By now the world is aware that the oceans are dying a silent death because of coastal development, pollution, overfishing and climate change. Scientists know how to halt or reverse the chronic threats, but in the political arena they have faced defeat after defeat in trying to implement management that actually works. We need a radical shift away from the piecemeal regulation of small areas that has resulted. We need comprehensive zoning of the world’s oceans.
Across the globe, it is clear which marine areas are the most important to protect. Estuaries, coastal wetlands, reefs, submarine mountains and food-rich water flows are among the critical habitats that support wide swaths of the ocean’s ecology. But current governance does not allow us to use management tools and policy instruments in a systematic, holistic way. Zoning would.
Some countries have established a few isolated zones, mainly marine “protected areas.” But these are mere dots on the vast ocean. Comprehensive zoning would address whole ecosystems. It would also improve public understanding and reduce conflicts, by displaying in a clear, graphic way which human actions are appropriate where.
Zoning is simple, straightforward, systematic and strategic. It results in regional maps, in which every watery space is categorized for a particular use or array of uses—from commercial activities to recreational ones, including strictly protected areas that are virtually off-limits. The first step is to identify ecologically vital areas with a high concentration of important processes, such as the delivery of nutrients to plankton and algae that underlie the entire marine food chain. Then one must assess threats to those services and impose zones that prohibit harmful activity while permitting other uses at sustainable levels, such as recreational fishing, aquaculture or tourism.
One example is the multiuse plan that my colleagues and I developed for Asinara, a small island near Sardinia in the Mediterranean Sea. Another example is the recent declaration by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council to close off to commercial fishing all waters along the western and northern coasts of Alaska, stretching out for 200 nautical miles. Australia has established the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, a large, multiple-use protected area. Comprehensive ocean zoning would create a coherent, global system that clarifies the rights and responsibilities of governments and other stakeholders.
Zoning cannot simply be imposed from the top; that will only cause a huge backlash. A participatory process will generate acceptance; we already zone on land with little angst, by clearly defining who has authority over what, covering private and public lands in a contiguous mosaic. National governments would zone territorial seas and waters in their “exclusive economic zones,” but areas beyond would be zoned by countries cooperating under regional frameworks (which, by the way, would help rectify the lawless nature of these commons).
Real leadership is needed to initiate a worldwide process. Work could begin within the United Nations Environment Program’s Regional Seas Program or the U.N. Commission on Sustainable Development’s high seas group. National agencies, such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the U.S.—especially now with Jane Lubchenko at the helm—could also set up working groups. Unless organizations around the world bravely take the lead soon, we may have no way to correct the ineffective tack we find ourselves on today.
Note: This article was originally printed with the title, "It’s Time for Ocean Zoning."
See what we're tweeting about
4 Comments
Add CommentThis is an excellent article. Ocean zoning would address a worldwide set of serious concerns.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisPerhaps of similar interest, Congress last year was to have taken up a proposal to establish marine monitoring legislation that would have helped safeguard the waters off the US coast. It is my understanding that this legislation, supported by a number of credible scientists and regulatory agencies, never actually reached the House and Senate floors.
Worldwide zoning would be more comprehensive. But as a stop-gap, perhaps another try for US marine monitoring might be worth considering.
Who would do the necessary policing?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisGiven the U.S. government's fading ability to lead in world affairs, please Dr. Agardy, direct us in your next article to more world leaders in developing and implementing your sound ideas so we can collectively send them more money, press attention, research power, and perhaps even some chocolate chip cookies!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisLand Use zoning has been a great failure in developing viable mature communities, preserving land ecology and fostering conservation. Putting centralized governments in charge is the thing that is killing ocean life. Centralized control has created California's CARB and the U.S. EPA which are responsible for massive production of Carbon nanomaterials. Since 1975 in California and 1979 in the U.S. palladium catalytic converters have produced carbon nano pollutants and expelled them directly into the air from every new spark ignition car sold in the United States because of CARB and EPA mandated installation of palladium catalytic converters in these vehicles. These carbon nano pollutants are mostly removed from the air by the water scrubber effect of precipitation and carried to the oceans. These nano particles are too small to be removed by normal filtration processes. The mass to volume of most of these insoluble carbon nano pollutants is less than or equal to that of H2O, causing them to concentrate their physico-toxic effects at the surface and in the upper few hundred feet of the oceans.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this