Russian Rocket Failure Shouldn't Force Space Station Evacuation, NASA Tells Lawmakers

The International Space Station likely won't have to be vacated next month


TechMediaNetwork













Share on Tumblr

"The station itself can be flown uncrewed from Mission Control," Gerstenmaier said.

Of course, NASA and its international partners would much prefer to keep the orbiting lab fully staffed. Crew members on board can fix maintenance or servicing issues that crop up, for example, which can't be done from the ground.

And with more crew members aboard the station, more scientific research can get done. On a fully de-staffed station, some experiments could go on as before, such as the recently installed $2 billion Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer, which is hunting dark matter, antimatter and cosmic rays.

But many other projects would have to be dropped, or at least postponed, without astronauts on board to conduct them. And NASA hopes it doesn't come to that, officials have said.

"If the ISS needed to be de-crewed, the largest impact would obviously be to crew-tended research," Gerstenmaier said.

© 2011 TechMediaNetwork.com. All rights reserved.

 

 

 

 

 


TechMediaNetwork

3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Quinn the Eskimo 03:52 PM 10/15/11

    NASA's problem, as of now, it that they have no where to go.

    LEO is a waste land.

    The Moon is a dream.

    Mars is science fiction.

    The box NASA is in is of its own making. Now they have to live in it.



    .

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Mark Heinemann 03:42 PM 10/19/11

    Space travel is man's future, but our leaders are only interested in tax cuts for the rich. If they win, America will become a third world nation.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. bucketofsquid 11:38 AM 10/28/11

    The original idea for the ISS was to gather knowledge needed to be able to plant a base on the moon and start the slow process of outward expansion. LEO is not a wasteland because of GPS and telecom. The moon has mineral resources and microgravity fabrication potential. Mars is not science fiction because we have planted equipment there.

    Mars would have to be extensively terraformed to be truely habitable but fully enclosed subterranean colonies may be possible in the short term depending on the presence of exploitable minerals and the ability of plants to grow in an artificial environment.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Russian Rocket Failure Shouldn't Force Space Station Evacuation, NASA Tells Lawmakers

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X