Cover Image: April 2012 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Gene Therapy Restores Sight to Three Patients

Gene therapy restores human sight















Share on Tumblr



Image: Getty Images

  • What a Plant Knows

    How does a Venus flytrap know when to snap shut? Can it actually feel an insect’s tiny, spindly legs? And how do cherry blossoms know when to bloom? Can they...

    Read More »

After several years of setbacks, gene therapy is once again yielding promising results. One area in which it is proving its potential is in restoring vision to patients who have been losing it since birth.

Between 2008 and 2011 Jean Bennett, a neuroscientist at the University of Pennsylvania, and her colleagues used gene therapy to treat blindness in 12 adults and children with Leber’s congenital amaurosis (LCA). LCA is a rare inherited eye disease that destroys vision by killing photoreceptors—light-sensitive cells in the retina at the back of the eye. Typically afflicted children start life with poor vision, which worsens as more and more photoreceptors die.

The treatment grew out of the understanding that people with the disorder become blind because of genetic mutations in retinal cells. Once such mutation prevents the production of an enzyme needed to break down retinol, a form of vitamin A, into a substance that photo­receptors need to detect light and send signals to the brain.

In their original study, Bennett and her colleagues treated each of the 12 patients in one eye; six improved so much they no longer met the criteria for legal blindness. In a subsequent study published in February in Science Translational Medicine, the researchers injected functional genes into the previously untreated eye in three of the women from the first group and followed them for six months. The women’s vision in their previously untreated eye improved as soon as two weeks after the operation: they could avoid obstacles in dim light, read large print and recognize faces.

Bennett showed that not only were the women’s eyes much more sensitive to light, their brains were much more responsive to optical input as well. Functional magnetic resonance imaging showed regions of their visual cortex lighting up that had been offline before gene therapy began. Surprisingly, the second round of gene therapy further strengthened the brain’s response to the initially treated eye, as well as the newly treated one, perhaps “because the two eyes act in concert, and some aspects of vision rely on binocularity,” she says.

Bennett thinks the therapy will work even better in younger patients who have not lost as many photoreceptors. The results “really bode well” for restoring meaningful vision to people with LCA and other forms of inherited blindness, Bennett says.

This article was published in print as "Hopeful Vision."



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.
Rights & Permissions

1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. veronaa 12:57 PM 4/29/12

    <<<<Once such mutation prevents the production of an enzyme needed to break down retinol, a form of vitamin A, into a substance that photo­receptors need to detect light and send signals to the brain.>>>

    Should that sentence say, " ONE such mutation"?

    I am only today getting to last month's SA with this month's still aging on the desk.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Gene Therapy Restores Sight to Three Patients: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X