Cover Image: September 2008 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

How Loss of Privacy May Mean Loss of Security [Preview]

Many issues posing as questions of privacy can turn out to be matters of security, health policy, insurance or self-presentation. It is useful to clarify those issues before focusing on privacy itself















Share on Tumblr



Increasing transparency of traditional personal boundaries in our society, brought on by the Internet, will force people to confront ethical issues that would not have arisen when information was more highly compartmentalized. The fictionalized personal profiles given above illustrate this point. If they genuinely applied to the people shown and were posted online, some thorny ethical issues would emerge. Image: Mark Clemens (photoillustration); Richard Nowitz National Geographic Collection (crowd scene)

In Brief

  • Erosions of privacy are often better understood as other kinds of harms.
  • "Loss of privacy” may really be a loss of security.
  • Much (though not all) anxiety about genetic privacy would go away if medical care were affordable to everyone.
  • Citizens should have the right to monitor and post information about the activities of government and government officials.
  • People are gaining effective tools to control what personal information they want to give out and to whom.

More In This Article

Privacy is a public Rorschach test: say the word aloud, and you can start any number of passionate discussions. One person worries about governmental abuse of power; another blushes about his drug use and sexual history; a third vents outrage about how corporations collect private data to target their ads or how insurance companies dig through personal medical records to deny coverage to certain people. Some fear a world of pervasive commercialization, in which data are used to sort everyone into one or another “market segment”—the better to cater to people’s deepest desires or to exploit their most frivolous whims. Others fret over state intrusion and social strictures.

Such fears are typically presented as trade-offs: privacy versus effective medical care, privacy versus free (advertising-driven) content, privacy versus security. Those debates are all well worn, but they are now returning to the fore in a way they did not when specialists, insiders and die-hard privacy advocates were the only ones paying attention.


Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

2 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. CARose 09:27 AM 8/19/08

    Is it possible to prevent yourself from being struck by a cosmic ray? If you ride in a transportation vehicle is it possible to prevent being involved in an accident? Why would it be possible to prevent identity theft or other loss of privacy?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. DavGMZ67 11:40 PM 9/10/08

    In regards to a persons health, and genetic determination as to whether they should pay more for health insurance. This sounds to me as the making of a techno Genecide by those with wealth, and technical prowess against peopel who are not technicaly informed or knowledgeble, and are amongst the poorest of the global populations.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

How Loss of Privacy May Mean Loss of Security: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X