Subscription Center
Our planet's littered orbital environs urgently need a concerted cleanup effort
| February 1, 2012 | 12
See what we're tweeting about
sciencegoddess NIce thing about having to pull out the summer clothes? Bonus (washed) dollar bills in the back pocket of the shorts I'm wearing today!
Horganism WSJ on new psychiatric "Bible," DSM-5, plus me: http://t.co/X8n2HR3kmO http://t.co/umWhBxkLgZ
EricROlson Stop-Motion Video Takes You on a Stunning 360-Degree Tour of South America
http://t.co/95iIQ5h8CN
Deadline: Jul 25 2013
Reward: Varies
This challenge provides an opportunity for Solvers to build a web-based or mobile “app” to explore data relationships in scholarly conte
Deadline: Jul 15 2013
Reward: $5,000 USD
SciBX: Science-Business eXchange, a joint publication from the makers
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
12 Comments
Add CommentI couldn't get the graph of conjunctions. would any one explain it to me please?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI know! Debris credit swaps! Smells like Total Win to me!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisA major problem concerning space junk educational efforts is the lack of poster Tribbles and trilling, cute-as-a-button robots useful for generating sympathy and outrage.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thistimbo555, I believe you meant "credit debris swaps".
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisHowever, your attempt at cleverness falls flat, since the subject of this article has absolutely nothing to do with the existence of the OWS camp in which you reside.
We need to make a new mandate in the world court that states if you have to have a recovery plane before you can send anything in orbit. That may help in the long run of things, we have to start somewhere.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thiseasy solution: space sharks...equipped with lasers
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAll we need to do is launch a big broom and dust pan! Problem solved.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWe will approach this problem as we have approached all other such ones.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisOur golden rule is "Carry on until too late"
We will carry on wringing our hands, making half-hearted attempts to alleviate the problem.
We will solicit scientific and technical recommendations and then water them down (saving money)
to the point of being ineffective.
Then the cry will be "Near-Earth space is un-usable. I said this would happen"
That's how we deal with limited resources, be it the Newfoundland cod banks, the near-Earth environment or any one of many more.
As well as dodging debris, why can't the ISS and maybe other satellites have a Kevlar net to catch at least the bigger stuff for recycling, or redirect it into a degrading orbit, maybe with robotic solar sails or rockets to guide it?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisConcerning the 3D film, why do we need advanced technology for 3D? We could have a lesser version with split screens on computers and TVs, or whole screens on pairs of either, to be viewed either cross-eyed or with a viewer using mirrors. Hasn't anyone tried this sort of thing?
I dont think that final trend line on the last page is right, the end appears to be a "hockey stick". I think an exponential curve would have been better.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIf you haven't watched "Planetes," do.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisPLEASE listen to my words. Do not scrap the debris instead collect them in space. Their are companies going to go up there soon for mining and exploration. What needs to happen with the debris is it needs to be used to make the space stations and colonies in space. There solar panels can be reused. The alum can be constructed by sending engineers to construct and add to the space station and creating a colony. This makes sense because you don't have to haul everything to space because it is already there. No more wasting money 300 billion dollars worth of debris of the highest tech that can be used and rebuilt. Please someone with a brain take my solution and use it. There is no reason why we should not already have colonies in space.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this