Large Fish Populations Imperiled















Share on Tumblr

yellow fin tuna

Image: OAR/NATIONAL UNDERSEA RESEARCH PROGRAM

For weekend fishermen, there are many tall tales about "the big one that got away." New findings published today by the journal Nature indicate that big fish are indeed hard to catch. But disturbingly, the results suggest that's because the world's large fish--tuna, marlin, swordfish, sharks, cod and halibut among them--have been so exploited by industrial fisheries that 90 percent of them have disappeared from the sea.

That industrial fishing has impacted individual species, such as Atlantic cod off the coast of Newfoundland, is undeniable. But Ransom A. Myers of Dalhousie University in Nova Scotia and Boris Worm of the University of Kiel in Germany examined the problem of overfishing globally. They conducted a 10-year-long study that assembled data sets representing all major fisheries in the world over the past 47 years. The analysis included biomass estimates of large predatory fish populations from four continental shelves and nine oceanic systems. The team determined that within the first 15 years of operation, commercial fisheries reduced fish populations by 80 percent on average. In the Gulf of Thailand, for example, 60 percent of large finfish, sharks and skate were lost within the first five years of commercial trawl fishing. "Since 1950," notes Myers, "with the onset of industrialized fisheries, we have rapidly reduced the resource base to less than 10 percent--not just in some areas, not just for some stocks, but for entire communities of these large fish species from the tropics to the poles."

What is more, the researchers categorize their findings as conservative estimates. For one thing, the catch rate for longline fishing has dropped by a factor of 10 over a span of 10 years despite significant technological improvements. In order to stem the tide of devastation, the authors suggest, an overall reduction in the percentage of fish killed each year, perhaps by as much as 60 percent, is necessary. Although simple in theory, putting such guidelines into practice will require global cooperation and a willingness to give up short-term gains in exchange for long-term prosperity. But to ignore the problem, Myers says, could be disastrous. "If present fishing levels persist," he remarks, "these great fish will go the way of the dinosaurs."



Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Large Fish Populations Imperiled

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X