Collateral Data: NASA's Planned Moon Crash Churned Up Water, Lots of Mercury and More

Findings from the LCROSS mission's controlled impact into the moon reveal a complex brew in lunar soil















Share on Tumblr

Map of the lunar south pole and Cabeus crater

COLD SPOT: A thermal map of the moon's south pole shows the LCROSS impact site. Purple regions are coldest, with temperatures ranging from roughly –250 to –215 degrees Celsius. Image: The journal Science & UCLA/JPL/GSFC/NASA

A spent rocket stage that NASA sent hurtling into the moon last year in hopes of kicking up water from a polar crater delivered on that mission, revealing that at least a moderate portion of its target was indeed made of ice. But the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) revealed much more than that—hinting at a rich mixture of chemical species in the crater, including carbon monoxide, mercury and possibly silver.

Far from a "mission to bomb the moon," LCROSS involved two complementary pieces of hardware—a spent Centaur rocket as an impactor that produced a towering debris plume, and a sophisticated shepherding spacecraft that trailed it to sniff out water in the plume before crashing into the moon as well four minutes later. Data collected by the sensor-laden spacecraft, as well as measurements from a lunar orbiter passing overhead, are the basis for a suite of research papers about the mission appearing in the October 22 issue of Science.

When the Centaur struck the lunar crater Cabeus, near the moon's south pole, on October 9, 2009, astronomers around the world tuned in to try to glimpse the impact flash, thanks in part to a public relations push from NASA that drew attention to the event and its viewing potential. But most telescopes trained on the moon saw little. "It was sort of considered a flop," says Randall Gladstone, a planetary scientist at the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio and lead author of one of the new studies. "People were expecting an awful lot from such a small impact velocity."

The Centaur crashed into the moon at about 2.5 kilometers per second, roughly one quarter the speed of the impactor that struck Comet Tempel 1 in 2005 as part of NASA's Deep Impact mission. But LCROSS, Gladstone says, "wasn't a flop scientifically—we found out all kinds of great stuff." Mission scientists announced preliminary results from the experiment in November 2009, including the spectral signature of water in the debris plume tossed up by the impact. But after months of analysis the picture has become clearer, and a few surprising characteristics of the target crater have emerged.

"What we have now is we actually have concentrations," says Peter Schultz, a planetary geologist at Brown University who co-authored two of the Science papers. "Before, we had to do some hand-waving to do our estimates." Measurements from the shepherding spacecraft detected the presence of water in the infrared spectra of the plume. The researchers estimate that the shepherding spacecraft saw as much as 155 kilograms of water in its field of view; a series of measurements imply concentrations of roughly 5.6 percent water in the lunar soil that was churned up.

Scientists have speculated that ice could persist for long periods of time without sublimating to vapor in places such as Cabeus, because the rim of the crater, coupled with the low angle of the sun, keeps part of the crater floor in perpetual darkness. With temperatures that can range well below –200 degrees Celsius, permanently shadowed regions on the moon are among the most frigid places in the solar system and form cold traps that preserve all manner of chemical species that arrive there.

Other instruments provided additional information about the contents of Cabeus, including an ultraviolet spectrometer on board the LCROSS shepherding spacecraft and a spectrometer on the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), a spacecraft that launched along with LCROSS in 2009 and that passed over the impact site about 90 seconds after the Centaur crashed into Cabeus.

Among the chemical species detected in the plume by the trailing spacecraft are carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide as well as sodium and silver, although not all detections were conclusive. "We have a lot of different things stored," Schultz says. "Things migrate to the poles and get trapped in this deep, deep freeze." Some of those materials, he adds, were most plausibly delivered by comets impacting the moon. Diffused into the tenuous lunar atmosphere or liberated by the occasional impact, heavy atoms such as silver could bounce around the moon until they reached a cold trap. "Whatever we find at the poles probably built up atom by atom, molecule by molecule, from impacts all over the globe," he says.

