The Indispensable Gadgets of the World's Smartest People

We ask our board of advisers to choose the technologies that they could not live without















Share on Tumblr

"For something ubiquitous that we don't notice, yet 'indispensable' and with huge recent improvements, I'd nominate 'intentional genetics' [the altering of genetic information to produce a desired effect—ed.]. This invention dates back 9,000 years and affects essentially all of our food, pets, children and medical practice. It is beginning to impact our energy and materials.  It is quite likely that millions would die if we removed this invention (or even the past few years of improvements) from the earth—probably more impact than if we removed all iPhones."
George Church
Director, Center for Computational Genetics
Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Mass.

 

"I could not survive without a ballpoint pen in my back pocket. It's invaluable for scribbling notes on the front of my hand (my version of the PalmPilot...) to remind me to do things I used to be able to remember unaided before my age converged with my IQ while traveling in opposite directions."
John P. Moore
Professor of Microbiology and Immunology
Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York City

 

"Indoor plumbing! It's the most important gadget we've got—everything else is child's play."
Michael E. Webber
Associate Director, Center for International Energy & Environmental Policy
University of Texas at Austin

 

"The three higher-tech things that I most depend on are my couple-year-old MacBook Pro, my couple-year-old 32 gigabyte iPhone, and my several-year-old Bose wave radio. My wife's Volvo XC70 is also pretty nice."
M. Granger Morgan
Professor and Head of Engineering and Public Policy
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh

 



19 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. SuperString 05:47 PM 12/21/11

    Well, this article was a waste of time.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. GreenD in reply to SuperString 06:17 PM 12/21/11

    My feelings exactly. Compounded by the title of "the world's smartest people" I'm doubly disappointed.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. the Gaul in reply to GreenD 06:30 PM 12/21/11

    Quite so. In fact, I would challenge the description "world's smartest people." If by that they mean "world's most chic people," then that's the only area of 'smartness' where this group can compete. [I suspect they don't win there, either]

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Sdub2 07:29 PM 12/21/11

    I thought it was really telling. There are multitudes of high tech gadgets claiming to bring information closer and closer expanding the mind and its possibilities. But it seems this article implies that the formula is hard work, natural ability, and basic tools to capture the mind's vision.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Percival in reply to Sdub2 08:40 PM 12/21/11

    Yep, barring the bike, Volvo, and indoor plumbing, information tech is the common element. But we're talking the World's Smartest People (by what metric BTW?); they don't just use their "gadgets" to retrieve content but to generate their own.

    If generating ideas is your passion then tech that gives you the ..."ability to communicate and 'archive' thought" is indeed indispensable.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. Bops 09:33 PM 12/21/11

    Einstein kept a pad and pencil in his hat.
    Gadgets don't make us smart.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. BillR 08:25 AM 12/22/11

    I think "language" should be at the top of the list and "print" as the second on the list. Without those, there is no sharing of ideas, no learning, no way to pass on knowledge. We would still be grunting in caves or swinging through the trees. The pen mentioned about is about the closest any of them came to these basic technologies we (civilized man) could not live without.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. uconnron 03:01 PM 12/22/11

    These are smart people? This article was a waste of time.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. KateGladstone 03:25 PM 12/22/11

    With two votes for the iPhone and one for the pen, te following may interest all three respondents:
    http://www.deeppocketseries.com/Better_Letters.php

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. svande8952 10:41 PM 12/22/11

    Nice write up. One guy even tries pumping his own device, very disingenuous.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  11. 11. thevillagegeek 10:56 PM 12/22/11

    Re the description of these as the gadgets of the world's smartest people, my friend Maxwell -- who is 86 -- suggests that there are TWO possibilities: 1) these people get smart 2) smart gets things.

    Dang, my shoe phone is ringing again....

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  12. 12. MichaelH 04:32 PM 12/23/11

    The smart move would be to change your advisory board members to people with IQ's above 80, please!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  13. 13. eleaders in reply to SuperString 01:38 AM 12/24/11

    touche'

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  14. 14. Quinn the Eskimo 08:49 PM 12/24/11

    Essential technology? Easy. Toilet Paper.

    Followed by the flush toilet.

    Followed by the recall petition.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  15. 15. Maman13 03:01 PM 12/28/11

    I can't believe how many responders felt these people were not intelligent just because they aren't addicted to their electronics. The ballpoint pen is a tool and the iPad I am writing this on is a tool. If we ever have a massive outage, the pen will still work.....

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  16. 16. happykat 03:32 PM 12/28/11

    I was also disappointed by this article. There are many things that are, or were at the time of their invention, fairly low tech that have nevertheless transformed the way we live. Among them are the light bulb, polyphase electric power that drives industry, transportation (auto & airplane) among many others that didn't even come close to appearing on the list.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  17. 17. billfalls 04:40 PM 12/28/11

    Don't blame the poor advisers, who I suspect are just as chagrined by the "world's smartest" label as many of us are. Boo to the lazy editor who came up with the lame label.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  18. 18. Chris Miller 05:11 PM 12/28/11

    What is a VC, who appears to view SciAm solely as a vehicle for the promotion of whatever snake oil he happens to be pushing this week, doing on the Board of Advisers? Shouldn't those occupying these responsible positions be - I dunno - scientists?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  19. 19. oscar867 07:01 AM 1/5/12

    Funny how all the negative comments on the intellect of the people cited comes from the "Peanut Gallery". Don't see any professors listed there. Of course, no one seems to understand the meaning of the word "gadget". By definition a gadget is a novelty, something small and new, toilets and the transportation industry hardly fit that definition. And based on the title, what did the "Peanut Gallery" really expect to read? Some great dissertation on the "MEANING OF IT ALL" or a mildly entertaining read on the personal choices of some very smart people...this Peanut would like to know.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

The Indispensable Gadgets of the World's Smartest People

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X