Editor's Note: This review, by John Holdren, of Power to the People: How the Coming Energy Revolution Will Transform an Industry, Change Our Lives, and Maybe Even Save the Planet, by Vijay Vaitheeswaran (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2003), was first published in our December 2003 issue. We are republishing it because of reports that Pres. Barack Obama has picked Holden as his science adviser. For more by Holden, see "The Future of Climate Change Policy: The U.S.'s Last Chance to Lead."

Energy is the lifeblood of industrial civilization and an absolutely necessary (albeit certainly not sufficient) condition for lifting the world’s poor from their poverty. But current methods of mobilizing civilization’s energy are more disruptive of local, regional and global environmental conditions and processes than anything else that humans do.

This dichotomy defines the core of the energy challenge in the century before us: How can we supply enough affordable energy to permit the billions who are currently poor (and the billions more who will be added to their numbers in the decades ahead) to attain prosperity—and to sustain and expand the prosperity of those already rich—without suffering intolerable damage to the environmental dimensions of human well-being in industrial and developing countries alike?

How difficult will meeting this challenge be? Is the “business as usual” approach—subsidizing fossil-fuel supply and nuclear energy and large hydro projects, maintaining low energy prices to consumers by keeping environmental and political costs “external,” propping up oil supply by every available means—part of the solution or part of the problem? Can the privatization of energy sectors in the developing countries and the restructuring and deregulation of energy sectors in industrial countries be accomplished in ways that provide the economic benefits of competition while still preserving essential public benefits such as the reliability and resilience of the electricity system?

In his book, Power to the People,Vijay Vaitheeswaran tackles these and the other hard questions at the core of society’s energy dilemmas with style, balance and insight. The style is entertaining and accessible. The balance is impeccable—Vaitheeswaran generally lets the most forceful and effective exponents on different sides of the major issues state their case in their own words—but after ventilating the various positions he is not afraid to let the reader know where he comes out. And this is where the insight comes in.

Vaitheeswaran brings to these questions the respect for markets and marketlike mechanisms of a writer for the Economist, the understanding of technology of an M.I.T.-trained engineer, and the sympathy for the plight of the world’s poor of an individual born in India—all of which he happens to be. He also happens to have, in my judgment, a good sense of how to think about—and convey—the interplay of the economic, technological, environmental and sociopolitical dimensions of the energy issue as well as the reasons that the uncertainties afflicting our knowledge of all the dimensions do not add up to a good reason for inaction.

Among the critically important  points about all this that the book convincingly conveys:

—Civilization is in no immediate danger of running out of energy or even just out of oil. But we are running out of environment—that is, out of the capacity of the environment to absorb energy’s impacts without risk of intolerable disruption—and our heavy dependence on oil in particular entails not only environmental but also economic and political liabilities.

5 Comments

1. 1. toothful 09:55 PM 12/18/08

   when they get through, most people won't even be able to afford electricity!

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

2. 2. logicalerror 07:15 AM 12/19/08

   hydrogen powered vehicles are a red herring, wishful thinking put forward by the oil industry because it would make it possible for them to keep, more or less, the same business model as before.. Electricity on the other hand, we already have an infrastructure for it and updating electric power plants is easier than updating millions of cars when new technology becomes available.. as for efficiency, hydrogen, because we have to create it and can't just pump it out of the ground, is basically a battery anyway.. why not actually use.. a battery instead?
   
   As for electricity generation, i'll put my money on (non tokamak) fusion. Anything else just requires too much work to be done in a very very short time..

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

3. 3. jb 06:20 PM 12/20/08

   As for Holdren as pick for Secretary of Energy the jury’s out and will be for a long time. There is no doubt that as a Nobel Laureate he is ahead of the curve in raw intelligence and several steps ahead of pure political appointees of the past.
   
   I have reservations about his application of specialized knowledge and thought process into the broad arena of energy policy. I had plenty of highly gifted engineering professors in college who were helpless outside their own world when common sense was required.
   
   It will take more than credentials make serious inroad into the energy problems facing the world. Jimmy Carter was a degreed nuclear engineer, the only president in recent history with a technical background and even he was unable to make a dent into the enormity of the energy issues that the world is facing – economically, environmentally or politically.
   
   Well here’s to hope!
   

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

4. 4. jburn 07:23 PM 12/20/08

   I like the notion of localized power sources; those that best match a regions specific resources. Some occasional, large centralized project are always going to be necessary.
   
   If you have lots of sun, use it; if you have lots of water, hydroelectric is great. Let's disconnect from those large sovereign nation driven energy solutions, and go towards locally based solutions that keep the money and power, likewise local.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

5. 5. eco-steve 05:26 PM 12/26/08

   Perhaps the biggest progress in energy use will be the war on waste. By definition we need an economy based on economies of energy. Less doing more.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this