good writers are damn good liars.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  14. 14. silvrhairdevil 02:07 AM 1/19/10

    This process only detects the pressure of the writing instrument and deduces lying from that. I can imagine this would be useful in analyzing written statements.

    It is not the same as graphology, the study of letter formations and how they reflect the writer. You could tell from a person's normal handwriting if they have a propensity for lying.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  15. 15. silvrhairdevil 02:11 AM 1/19/10

    You could tell from a person's normal handwriting if they have a propensity for lying.

    Or, for that matter, if they have a vivid imagination.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  16. 16. royniles 04:01 PM 1/19/10

    This "study" doesn't account for the fact that we all use deception to a greater or lesser extent when even deciding how much of the truth is acceptable to tell to others - who may then use it to their or our disadvantage.
    And by the way, these truth seeking graphologists themselves are liars, as they know full well there is little or no truth to be determined from that pseudo "science."

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  17. 17. Wayne Williamson 06:57 PM 1/19/10

    I wonder what they would make of my signature when "doing" bills....yeah i still write some;-)
    Maybe its not all deception but carrying out an unpleasant task...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  18. 18. gudgal 08:00 PM 1/19/10

    Well now that it's out the liars can now fix this problem so they will cosciously write smaller and with less pressure. Then we add another parameter that is if they write slowly then they're lying again.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  19. 19. Jaen 11:27 AM 1/25/10

    To this day I have a callous above the end knuckle of my right middle finger from the death grip I had to have on my pencil to learn to write with my right hand - as was enforced by some teachers years ago. The hard bearing down was simply an artefact of writing with the wrong hand - in a way that's "lying".

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

Follow Us:

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American MIND

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Head Lines: Handwriting Reveals Liars: Scientific American Mind

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X