Copyright 2012 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
A new genetic analysis reveals that Ötzi the Iceman is most closely related to modern-day Sardinian
Copyright 2012 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Deadline: Jul 25 2013
Reward: Varies
This challenge provides an opportunity for Solvers to build a web-based or mobile “app” to explore data relationships in scholarly conte
Deadline: Aug 31 2013
Reward: $100,000 USD
The Geoffrey Beene Foundation Alzheimer’s Initiative (GBFAI) is launching the 2013 Geoffrey Beene Global NeuroDiscovery Challenge whose
Powered By: 
8 Comments
Add CommentCould Ötzi's Axe be used as a plough?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this"While the traces of these ancient migrations are largely lost in most of Europe, Sardinian islanders remained more isolated and therefore retain larger genetic traces of those first Neolithic farmers, Sikora said."
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWere the "larger genetic traces" a product of their isolation or a later infusion of Middle eastern blood during the Muslim raids of the Middle Ages?
In evaluating the "theory that farmers, and not just the technology of farming, spread during prehistoric times from the Middle East all the way to Finland", it'd be very interesting to understand how many people would have had to move the entire distance over what period of time.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAs for the objections to Otzi being a "tourist":
"That would have required Ötzi's family to travel hundreds of miles, an unlikely prospect"
"Five thousand years ago, it's not really expected that our populations were so mobile..."
Couldn't Otzi's family taken weeks or even years to travel those hundreds of miles?
I'm interested in learning who killed Ötzi and why. Based on current information it would appear that Ötzi most likely committed an offense against another individual or individuals and was brought to quick justice. Perhaps Ötzi wasn't a farmer, tourist or someone who merely chose to relocate to an unknown location. Perhaps Ötzi was an ancient criminal. More than ancestry can be determined by genetics and I believe the answers to my questions are within our grasp.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWhy it’s Chris Kristofferson! Well, we already knew he was a well-preserved Neolithic caveman.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisNot likely. I've seen in other stories that Otzi's killer removed the shaft of arrow that killed him (presumably beacuse the fletchings, etc. would have been identifiable), but left a very rare and valuable copper axe that Otzi had been carrying. This suggests that Otzi was known and respected in the area. If Otzi was a criminal, his killer would have wanted to take proof to show everyone that he was dead; instead, s/he made a clear effort to make sure no one could connect him/her to the killing.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe authors continue to fail to appreciate the mobility of early humans. Several hundred miles would be quite easy in the scheme of things. What should cause us to take pause is not the distances but the reasons they may have had to undertake such a journey. The most basic motivation for the migration of early humans is that they were either pushed by others or the ones doing the pushing. If the Sardinian origin holds true it may be this island was overpopulated for the technology of the time. The resulting frictions pushed some to the mainland where contact with other groups could have fostered more conflict. This basic point also helps explain the violent nature of Otzi's demise.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisProbably the Sardinia islanders and Otzi, the Iceman had a common origin, coming from the middle east. He didn't appear to be your typical farmer, carrying bow and arrows, and a copper axe which probably would have been equivalent to a fortune at the time, although the bow shaft and most of the arrows were unfinished, so perhaps he was a fletcher or bow and arrow craftsman.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisProbably regions were populated over generations rather than a single move, perhaps hunters seeing inviting areas or regions which appeared to have a lot of game, and such regions usually would be good places to farm as well, with underlying fertility of the soil and favorable climate.
I don't have any problem with the Iceman being related to the Sardinia islanders.