King Crabs Poised to Wipe Out Rare Antarctic Ecosystem of Invertebrates

The crabs' arrival due to warming seas could deal a crushing blow to archaic species of starfish, sea spiders and ribbon worms at the Antarctic continental shelf















Share on Tumblr

According to Domack's results, the incursion seems to have started following the end of the Little Ice Age — a period of relative cold that began in the Middle Ages — but it has intensified as anthropogenic warming and southern ozone depletion have taken hold. Average water temperatures west of the Antarctic Peninsula have risen by 1 °C in the past 50 years, and continue to rise by 0.01–0.02 °C per year. “The heat injection is going through the roof,” says Martinson. “It's going up exponentially.”

Invasive species
The first evidence that crabs were poised to invade along with the warm water came early in 2007. Sven Thatje, a marine ecologist at the University of Southampton, UK, launched an ROV to the outer slope of the Antarctic Peninsula to map glacial grooves on the sea floor. But its cameras also caught sight of 13 king crabs (Paralomis birsteini) between depths of 1,300 and 1,100 meters. Thatje had studied the cold tolerance of these crabs and concluded that they could probably survive farther north at 2,000–4,000 meters, where the water is a degree or two warmer — “but then we found them even on the continental slope” only 500 meters below the shelf itself, he says. “These crabs were thriving at 1 °C. They were basically at the physiological limit that I had anticipated.”

But it was Smith's discovery of Neolithodes yaldwyni king crabs in Palmer Deep, 120 kilometers in from the edge of the continental shelf, that demonstrated a true invasion. West of the Antarctic Peninsula, cold water sits on top of warmer water. To reach Palmer Deep from the outer ocean, crabs or larvae must have crossed what amounts to a cold, high mountain pass only 450 meters below sea level before settling into Palmer Deep, at depths of 800–1,400 meters.

In December 2010, Thatje, working with Aronson and McClintock, returned to Antarctica and towed a submersible up and down the continental slope near the mouth of Marguerite Trough. The ROV traced 100 kilometers of sea floor, capturing 150,000 photographs that revealed hundreds of P. birsteini crabs between 2,300 and 830 meters down. “If you extrapolate,” says McClintock, “we're talking about millions of crabs.”

The crab invasion could have started a decade or two ago. When Smith re-examined photographs taken at the bottom of Palmer Deep in 1998, he saw telltale claw marks in the mud — indicating that at least some crabs were already present, even if none had been caught on camera. Domack looked at 30 years of water-temperature data measured at Palmer Deep during earlier cruises, and found that the sea-floor valley had gradually warmed — becoming ever-more hospitable to the crabs. Smith is now comparing gene sequences from crabs sampled in Palmer Deep with ones collected from deeper, warmer waters farther north in the Southern Ocean. The data from these experiments should help him to zero in on the crabs' origins and the date of their arrival.

But even without knowing the exact history of the invasion, the implications seem clear. Animals living on the edge of their physiological limits often struggle to survive and reproduce, but 19 out of 27 crabs that Smith collected during a cruise in 2011 turned out to be females carrying larvae or eggs. “This population is reproducing like crazy,” he says. “It's probably here to stay and expand.” As the ceiling of cold water continues to lift over the next 10 or 20 years, crabs could spill out of Palmer Deep and Marguerite Trough — and colonize the broader continental shelf at depths of 400–600 meters, devastating the endemic sea life.

Stifling heat
The warm waters will also bring other perils for Antarctica's sea-floor gardens. Many of the species here are exquisitely sensitive to increases in temperature. The brittlestars and other invertebrates have extremely slow metabolisms — an adaptation to the cold water — and only meager ability to absorb and transport oxygen. “So what do those guys do if it warms up and their metabolic rate speeds up?” asks Lloyd Peck, a biologist at the British Antarctic Survey in Cambridge, who has monitored these creatures in aquarium warming experiments. Their oxygen demand revs beyond what their gills can supply — and they slowly suffocate.