As the trailing LCROSS spacecraft approached the lunar surface, documenting the debris cloud en route to its own impact just a few minutes later, LRO had its own spectrometer trained on the airspace over Cabeus. The Centaur impact blasted up material high enough for LRO to see from orbit, dozens of kilometers above the surface.

The plume spectra registered by LRO point to a vapor cloud containing hundreds of kilograms of carbon monoxide, molecular hydrogen and calcium. Most surprisingly, Gladstone says, was a significant spectral signature of mercury, probably more than 100 kilograms of the stuff. "With the mercury, we tried to find something else that would fit [the spectra], but it just does a great job," Gladstone says.

Initially the team was in disbelief, he says, until one of the researchers recalled an obscure 1999 paper in Meteoritics & Planetary Science about the possibility that lunar cold traps might harbor significant amounts of mercury as well as ice. The paper, authored by Argonne National Laboratory researcher George W. Reed, was cheekily entitled "Don't Drink the Water". According to what LRO saw in the debris plume over Cabeus, Reed may have been correct. "He did this back-of-the-envelope calculation to make this wild prediction—and it's dead-on, as far as we can tell," Gladstone says.

Although the new papers provide some answers about the lunar poles, the impact, so to speak, of LCROSS is still being felt. "I'm still working in this stuff," Schultz says. "I think this has raised a lot of questions." Among them: How do the materials trapped in polar craters arrive on the moon? How do they migrate to high latitudes? And can their relative concentrations be measured, as was done for water ice?

For the time being, at least one longstanding issue has been resolved. "The legacy of Apollo is: The moon is bone dry," Schultz says. "The legacy of LCROSS is: Not everywhere."



9 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. JamesDavis 08:12 AM 10/23/10

    How did all that CO1 get there? Has someone been burning fossil fuel up there to keep warm? Did the Alantians use the moon as a jumping point to get off of Earth?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. promytius 11:07 AM 10/23/10

    "An spent rocket stage" - no, "A spent rocket stage." English is a harsh language to learn; a harsh language.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. promytius 11:10 AM 10/23/10

    So what is this, Reality Show science? Leave to the Americans to get data by blowing something up or smashing something into something else. Keep this up and someday the Moon will be as livable as East Baghdad.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. EastwoodDC 05:49 PM 10/23/10

    "Keep this up and someday the Moon will be as livable as East Baghdad."

    :-)

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. nounours 08:36 AM 10/24/10

    I am surprised by my first exposure to this forum. Can SciAm please insert a filter to separate the inane from the serious and to reject the commercial stuff? As to the subject at hand, a discovery of great importance and a plus for American scientists.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. aeebee50 11:17 PM 10/24/10

    I thought this was great. What not sooner with a report? Instead of a space station, the moon could be colonized and it already had an American flag planted.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. David N'Gog in reply to aeebee50 08:56 AM 10/25/10

    Instead of a space station, the moon could be colonized and it already had an American flag planted.
    ==================================================


    The future 51st state? We could call it Moontana?

    On a more serious note. Carbon monoxide and water are some pretty good starting building blocks for building a long-term base on the moon. Mercury is interesting from a curiosity sake, but would it provide any benefit to our habitation?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. ennui 02:31 AM 10/26/10

    The Russians, Indians or Chinese will be very pleased with this information.
    One of the three will be there and leave the US High and dry.
    A visit by Nasa Officials to China found that the Chinese are way, way behind the times. (They will not show Nasa how much farther they are.)
    Waste of money by useless people.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. aeebee50 in reply to David N'Gog 06:38 PM 10/26/10

    I knew about the Americans, but the Russians may have a flag implanted on the moon. Sounds like the Chinese may have something in the plan. It seems that there may be more minerals to draw the attention of others, especially silver. All the scientists would have to do is announce GOLD and diamonds found, then the rush would be on.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Collateral Data: NASA's Planned Moon Crash Churned Up Water, Lots of Mercury and More

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X