Household Cleaners to be Reformulated to Clean Up California Smog

Kitchen cleaners, glass sprays and other household cleaning products will be reformulated to reduce smog-forming compounds















Share on Tumblr



CLEANING UP CLEANERS: Reformulating household cleaners to reduce smog-forming compounds is the equivalent of removing 500,000 cars from the road. Image: Photo by BrittneyBush, courtesy Flickr

About 2,000 household cleaning products will be reformulated to reduce smog-forming compounds under a new regulation adopted Thursday in California.

The rule will trigger a new, mandatatory wave of “green” products, including window cleaners, general purpose cleaning sprays, degreasers, oven cleaners, metal polishes, furniture sprays, heavy-duty hand soaps and spot removers.

Household cleaners, which contain highly reactive solvents known as VOCs, or volatile organic compounds, are a substantial source of smog. The new standards will reduce emissions by nearly 7 tons per day, which is the equivalent of removing half a million cars from California’s roads.

Mary Nichols, chairman of the California Air Resources Board, said the new rule, adopted unanimously by the board, will require companies to sell cleaners “that are effective but safe for the environment.”

Manufacturers will spend an estimated $50 million to comply with the requirements, which will be phased in over the next three years, according to an air board report. The cost to consumers will range from “no cost or negligible” for glass cleaners to 44 cents for a heavy-duty hand-cleaning soap, according to a board report.

At a hearing in Sacramento on Thursday, manufacturers of the products told the board that they support the new limits even though they will be difficult to achieve.

They are “very aggressive” and will require “very serious and costly reformulation challenges,” said Joe Yost of the Consumer Specialty Products Assn., a trade group that represents companies that manufacture the products. Still, he told the board, “we support most of the VOC limits.”

The state rule is expected to prompt nationwide reformulation of household cleaning products, since companies say it’s often more cost-effective to redesign all products than produce a separate set for California.

Many household cleaners already comply with the new restrictions, which limit the amount of VOCs in the products based on their category. For example, 69 percent of today's general purpose cleaners meet the new limit. For some products, however, it's a bigger challenge; only 10 percent of glass cleaners and furniture cleaners currently have low enough VOC content to comply.

Since the 1970s, California, facing a severe smog problem, has adopted the world’s most aggressive emission standards for a variety of sources, including cars, trucks, consumer products, paints and factories.

Most of the cleaning products already have faced two other rounds of regulation from the California air board over the past 20 years. The earlier rules already have eliminated nearly half of the VOC emissions from California’s consumer products. But they still emit 245 tons per day, or 12 percent of all the VOCs in the state’s air.

California, along with many other states, faces a federal mandate to reduce ozone, the main ingredient of smog, which aggravates asthma, reduces lung function and has other serious health effects.

Carla Takemoto, manager of the air board’s technical evaluation section, said manufacturers are expected to shift to surfactants to replace the VOCs. Found in soaps and shampoos, surfactants are compounds that reduce surface tension when mixed with water, allowing water to do much of the cleaning without strong solvents. They are large molecules, so they have low volatility and don’t contribute to smog, she said.

“We expect to see increased use of surfactant technologies, which we think is a very viable option,” Takemoto said. “Surfactants tend to be more expensive chemicals than some of the other solvents. But because you use such a small amount of them, it’s still pretty cost-effective to use them.”

For some products, however, surfactants don’t work well. A representative of Stoner Inc., which manufactures a product called Invisible Glass, said surfactants leave streaks and haze on windows.



8 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. the Gaul 11:49 AM 11/19/10

    The question, simply, is 'Why does it take a regulation or law to force people/companies to do what is right?' As a society, it has become far too easy to accept or tolerate what is wrong - not just in this industry, but across the board.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Jioklo 02:18 PM 11/19/10

    A better campaign would be to educate people on how you can clean almost anything in your house with vinegar, baking soda and lemon juice.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Soccerdad 10:22 PM 11/19/10

    Here we go again. Even those of us who live in other states will pay more for less effective products thanks to California. Soon we'll be coughing up more tax dollars to bail them out because, even though they want to lead the whole country, they are incapable of running their own state.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Davy in reply to Soccerdad 08:51 AM 11/20/10

    If you're going to cough anything up, wouldn't you prefer it be dollars than sludge? This isn't about California; it's about the air everyone breathes. Try to imagine how much comfort a full wallet will be when you've got lung cancer, if you can.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Badari 03:56 PM 11/20/10

    People have been educating about the wonders of vinegar, baking soda, and lemon juice for years. The fact is, however, that people just don't want to use them, and so campaign would not be nearly as effective in reducing VOCs as regulating industry.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. tobyw276 07:14 AM 11/21/10

    Much of California air pollution is caused by ships, their dirty engines and especially fuel. Very odd that they are not going for the low-hanging fruit, IMHO.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1229857/How-16-ships-create-pollution-cars-world.html

    http://www.postandcourier.com/news/2008/feb/23/pollution_from_ships_big_worry31612/

    <<The air pollution from a single ship can rival what's produced by every vehicle in a small city, and those emissions are linked to acid rain, lung disease and an estimated 60,000 deaths worldwide. >>

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. DInkSinger in reply to tobyw276 09:46 AM 11/21/10

    California has already gone for this "low-hanging fruit". It's regulations for "Ocean-going Vessels within California Waters and 24 Nautical Miles of the
    California Baseline" went into effect on 1 July 2009. The state regulations will remain in effect until proposed regulations for U.S. and Canadian waters go into effect under the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution From Ships, Annex VI. These regulations will extend out 200 miles from the U.S. and Canadian coasts, with a few exceptions.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. Soccerdad in reply to Davy 09:39 AM 11/22/10

    Davy,

    On my list of things to worry about, getting cancer from a household cleaner is about 20,001.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Household Cleaners to be Reformulated to Clean Up California Smog

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X