11 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. SteveO 08:00 PM 12/12/12

    But...but I thought all global warming was based on flawed computer models by people who wanted to stay inside and make more computer models so I would have to shiver in the cold. Are you saying there are actual observations of change? /sarcasm

    In before the denialists...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Denham 08:13 PM 12/12/12

    Are these king crabs the same as caught in the northern waters for human food, If so then fishermen should be told that there is good fishing in the Antarctic and this might alleviate the menace some what,

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. fweyer 03:19 AM 12/13/12

    I participated in the 2010 Antarctic research cruise and made a short film about the King Crab discoveries. It can be seen at www.crabnet.tv or at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVNTfpDlPzE.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Dredd 07:19 AM 12/13/12

    “They're natural invaders, ... They're coming in with the warmer water.”

    The human species makes the water warmer and they are the invaders?

    http://blogdredd.blogspot.com/2012/12/new-climate-catastrophe-criminality.html

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Chris G 09:35 PM 12/13/12

    King crabs are just one of many species shifting habitats, or rather shifting locals, as the climate changes. For instance, there is the lovely armadillo.

    http://mdc4.mdc.mo.gov/Documents/16308.pdf

    I suspect the armadillo is having less impact that the king crabs are, but species shifts are not really a new thing. The effects of a changing climate are already under way.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. Quinn the Eskimo 12:38 AM 12/15/12

    Have Red Lobster lower the price on Crab Festival. Enlist the show Deadliest Catch. Problem solved.

    Or, tell the Chinese King Crab helps with iron-rod erections. Problem solved twice.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. Postman1 09:11 PM 12/15/12

    Did these crabs move into these same waters during the last interglacial, when it was much warmer than now?

    Quinn- LOL!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. Postman1 04:23 PM 12/16/12

    Comment by Carlyle on another article: "So although the West antarctic melted entirely 3 million years ago, the original authors claim the crabs MAY have been excluded for fourteen My, just for luck SIAM doubled it & then rounded up a further 2 My & when I challenged them they deleted my post. I hope you can begin to see that this is not aberant behaviour. It is typical. You can look up the Ice record for Antarctica yourself if you doubt me. There could even have been later melts & almost certainly numerous times that match the present."
    I did not see the original post, but why would SA delete this?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. vertland@aol.com in reply to Denham 09:05 PM 12/17/12

    There is an abundance of crab because we have killed most of their preditors, so there is no need for fishermen to go far to get crab.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. northernguy in reply to SteveO 08:50 PM 12/22/12


    1. SteveO
    08:00 PM 12/12/12 writes...


    ......But...but I thought all global warming was based on flawed computer models by people who wanted to stay inside and make more computer models so I would have to shiver in the cold. Are you saying there are actual observations of change? /sarcasm...

    Perhaps SteveO missed the comment in the article where Domack says the process started at the end of the Little Ice Age. (at the top of page 3 in the article)

    The computer models referred to by SteveO such as the hockey stick put forth by Mann and others show that there was no such thing. Despite a multitude of historical references documenting said climate, people like Gore, Hansen and David Suzuki regularly use many computer models to show that _all_ climate variation in the last ten thousand years or so is anthropogenic.

    The most amusing comment that I have read that justifies rejecting historical evidence in favor of computer models is the belief the Medieval Warming Period and subsequent Little Ice Age documentation was all part of a massive real estate scam run by the Vikings.(!!??!!)

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  11. 11. MsEBL 01:24 PM 1/11/13

    http://evilbloggerlady.blogspot.com/2013/01/are-king-crabs-really-poised-to-kill.html Good comment. I linked it.

    While I am skeptical of global warming alarmism, I do not want to see gentle sea pigs wiped out by giant crabs. I do not discount some global warming is taking place. It is, the planet is getting warmer (whether that is because of the natural cycles or is completely man made remains to be seen). But this has also happened in the past and I suspect these fluctuations in predator prey overlap in Antarctica have happened before too. But I would suggest we investigate further and see if that is the case (or not).

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

King Crabs Poised to Wipe Out Rare Antarctic Ecosystem of Invertebrates

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X