Image: Image courtesy of Cristian Baitg, via iStockphoto.com
-
The Best Science Writing Online 2012
Showcasing more than fifty of the most provocative, original, and significant online essays from 2011, The Best Science Writing Online 2012 will change the way...
Read More »
Readers are bombarded with many "best-of" lists this time of year touting the latest and greatest in technology. Scientific American decided to broaden this idea a bit further, in search of a sampling of technologies that members of our advisory board—a group of highly accomplished scientists, engineers, educators and entrepreneurs—could not possibly live without. "Technology" was defined loosely—it could have been a high-tech personal gadget such as an iPhone or something as basic as a nail clipper. The answers [below] were at times surprising but always interesting.
Scientific American also threw the same question out to our readers. To see their responses check out Scientific American's Facebook page.
What technology do you find indispensable?
"My iPhone, my three Macs and my bike. All three embody the perfect fusion of form and function. You only get this rarely. The Le Corbusier chair, the Boeing 747, the Golden Gate Bridge, the iPhone and the Mac—these are some of the few human artifacts that embody this key principle of evolutionary design. And all three are essential to urban living in a high-tech world—to stay connected, to stay mobile and to work anywhere and anytime. Having three Macs is basic to my lifestyle—one iMac with the big integrated screen at work, a second one at home and an Air/laptop for travels."
Christof Koch
Lois and Victor Troendle Professor of Cognitive and Behavioral Biology
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif.
Chief Scientific Officer
Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle
"AliveCor iPhone ECG/EKG…it's the hottest!!! It's absolutely transformative to cardiovascular health, has been approved in Europe and is heading for U.S. approval."
G. Steven Burrill*
Chief Executive Officer
Burrill & Company, San Francisco
"For me it's the pen, more than any other. There is no instrument more powerful than the writing instrument in my mind. Ability to communicate and 'archive' thought, enabled through writing."
Robert Palazzo
Provost and Professor of Biology
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, N.Y.
*Disclaimer: Burrill & Company was the lead investor in AliveCor's latest round of funding.
See what we're tweeting about
19 Comments
Add CommentWell, this article was a waste of time.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisMy feelings exactly. Compounded by the title of "the world's smartest people" I'm doubly disappointed.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisQuite so. In fact, I would challenge the description "world's smartest people." If by that they mean "world's most chic people," then that's the only area of 'smartness' where this group can compete. [I suspect they don't win there, either]
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI thought it was really telling. There are multitudes of high tech gadgets claiming to bring information closer and closer expanding the mind and its possibilities. But it seems this article implies that the formula is hard work, natural ability, and basic tools to capture the mind's vision.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisYep, barring the bike, Volvo, and indoor plumbing, information tech is the common element. But we're talking the World's Smartest People (by what metric BTW?); they don't just use their "gadgets" to retrieve content but to generate their own.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIf generating ideas is your passion then tech that gives you the ..."ability to communicate and 'archive' thought" is indeed indispensable.
Einstein kept a pad and pencil in his hat.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisGadgets don't make us smart.
I think "language" should be at the top of the list and "print" as the second on the list. Without those, there is no sharing of ideas, no learning, no way to pass on knowledge. We would still be grunting in caves or swinging through the trees. The pen mentioned about is about the closest any of them came to these basic technologies we (civilized man) could not live without.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThese are smart people? This article was a waste of time.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWith two votes for the iPhone and one for the pen, te following may interest all three respondents:
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thishttp://www.deeppocketseries.com/Better_Letters.php
Nice write up. One guy even tries pumping his own device, very disingenuous.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisRe the description of these as the gadgets of the world's smartest people, my friend Maxwell -- who is 86 -- suggests that there are TWO possibilities: 1) these people get smart 2) smart gets things.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisDang, my shoe phone is ringing again....
The smart move would be to change your advisory board members to people with IQ's above 80, please!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thistouche'
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisEssential technology? Easy. Toilet Paper.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisFollowed by the flush toilet.
Followed by the recall petition.
I can't believe how many responders felt these people were not intelligent just because they aren't addicted to their electronics. The ballpoint pen is a tool and the iPad I am writing this on is a tool. If we ever have a massive outage, the pen will still work.....
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI was also disappointed by this article. There are many things that are, or were at the time of their invention, fairly low tech that have nevertheless transformed the way we live. Among them are the light bulb, polyphase electric power that drives industry, transportation (auto & airplane) among many others that didn't even come close to appearing on the list.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisDon't blame the poor advisers, who I suspect are just as chagrined by the "world's smartest" label as many of us are. Boo to the lazy editor who came up with the lame label.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWhat is a VC, who appears to view SciAm solely as a vehicle for the promotion of whatever snake oil he happens to be pushing this week, doing on the Board of Advisers? Shouldn't those occupying these responsible positions be - I dunno - scientists?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisFunny how all the negative comments on the intellect of the people cited comes from the "Peanut Gallery". Don't see any professors listed there. Of course, no one seems to understand the meaning of the word "gadget". By definition a gadget is a novelty, something small and new, toilets and the transportation industry hardly fit that definition. And based on the title, what did the "Peanut Gallery" really expect to read? Some great dissertation on the "MEANING OF IT ALL" or a mildly entertaining read on the personal choices of some very smart people...this Peanut would like to know.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this