Inside the Empowerhouse, a Gorgeous $250,000 Passive Home

The design debuted at the government's Solar Decathalon, but instead of just being a show piece, new versions of it are being installed around Washington by Habitat for Humanity


Fast Company













Share on Tumblr

Inside the Empowerhouse, a Gorgeous $250,000 Passive Home

Inside the Empowerhouse, a Gorgeous $250,000 Passive Home Image:

By Zak Stone

The design debuted at the government's Solar Decathalon, but instead of just being a show piece, new versions of it are being installed around Washington by Habitat for Humanity.

The Department of Energy's Solar Decathalon functions like an annual accelerator for new ideas in green building: teams from around the country compete to come up with innovative designs for sustainable housing, constructing models to display on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. Then, once prizes have been awarded, the teams go home and the designs are either forgotten about, sold off, or displayed on college campuses.

Not so with the Empowerhouse, the award-winning design by a team of students from The New School in New York City and the Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken, New Jersey. Instead, their design crossed the Anacostia River to become a two-unit home for families in the Deanwood neighborhood of D.C., installed by Habitat for Humanity and completed earlier this month. The effort was the first in the Decathalon's history when a team partnered with a nonprofit and government agencies as a part of the design process to bring a sustainable--and affordable--home to a D.C. community.

Editor's NoteRead our story about the Empowerhouse's first construction on the Mall here.

The Empowerhouse follows the principles of Passive House construction, an approach to building that emphasizes insulation, high performance windows, and air-tight construction. "This means the home simply does not leak heat or cooling in the way other houses do," says Orlando Velez, the project's director of operations. "So you can have a much smaller heating and cooling system, which runs basically on the same amount of energy that it takes to power a hair dryer."

It also means the house is cheaper to live in, consuming 90% less energy for heating and cooling compared to a typical house, and cheaper to build that other green homes. "You don't need 50 solar panels," states Velez. "Just use the materials really efficiently." Other savings come from using affordable materials, like insulation made from recycled newspaper, unfinished cedar siding.

And unlike other green-building initiatives who designs stick out from the traditional architecture of an urban neighborhood (like the Brad Pitt's Make it Right Houses in New Orleans), Empowerhouse's community-based approach--which involved design charettes to take input from the community and learn about local needs--should make the house fit in.

"Deanwood has a strong porch culture, which resulted in the strong emphasis on the front porches on the house," adds Velez. "There is also a strong emphasis on family and cooking, which led to a large, open kitchen that is a focal point to the living spaces in the home." The homes also include garden space to grow food. Laura Briggs, the faculty lead on the project, says that success was due, in part, to close cooperation with community members. "We listened to there desires and feedback and went through several iterations to meet their ambitions."

The units cost about $250,000 each to build. Habitat plans to build six more elsewhere in the city.


Fast Company Copyright 2012 by Fast Company. Reprinted with permission.


2 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. dwbd 08:01 PM 12/20/12

    Finally showing a REASONABLE and COST EFFECTIVE method of reducing emissions & fossil fuel consumption. Give up on putting the STUPID Solar Panels on homes and labeling it "Net-Zero Energy" because the people who come up with these NUTTY designations don't have the remotest idea as to how the power grid operates.

    I'm all for cost effective, efficient, SENSIBLE energy solutions. Just quit the Greenie hype NON-SOLUTIONS. Net Zero-Energy being one of the stupidest.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Carlyle 11:51 PM 12/28/12

    I do not know the details of the design but one thing strikes me as being unhealthy. Perhaps it has been addressed satisfactorily. If I lived in such a house I would be concerned about the lack of ventilation & fresh air. Perhaps a small heat pump or simple heat exchanger to recover heat from exhaust air to provide replacement heat to incoming fresh air. I would be like as seal at an ice blow hole living in such a place but then I am accustomed during leisure time, to sitting in an easy chair on my back deck enjoying an Aussie balmy Pacific Ocean sea breeze. At present time of writing, 84 F.
    Makes it easy to be smug. I am serious about my query though. I do travel to colder climes & like fresh air regardless of the weather outside.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Inside the Empowerhouse, a Gorgeous $250,000 Passive Home

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X