Cover Image: August 2009 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Readers Respond on "The Expanding Universe"

Letters to the editor on PTSD, motion sickness, and more...















Share on Tumblr

Regarding Sanet’s letter, the speed of light having a constant value is at the heart of relativity and has been built into modern quantum theories of the fundamental forces. Nevertheless, there are some researchers who have been looking into the possibility that the speed of light could change on cosmological time­scales. This would have other implications for cosmological problems and has been used by some to try to explain why the universe looks so smooth on very large scales. But it is very difficult to create a theory in which the speed of light can vary. For now, there is a lot of evidence in support of conventional relativity, and so that is the favored theory.

Balancing Fact?
Finding Balance,” by Brendan Borrell [News Scan], reports on evidence for the theory, posited by Thomas Stoffregen of the University of Minnesota, that motion sickness is caused by poor posture control. Borrell states that Stoffregen hopes to further test his theory by having subjects float in water, where “the human body becomes passively stable, and postural control is no longer an issue,” making motion sickness “impossible.” I am a frequent scuba diver and have been diving with many who get sick while floating on the surface in rough seas. Less common but still frequent are people who get seasick while underwater in mostly shallow depths of around 25 feet when there is “surge” (back-and-forth water movement).
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, Calif.

STOFFREGEN REPLIES: Motion sickness while floating on the water is not surprising, as people will try to hold their head above the water. When the head is held out of the water, it is not passively stable. More interesting is people having motion sickness while fully submerged in shallow water that is moving. Moving water could lead to unstable control of the body, especially if people are trying to maintain visual contact with something. In this case, water motion would tend to push the body around, destabilizing the attempted visual fixation.

My proposal for testing our theory is to place people (fully submerged) at neutral buoyancy in calm and stationary water and to show them visual motion stimuli representing things that are effective at making people sick on land. If people get sick underwater but exhibit instability before becoming sick, we would have a confirmation of the theory, together with the disappointing realization that water immersion cannot permit “hard” theory testing after all.

Note: This article was originally printed with the title, "Letters."



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

7 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. basudeba 07:57 PM 7/24/09

    The expanding universe is a myth at the present level of evolution. It is apparent due to the rotation and revolution of the Galactic system. The present observation could be explained by these phenomenon just like in the evenning we find the Sun-light deeming creating a haze and the Sun grow in size. Further, the idea that we are not in a privilleged position is a myth. The so-called expansion is not uniform in all directions for all observers. Yet, in the beginning, there was an expansion.

    basudeba

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. mike hunt 12:37 PM 7/27/09

    silly rabit trix are kids

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. mike hunt 12:38 PM 7/27/09

    silly rabit trix are for kids, leggo my eggo

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. fbjbvjfkjvdfkvnjfkdn 12:47 PM 7/27/09

    u fagget dicks are for chicks

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. haroldkraus 03:43 PM 7/27/09

    STOP THE GALILEO TYPE OPPOSITION TO GAGUT!!!





    GAGUT:





    G ij,j = 0


    GOD ORDAINED PROF. G. OYIBO AS THE GREATEST GENIUS THROUGH THE GOD ALMIGHTYS GRAND UNIFIED

    THEOREM (GAGUT) OF EVERYTHING , REVEALED (1990) BY GOD TO PROF. G. OYIBO THAT PROVED THE

    FOLLOWING RADICAL TRUTHS:


    � GOD EXISTS AS THE ONE UNBOUNDED SPACE OF INTELLIGENCE CALLED THE UNIVERSE THAT CANNOT

    EXPAND.


    � AFRICROGEN (AFRICA THE ORIGIN), THE RIGHT NAME FOR HYDROGEN (HIDE THE ORIGIN) IS THE ONLY

    ELEMENT (NOT 118 ELEMENTS AS BELIEVED CURRENTLY).


    � G ij,j = 0 IS THE ONLY ONE CORRECT EQUATION (NOT INFINITE NUMBER OF EQUATIONS AS BELIEVED

    CURRENTLY) IN MATH AND ALL KNOWLEDGE.


    JOIN HARVARD UNIVERSITY BY DEMANDING THAT ALL EDUCATION BE REVISED TO ALLOW THE STUDYING

    OF GAGUT JUST AS EDUCATION WAS REVISED TO ALLOW THE STUDYING OF SUN (NOT EARTH) AS THE

    CENTER OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM (RADICAL TRUTH) DISCOVERED BY COPERNICUS, AND PROPAGATED BY

    GALILEO AND OTHERS. CALL OFAPPIT INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOR T-SHIRTS, BOOKS, AND COURSES

    AT (631)-242-3069 WWW.GEOCITIES.COM/IGALA1.



    LEARN AND TEACH THE ONLY REAL TRUTH CALLED GOD ALMIGHTYS GRAND UNIFIED THEOREM (GAGUT),

    G ij,j = 0, THE ONLY ONE CORRECT EQUATION FOR EVERYTHING, PAST,

    PRESENT AND FUTURE (NOT UNCOUNTABLE NUMBER OF EQUATIONS AS BELIEVED CURRENTLY).


    � NEWTON HAS PROVED THAT GRAVITY IS CONSERVED THROUGH

    TRANSFORMATION GIVEN BY:

    G m1m2 - Fr2 = 0


    � EINSTEIN HAS PROVED THAT MASS IS CONSERVED THROUGH

    TRANSFORMATION GIVEN BY:

    MC2 - E =0


    � OYIBO HAS PROVED THAT GOD AND EVERYTHING (NOT JUST GRAVITY

    AND MASS) IS CONSERVED THROUGH TRANSFORMATION GIVEN BY:

    G ij,j = 0

    � GAGUT HENCE IS THE ONE AND ONLY CORRECT UNIVERSAL EQUATION

    AND LAW THAT SHOULD BE STUDIED BY EVERY ONE.


    � GAGUT CONSTITUTES A RADICAL REVOLUTION OF EDUCATION AND

    KNOWLEDGE.

    � OPPOSITIONS AGAINST GAGUTS RADICAL REVOLUTION ARE CURRENTLY VERY STRONG AND SIMILAR TO

    THE OPPOSITIONS AGAINST DISCOVERY OF SUN (NOT EARTH) AS THE CENTER OF OUR SOLAR SYSTEM

    (RADICAL TRUTH) BY COPERNICUS AND PROPAGATED BY GALILEO.


    �JOIN HARVARD UNIVERSITY BY DEMANDING THAT ALL SCHOOLS LEARN GAGUT G ij,j = 0, THE ONLY

    CORRECT EQUATION AND KNOWLEDGE REVEALED BY GOD THROUGH PROF. G. OYIBO. CALL OFAPPIT

    INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOR T-SHIRTS, BOOKS, AND COURSES AT (631)-242-3069

    WWW.GEOCITIES.COM/IGALA1.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. dogrobber4 05:10 PM 8/10/09

    Concerning your article in last months issue on our universe expanding faster than it's suppose to. Could it be simply that as the galaxies become further apart from one another, their attraction to each other is halfed. As in a magnetic field? You double the distance and have one-quarter the pull. And what about the idea of momentum creating waves across space/time pushing things apart? I mean atoms spin, planets spin, solar systems spin, galaxies spin. So why can't the known universe be spinning? Or perhaps all the spinning of the atoms on up to galaxies is like a gigantic cosmic engine sending out "mometum waves" to warp space/time. I have a hard time wrapping my mind around "dark matter", do we have to go back to the "ether of space" idea?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. Pedrowen 12:55 PM 11/10/09

    Still thinking about the haroldkraus comment!?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Readers Respond on "The Expanding Universe": Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X