Cover Image: August 2012 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

How Senescent Cells Spur Aging and Cancer [Preview]

Cells that permanently stop dividing have long been recognized as one of the body's defenses against cancer. Now they are also seen as a sometime culprit in cancer and a cause of aging















Share on Tumblr



CELL SIGHTING: Investigators identify senescent cells—those that have lost the ability to divide—by their color. They turn blue when exposed to a particular chemical.

Image: Anatomy Blue

In Brief

  • Senescent cells—which have permanently lost the ability to divide—were once assumed to contribute to aging by undermining tissue repair. Cells were thought to enter senescence to avoid becoming cancerous when damage put them at risk of proliferating uncontrollably.
  • Later, the notion that senescent cells play a part in the aging of tissues and bodies fell out of favor. More recently, though, that idea has gained new support.
  • Recent research indicates that the cells can contribute to aging in the originally proposed way and also by spurring inflammation. Plus, they can harm nearby cells in ways that promote cancer.
  • Some evidence in mice suggests that retarding cellular senescence may help slow aging and delay some of the ills associated with it.

In 1999 Jan M. Van Deursen and his colleagues at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., wanted to see whether mangled chromosomes cause cancer. So they engineered mice deficient in a protein that helps to maintain chromosomal integrity. The rodents' coils of DNA were duly deranged. Surprisingly, though, the animals were not particularly tumor-prone. Instead they developed a strange grab bag of ills, including cataracts, dwindling muscles, rapid thinning of fat under the skin and progressive spinal curvature, that made them look like one-humped camels. They also tended to die young.

Van Deursen had no idea why those particular abnormalities showed up. Then, in 2002, he spotted a report on mice afflicted by accelerated aging and was struck by photographs showing that their backs became humped as they aged. Suddenly, it hit him: his camel-backed mice, too, were aging unusually fast. Probing deeper, the Mayo team discovered that cells in a number of the rodents' tissues had prematurely slid into a state called cellular senescence, in which cells permanently lose the ability to divide and become aberrant in other ways. Such failure of cell division would explain the bone, muscle, eye and skin abnormalities observed by van Deursen's group.


This article was originally published with the title Quiet Little Traitors.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. EyesWideOpen 03:12 PM 8/14/12

    I've often wondered if aging is a form of cancer that can be cured or sent into remission like any other form of cancer.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. JacobSilver 04:50 PM 8/15/12

    Eating a proper diet, which means one which contains all of the amino acids necessary for human protein generation, the essential omega oils, all of the minerals, all of the A and B vitamins, and Vitamin E, and one is exposed to sun light, sufficient to generate Vitamin D, and, finally if one is active, one can avoid most 'diseases,' including cancer, and have a good and healthy outlook on life. Of course you will need good genes to take advantage of this lifestyle. And, as healthy as you may be, you still have a meeting with the grim reaper. It seems that our cells cannot divide forever, and when cells begin to fail so also does our plumbing, our electrical system, and even our skeleton. Senescence is a nice word for failure due to aging.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. wywong 03:26 AM 8/20/12

    Although the article seems to paint the picture that cellular senescence has more cons than pros, the law of evolution dictates that the two should be in balance. If, for example, senescent cells are doing more harm than good, then evolution should have eliminated them long ago. Conversely, if they are doing more good than harm, then cells should turn senescent earlier than they do now. It is thus no surprise that killing senescent cells in rodents do not prolong their lives.

    Of course humans may be exception to the above argument because our lifestyles have been changing faster than evolution can catch up, but if that is the case, it doesn't make sense to draw any conclusions from rodent experiments.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Email this Article

How Senescent Cells Spur Aging and Cancer: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X