Cover Image: April 2013 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

In the Field: A Biologist Who Counts Wild Yaks

A wildlife biologist ventures to the Tibetan plateau to count wild yaks















Share on Tumblr

wild yak, yak, Himalayas, Tibet

Image: GETTY IMAGES

PROFILE

NAME
Joel Berger

TITLE
Wildlife biologist, University of Montana and Wildlife Conservation Society

LOCATION
Missoula, Mont., and Bronx, N.Y.

There are around 14 million domestic yaks in the world, but nobody knows how many wild yaks there are. They're a vulnerable species. The Tibetan Himalayan region, their home, has tens of thousands of glaciers, and as the snow and the ice melt, we're not sure what it's going to do to yaks. Our expedition to the Tibetan plateau last November and December was to get a better handle on where we can find yaks and start to figure out how they're going to respond to changes. We picked that time of year because everything is frozen solid, and we can drive across lakes and marshes. Temperatures get pretty cold: it's an interesting challenge to get out of a sleeping bag when it's −20 degrees Fahrenheit.

We did a snapshot survey in the northeastern corner of the Tibetan plateau, where we counted about 990 yaks. Poachers have targeted wild yaks for their meat and hide up until the past half a century. Our Chinese collaborators have done a great job with antipoaching patrols, and it appears that the yak numbers are coming back, but we don't have good measures of the trends.

Wild yaks used to occur down to elevations around 10,000 feet, whereas now they are restricted to elevations around 14,500 feet—and up to 17,500 feet. It's likely the reason that they don't occur at such elevations now is contact with people [who have encroached on their territory] rather than temperature intolerance.

When I think about these places at the limits of life, I think about the future. Ultimately, what can we do to ensure the persistence of wild yaks? What kind of actions do we need to take that also account for human livelihoods in that area? I work with colleagues, government employees and herders because they care just as much as I do. If we don't address the concerns of people, we're never going to conserve the species.

COMMENT AT ScientificAmerican.com/apr2013



This article was originally published with the title Extremely High and Incredibly Cold.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.
Rights & Permissions

1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. dbtinc 08:50 AM 4/11/13

    14E6 and they're vulnerable?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

In the Field: A Biologist Who Counts Wild Yaks: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X