Cover Image: July 2012 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Is This Robo Cat the Future of Battlefield Recon? [Preview]

Nimble robots like this Cheetah will help the military navigate terrain too rocky for wheels















Share on Tumblr



THE CHEETAH relies on a control computer to provide stability and on a flexible spine to regulate its gait.

Image: Andrew Hetherington

In the decade since the start of combat operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, the military has relied increasingly on robots. Drones and bomb-removal bots have been designed to keep troops out of harm's way. Now the U.S. Department of Defense is looking for sleeker, faster robots that can assist with a wider range of missions.

The Cheetah, pictured at the right, is one of the new breeds under development. Real cheetahs, which can sprint up to about 120 kilometers per hour, are the fastest-running animals; the robot, made by Boston Dynamics in Waltham, Mass., reaches nearly 30 kilometers per hour, making it the fastest-legged robot.


Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

Larry Greenemeier is an associate editor at Scientific American.


Rights & Permissions

4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. promytius 10:41 AM 7/9/12

    Looks like nothing more than an inexcusably expensive target. The efforts should go into raising the basic standard of living for everyone; that's how to make war. Dollars, not bullets, and while you're doing that, make sure it's only rich money that's used, not my tax dollars. I do not want to finance death in any deal. Add up how much we spent in Iraq, divide that by the number of people still alive - if you simply gave each person that much and said to them, improve your lives, and be try to live better - you'd agree that's a better investment than the deleted uranium shells, leukemia, cancer, desperation and hatred for us resulting from our current methods.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. bucketofsquid 04:46 PM 7/10/12

    Since the Iraq war was essentially a pissing match between the Bush and Hussein families, I have no issue with the post from Promytius. Afghanistan however, was simply a matter of national defense.

    If you try to kill us we have the right to try to kill you right back. If you protect our enemies that have tried to kill us while you are pretending to be our friends and taking billions in payment such as Pakistan did then you should expect saturation firebombing of your main population centers.

    Personally, I prefer assassination because it strikes directly at the source of the problem with minimal collateral damage, also known as mass murder of children. Unfortunately most people cater to the silly concept of mass combat because politicians prefer to have other people get killed for their mistakes instead of being adults and taking responsibility themselves.

    As for the robots, well how much are your eye worth to you? How about your legs? The bots are cheap when put in proper perspective. Now if we could just get rid of the TSA...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. jrvz 05:08 AM 7/11/12

    It is a great pity that this technology is being developed at great expense for military purposes. Are there any peaceful or humanitarian applications?

    Also - they are trying to save soldiers lives. How about trying to save civilians lives??

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. jrvz 05:13 AM 7/11/12

    They are imitating a cheetah, which mainly runs on relatively flat ground to negotiate "terrain too rocky for wheels.

    Maybe they should be imitating a klipspringer ("stone jumper" antelope)or mountain goat.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Is This Robo Cat the Future of Battlefield Recon?: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X