NASA's MESSENGER orbiter has found evidence of pure water hiding near the planet's cool north pole
Small impacts should have buried the surface if the ice were a billion years old, and the MESSENGER researchers believe it might be much younger than that, perhaps 50 million years old.
"The ice deposits we are looking at are not ancient," says Paige.
This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on November 29, 2012.
See what we're tweeting about
Deadline: Jul 15 2013
Reward: $5,000 USD
SciBX: Science-Business eXchange, a joint publication from the makers
Deadline: Jun 30 2013
Reward: $1,000,000 USD
This is a Reduction-to-Practice Challenge that requires written documentation and&
Powered By: 
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
7 Comments
Add CommentAs a fact alone, this is very cool. Immediately it makes me think, however, about what this could mean for the future of space travel. I have long been intrigued by the possibility of finding a suitable asteroid or comet with low gravity/escape velocity and lots of water that could be used as a staging ground for spacefaring vehicles that could convert water to hydrogen for fuel. For that reason, I have been more enthusiastic than others about Obama's plans for American astronauts to visit an asteroid. For the same reason, although the gravity/escape velocity is higher on the Moon than on any asteroid, I have been keenly following the detection of water on our natural satellite.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisSo this news makes Mercury look like a good candidate as well. I looked up the gravity and escape velocity: .38g and 4.25km/s respectively. This is significantly more than the Moon's (0.165g and 2.38km/s), but better than Mars in escape velocity (.378g and 5.027km/s). Of course, the Moon is much closer to Earth than Mercury or Mars, so it is still the best candidate so far, but Mercury starts to look attractive nonetheless. Certainly generating solar power on Mercury wouldn't be a problem, either!
Small correction: The Moon is still the best candidate of the three: Moon, Mars, Mercury. However, an asteroid or comet with enough water and close enough to Earth is still, to my mind, the best option as a base/construction platform/staging area for serious interplanetary exploration and colonization.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThis is good news. If America ever sends a man to the Sun he could find water on the way. One more problem solved.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisFolks, in future it won't be men doing space travel. It would be robots guided by other robots ( I.e . Not bio- intelligence but non- bio- intelligence and non- bio- structures ) who would do interplanetary traveling. The requirement of water for drinking and oxygen for breathing or bio- degradation of our bio- structure ( heart, lungs, kidneys etc) are no more limitations . Much water has flowed under the bridge since star trek days. Human foibles and frailties no more affect space - exploration. It would be purely for business purposes by businessmen to mine for minerals and precious stones and other exotic stuff for the consumption of the very few bio- mass( bio- humans ) left on earth. Even down on planet earth events and markets would be controlled by non- bio- intelligence .Bio- reproductions will be a rarity enjoyed by the ultra rich only , who would have eliminated other bio-humans .
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisBy the second half of 21 st century humans, as we know it, would have been replaced by non- bio-beings. I am giving that to happen a little more time than Ray Kurzweil who has marked year 2045 as the upper limit for such take over ,in his 1999 book " The Singularity is Near ", updated in 2005 . But , he won't be too far off the mark. Humans, enjoy now as best as you can now;wonder as much as you can , now ; you have very little time left on planet earth where at least bio- intelligence, if not the entire bio- life itself , is getting replaced by Non- bio- intelligence.
Such explanation that Mercury has water ice, I think is not correct.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe explanation of sulfur given by David Lawrence seems better.
My explanation which may be more realistic:
At the start, Mercury stopped its axial spinning since long time ago. And now it circles around the sun with only one face facing it, while the other side is unseen by the sun (just like the moon in relation to the earth.)
Therefore, the side facing the sun has extreme heat, while the opposite side has extreme coldness.
Then at the start, the atmosphere became turbid and its gases mixed with each other to become like Venus now.
Then it lost its atmosphere to the outer space, so that its surface appears clearly not like Venus, the surface of which cannot be seen because of its thick smoke due to its mixed gases.
Then its water vaporized and disappeared into the outer space and it was lost.
So now Mercury has no air, no water and its surface appears clearly, and it has extremes of heat and coldness.
Sulfur is more likely, more than water ice: because specially when the gases of the atmosphere mixed with each other: one of the gases is SO2 which reacted with the initially present water vapor to precipitate H2SO4 and the sulfides.
http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/new_page_4.htm#How_the_Terrestrial_Planets_Will_Standstill_
I regret having posted anything here. I was hoping for rational discourse, but the SciAm forums are now apparently just for wingnuts. I didn't get the memo!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe idea that water came to our Earth from a comet is extremely imaginative and not realistic.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisTheir mistake comes from an erroneous presumption that the comet is a dirty ice.
The origin of water of Earth and the planets:
Water of Earth (and the planets) came from the earth (and the planet) itself, as is the atmosphere.
The explanation:
Earth was a fire object at the start, because it was part of an exploded sun. From every fire object, gases and smoke emerge; the smoke was a mixture of seven gases; among these gases was the O2 and H2, then by electric current the H2O resulted.
http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/index.htm#The_Gaseous_Heavens
http://www.quran-ayat.com/universe/index.htm#Question_10