Last Dance with the Shuttle: What's in Store for the Final Hubble Servicing Mission

A Q&A with Hubble Space Telescope senior project scientist David Leckrone















Share on Tumblr



STAR OF THE SKY: The Hubble Space Telescope as it appeared at the completion of the last servicing mission in 2002. Image: NASA

Last month marked the 19th anniversary of the launch of the Hubble Space Telescope, an orbiting observatory that has become a household name and a linchpin of astronomical science. The telescope has proved remarkably resilient, enduring numerous glitches over the years—from a flawed primary mirror at deployment to a serious electronic failure this past September. Each time, Hubble has held on until astronauts arrived to perform repairs, an operation that is about to take place for the final time by a shuttle crew.

On Monday space shuttle Atlantis is slated to lift off on the fifth and final servicing mission to Hubble (confusingly dubbed Servicing Mission 4—the nominal third mission was split into two parts, Missions 3A and 3B). Four mission specialists alternating in two-astronaut teams will attempt a total of five spacewalks from Atlantis to replace broken components, add new science instruments, and swap out the telescope's six 125-pound (57-kilogram) batteries, original parts that have powered Hubble's night-side operations for nearly two decades.

To find out what a refurbished Hubble will be capable of and how long the telescope will operate without further service, we spoke to astrophysicist David Leckrone, senior project scientist for the Hubble Space Telescope at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.

[An edited transcript of the conversation follows.]


From the Hubble team's perspective, what are the goals for this shuttle mission?
This is our final opportunity to service and upgrade Hubble. So we're replacing some items that are getting long in the tooth to give Hubble longevity, and then we'll try to take advantage of that five- to 10-year extra lifetime with the most powerful instrumental tools we've ever had on board.

We have to do maintenance on the spacecraft itself, like replacing the batteries. There are six batteries that were launched in 1990 and have never been replaced—I bet you couldn't do that with your flashlight. And we have gyroscopes that help keep Hubble pointing stably so it doesn't jitter and smear out our very high-resolution imagery. These things have known average lifetimes and wear-out mechanisms, so it's time to replace all six gyroscopes. We have to replace another sensor called a fine guidance sensor that is used both to help control the pointing of the telescope in the sky and also for the science of astrometry, which is very precisely measuring the positions of stars.

It's been seven years since we've serviced Hubble, and the normal servicing interval is three and a half years or so. It's as if you're supposed to service your car at 5,000 miles, but it's been 10,000 miles and things are starting to break down—particularly within our suite of scientific instruments.

In 2002, after the last time we serviced Hubble, we had 11 different channels operating among the six scientific instruments. A channel is like an individual camera within a box; for example, we put a new instrument on board in 2002, the Advanced Camera for Surveys, that has three separate cameras in it, each with unique capabilities, and each of these cameras we call a channel. So we had 11 channels active after the last servicing mission; we're now down to three. And among those three channels, only one was really heavily used prior to recent times. So there has been significant deterioration in the tools that we use for observing the sky.

After this mission is over, if everything goes perfectly—and this is an extraordinarily complex and ambitious mission, so nobody should be surprised if we don't get absolutely everything done—we should be up to 14 channels with the very highest technology that we've ever flown on Hubble. It will be more powerful as a scientific tool than it's ever been before.



7 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. gigabetz 12:46 PM 5/11/09

    I would like to take this opportunity to congradulate all the people responsible for the Hubble telescope. What a marvelous piece of engineering. When I was a child I dreamt of being an astronaught, seeing Hubbles pictures reminds me why I I felt so strongly about that. You inspire a great many people with your science.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. gclark7 07:28 PM 5/13/09

    I don't comment much, but boy oh boy, if we used the money we waste on wars and religion, on science......just think how much better off we would be.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. tomschumm 07:55 PM 5/13/09

    When the government actually "gets it right", it is certainly wonderful, and observing the incredible Hubble legacy unfold has been one of the great joys of my adult life. Congratulations to all involved!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. tomschumm 08:01 PM 5/13/09

    The Hubble project was one that not only was destined for greatness in the annals of history, but exceeded everyone's expectations. Being a witness to the unfolding legacy of Hubble has been one of the greatest thrills of my adult years.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Daniel35 01:26 PM 5/14/09

    I'm definitely a fan of science, but I tend to think there are some parts of science, that have universal value and some that should be considered intellectual recreation, paid for by donations, not by taxes, especially cosmology. I'd be happy to contribute a share on some projects, but the further we get into cosmology, the more it seems to be based on long chains of questionable assumptions. There is no absolute proof of anything. The most important uses of astronomy and space sciences are things like watching for asteroids that might be on a collision course with Earth, and studying the sun, and the earth, to predict future conditions.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. tyson 10:40 AM 6/24/09

    According to me, the Hubble Telescope is by far the greatest achievement in the history of science. Whenever I looked up at the nightsky , I always ask one question to myself, what lies beyond. HST has reveal a lot of mysteries and hopefully many more in the last stages of its journey. I now know that beyond the emptiness of the night sky there lies many galaxies, stars, planets and many more. Congragulation to the people behind the Hubble Telescope.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. astroboffin 07:07 AM 8/2/10

    Four years ago NASA rejected a UK Proposal to build the Hubble Interferometer that would have created the equivilent 600 foot mirror in orbit. There was no response
    to the substantial proposal, or the proposed Twin Telescope Laser control / Synchronous pointing system. There was no response to the submission or follow up from the then NASA Administrator and others. Kevin Wilson

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Last Dance with the Shuttle: What's in Store for the Final Hubble Servicing Mission

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X