Cover Image: February 2013 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Where Few Trees Have Gone Before

As the climate warms, forests encroach on meadowland















Share on Tumblr

Jefferson Park, Oregon, climate change

Jefferson Park, Oregon Image: COURTESY OF HAROLD S. J. ZALD Oregon State University

In perhaps the slowest invasion in history, mountain meadows in the Pacific Northwest—where hikers and backpackers revel in breath-taking scenery—are gradually giving way to hemlocks, Pacific silver firs and other conifers. In these high-elevation, subalpine meadows of Jefferson Park in the central Cascade Range in Oregon, snow typically covers the meadows until July or August and returns again in November or December—too short a growing season for most trees to take root. But with a warming climate, snow has begun melting earlier and growing seasons have lengthened; that extra time with little or no snow cover has given trees a boost. As a result, tree occupation rose from 8 percent in 1950 to 35 percent in 2008, reports a U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service–funded study published last October in Landscape Ecology.

At a time when so many forests are threatened, aren't more trees something to celebrate? Not necessarily, say the authors of the new study. These tall trees block light that meadow grasses, shrubs and wildflowers need to survive. Once trees become established, the surrounding seed banks of native grasses tend to fade away. The meadows' “biodiversity value is much larger than the amount of area they occupy,” explains lead author Harold S. J. Zald, postdoctoral research associate at Oregon State University, who hatched the idea for the study while backpacking in the Cascade Range. The researchers do not yet know which plant or animal species would be endangered.

The scientists did find one bright spot: depressions in the landscape carved out by glaciers held deeper snow that lasted longer through the summer. Such indentations might hold important reservoirs of meadow species even as global temperatures rise, Zald says.

To gather data, the researchers pinpointed study plots with GPS, counted trees by species, measured snow depth in late July, and sleuthed back through time by taking tree core samples to determine their age. Using LiDAR data—“basically laser beams sent down from an airplane,” Zald explains—the team created a precise, three-dimensional map of vegetation, rock and soil, helping the researchers understand where trees became established and how deep the snow was over the rugged landscape.

Although there is still much to learn, the study highlights yet another impact of climate change. “Over the past 20 years in the Pacific Northwest, we've been focused on conservation of old-growth forests as well as conservation of species such as the spotted owl and salmon,” Zald says. “But in the process, we haven't really paid attention to meadow decline. Moving forward, this may be an emerging conservation issue.”



This article was originally published with the title Where No Tree Has Gone Before.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.
Rights & Permissions

5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. podboq 09:24 AM 2/12/13

    I'm really getting burned out on this type of article...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. lamorpa in reply to podboq 10:25 AM 2/12/13

    ...but not really, since your read it and comment.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. ErnestPayne 04:38 AM 2/15/13

    How much will the shift to forest from meadow impact water retention and soil development? Can anyone point me in the direction of any recent studies / articles? Thanks. ernestpayne32@hotmail.com

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. G. Karst 11:41 AM 3/4/13

    No mention of the old dead trees further up, at higher elevations. You know... when the climate was warmer. GK

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. podboq in reply to lamorpa 06:33 PM 3/4/13

    shut yur face cow

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Where Few Trees Have Gone Before: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X