Hydrogen Production Comes Naturally to Ocean Microbe

Cyanobacterium gives off hydrogen as by-product of day-to-day processes.


Nature













Share on Tumblr

Hydrogen Production Comes Naturally to Ocean Microbe

Hydrogen Production Comes Naturally to Ocean Microbe Image:

By Katharine Sanderson

A seemingly unremarkable ocean microbe turns out to be a multitasker -- it can not only photosynthesize, but can also produce large amounts of hydrogen, opening up a potential way to make the gas cheaply for fuel.

The single-celled cyanobacteriumCyanothece 51142 can make hydrogen in air, Himadri Pakrasi of Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, and his colleagues report in Nature Communications1. Until now, the only organisms known to make hydrogen could only produce it in an oxygen-free environment -- making it a potentially expensive process to scale-up.

Cyanothece 51142 was discovered in 1993, off the coast of Texas, by Louis Sherman of Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, a co-author on the study. Pakrasi later discovered that the bacterium has a two-stage daily cycle. During the day it undergoes photosynthesis, using sunlight and carbon dioxide to make oxygen and branching chains of glucose molecules called glycogen. When the Sun goes down, the microbe's nitrogenase enzyme kicks into action, using the energy stored in the glycogen to fix nitrogen from the air into ammonia. Hydrogen is formed as a by-product.

The two mechanisms are different in that photosynthesis is an aerobic process -- one that requires oxygen -- whereas nitrogen fixation, and, consequently, hydrogen production, can take place only anaerobically, because contact with oxygen destroys the nitrogenase enzyme. But Cyanothece 51142 manages to fix nitrogen even in the presence of atmospheric oxygen by burning cellular oxygen to produce energy. Because no photosynthesis is taking place, the bacterium uses up its cellular oxygen so that the nitrogenase enzyme is effectively in a largely oxygen-free environment.

Rhythmic reactions

Cyanothece 51142 has a natural circadian rhythm that allows it to be 'trained' to produce even more hydrogen.

After a single 12-hour-day and 12-hour-night cycle, Pakrasi and his team kept the lights on for a further 48 hours straight. During this time, the microbes continued with their 'night-time' nitrogen fixation and hydrogen production in the period that would normally have been dark, but made more fuel for the process by photosynthesizing. The researchers found that under these conditions the microbes adjusted their photosynthetic capacity to maximize nitrogen fixation.

The amount of hydrogen produced in this way -- 150 micro moles per milligram of chlorophyll per hour -- is the most ever recorded in natural cyanobacteria under normal atmosperic conditions, says Pakrasi. If the bacteria behaved in the same way in a litre of culture medium as they did in the 25 millilitres of medium used in the experiment, they would make just over 900 ml of hydrogen in 48 hours -- the time taken for the experiment.

Natural high

"This is the most effective system published so far for hydrogen production," says Oliver Lenz at Humboldt University in Berlin, who works on the enzyme hydrogenase. In his work, Lenz has grafted hydrogenase directly onto photosystem I, a protein unit needed for photosynthesis. Naturally occurring bacteria can't compete with such systems, with hydrogen production rates in Lenz's system achieving greater volumes -- 3,000 micro mols of hydrogen per milligram of chlorophyll per hour, Lenz says -- but the system remains untested in a natural setting, and that's the advantage of Pakrasi's discovery. "I never expected such high rates for a natural organism," Lenz adds. Synthetic approaches such as Lenz's suffer from being short lived, Pakrasi says, often running out of steam within hours, whereas the cyanobacteria "just keep going for days".

Organisms other than cyanobacteria, such as the alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, also produce hydrogen at similar rates, says Olaf Kruse of Bielefeld University in Germany, who works with the species. But these other microbes need strict anaerobic conditions to work. Kruse is keen to see Pakrasi scale up his experiments to check thatCyanothece 51142 works as well when cultured in larger volumes. Pakrasi says that his team is about to begin this work, and has already moved from 25 ml of culture to 200 ml with similar results.

At the moment, Cyanothece 51142 has small amounts of a hydrogenase that eats up some of the hydrogen as it is produced. To make Cyanothece 51142 work better, Lenz suggests genetically modifying the bacterium to contain a more efficient hydrogenase enzyme, so less hydrogen is lost.

The work shows what an unmodified cyanobacterium is capable of, says Pakrasi. There are at least 10 other strains of Cyanothece, and Pakrasi expects these to work in a similar way. "One can -- and we have -- enhance the rate by making genetic modifications to the system," he says.


Nature

7 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Questaar 03:23 PM 12/15/10

    This is very exciting news indeed. If this was discovered in 1993, why are we only hearing about it now?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Postman1 in reply to Questaar 10:41 PM 12/16/10

    The article says that the bacteria was discovered in 1993. I guess it has taken until now to find out how it works. This could be really huge if it pans out.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. David Russell 11:55 AM 7/2/11

    Since they took my other comments away I will add that this is so sad that only two other people have responded to the most important science I have ever seen and it is over 10 years old. Come on big oil give it up you have made enough money since WWI.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. David Russell 12:00 PM 7/2/11

    I notice the Shell add is still on this page. Talk about obcenity.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. David Russell 05:58 PM 10/18/11

    To anyone out there please read this and think of the implications. All I see are multitudes of postings on things that will not save this earth and this awesome science sits and waits, and waits , and is still ignored. If you have seen this please share it with all the people you can. The carbon we still burn has so many other uses and science has caught up to it so nano tech, diamond manufacturing, carbon composites etc.. are happening and this could replace hydrocarbon burning in very short order.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. five9's 11:39 AM 12/24/11

    "The Formula" with George C. Scott
    kill one you reviled...kill a planet your revelled

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. David Russell in reply to five9's 08:35 PM 12/24/11

    We can do better. The 99%s are starting to get it. And it is quickly becoming 2012 isn't it. I think it is time for a change and it is not the end it is the beginning of something better.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Hydrogen Production Comes Naturally to Ocean Microbe

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X