Lights Out?: How the Grid Copes When a Nuclear Power Plant Goes Down

What companies are doing to keep consumers out of the dark when a power facility fails















Share on Tumblr

vermont-yankee-nuclear-power-plant

VERMONT YANKEE: The long, low wooden cooling towers of the 35-year-old Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant have suffered several problems in recent years—but without causing problems for Vermont's grid. Image: COURTESY OF ENTERGY VERMONT YANKEE

Last Friday at 11 A.M., the operators of the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant in Vernon, Vt., detected a leak. About 60 gallons (225 liters) of water a minute was escaping from the eastern cooling tower of the 620-megawatt power plant that provides nearly three quarters of the state's electricity needs. By noon, the owners had shut down both the damaged and undamaged cooling towers and had cut the plant's electricity output in half to avoid any harm to the reactor. By Monday, the plant was operating at 23 percent capacity because of limits on the amount of water it could use from the Connecticut River to cool its nuclear core.

But Vermont electric consumers barely noticed—though they might feel it later in their wallets. Despite the shutdown of the state's major power plant, lights, TVs and life's other electrical amenities continued to operate as usual. How is that possible? The company that operates the state's power grid has a contingency plan in case of emergency shutdowns, says Dorothy Schnure, a spokesperson for Green Mountain Power, one of two local utilities that purchase and resell much of the power from Vermont Yankee.

ISO New England, Inc., the independent system operator that ensures juice is flowing in Vermont and the rest of New England, always has spare power sources—courtesy of fossil fuel–fired, so-called "peakers" (units that provide power to the grid only during peak demand)—to compensate if power plants or transmission lines go on the fritz, according Erin O'Brien, an ISO spokeswoman.

Rob Williams, a spokesperson for Entergy Vermont Yankee, the power company that runs the 35-year-old nuclear facility, says it should be back at full capacity by the end of the week, pending a safety inspection by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The leak was caused by a sagging bracket supporting a cooling pipe in the eastern tower. The problem is worrisome because the bracket—a piece of metal that bolts a support beam in place—was relatively new: All of the brackets in the two towers, which are made of wood, had been replaced after a similar cooling pipe collapse in the western tower last August. The brackets are now being replaced with a new, stronger design, Williams says.

Neither of these problems affected the safety of the nuclear power plant, according to Williams, noting that the towers are primarily used to cool the water before it is put back in the Connecticut River so that it does not scald too many fish.

But they may cause a fiscal twinge. The nuclear power plant provides electricity at slightly more than 4 cents per kilowatt-hour; the power that the utilities must purchase from other power plants to make up for the shortfall costs 8 cents or more. "If Vermont Yankee goes down, it's about $100,000 a day for us," Schnure notes. "But this time it is partially down so it's less than that."

Any increase, however, isn't likely to show up until at least January, Schnure says, because utilities could not raise rates without the permission of the Vermont Public Service Commission.

Costello says the utilities have yet to decide whether to seek a rate increase. "It's too soon to tell," Costello says. "The plant, we hope, will be back online in the not too distant future, and it will not be too large of a significant cost." Meaning Vermont residents may have a reminder of this summertime outage when they pay their electricity bills in the dead of winter.



1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. SpaceElevator 10:51 PM 7/16/08

    I work in a Nuclear Plant, and people ask me how the "grid" all the time. My answer is to imagine a bicycle built for 1000. Some of the cyclists are tiny and some are very large. (base load unit) They are all pedalling at the same cadence, 60 cycles per second. Sometimes they are pedalling as hard as they can and sometimes they are coasting. The base load units are normally going 100%, and the little plants are kept at intermediate power levels. They call this "spinning reserve". When a big boy trips off, the little ones pick up the load and the whole thing keeps going at 60 Hz. This works up to a point, because when 20 big units trip at once, like the big blackout 3 or 4 years ago, the whole thing collapses. And a base load unit takes a day or two to get back up, as long as they have some incoming power to get all the systems up. That's why the blackout lasted 3 days. You just don't hit the "on" button in a big Nuke or Coal station. Their systems have to be methodically tested, warmed, and sequenced, before they can even be "synched" to grid. It is a lot of work.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Lights Out?: How the Grid Copes When a Nuclear Power Plant Goes Down

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X