Cover Image: June 2010 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Readers Respond on "Fixing the Global Nitrogen Problem"

Letters to the editor from the February 2010 issue of Scientific American















Share on Tumblr

Robert Olshansky
Wayland, Mass.

YOUNG REPLIES: Cold dark matter (CDM) has become an important component in current cosmological theories. Evidence for cold dark matter comes from observations of the rotation curves of galaxies and of the structures seen at galaxy and larger scales (bigger than 100,000 light-years, say). The lumpiness seen at smaller scales does not seem to require CDM, though. For star formation as discussed in the article, we are looking at size scales of only one light-year or smaller. On these scales, ordinary matter seems to be all that is needed to explain the dynamics and energy balance of the structures we see. Also, because CDM does not interact strongly with electromagnetic radiation, it cannot radiate its energy efficiently. It is this radiation and cooling that tips the balance in favor of gravity to form stars.

Dancing until Dawn
Every lobbyist in Washington would dance until dawn if the proposal advanced by Jeffrey D. Sachs in “Fixing the Broken Policy Process” [Sustainable Developments] to forbid campaign contributions by registered lobbyists came to pass. Because these contributions come out of the lobbyists’ own pockets, they would instantly receive, in effect, a raise. The step would make not a ripple in the corruption inherent in our current political campaign financing system. Contributions from lobbyists are a tiny share of the cash flowing in from moneyed interests and indeed from average Americans. Only mandatory campaign-spending limits offer any real hope of reducing the impact of money on Congress; a ban on television advertising would not hurt. Sadly, our Supreme Court is moving exactly in the opposite direction, clearing the way for unlimited third-party spending on elections.

The fundamental ingredient that is lacking is public consensus. And for that we have ourselves and our neighbors to blame. Farmers like corn ethanol, miners like coal, bankers like carbon trading, and so on. As my old boss once said, one man’s pork is another man’s vital national program. With such a diverse country, it is a wonder that anything gets done right.

My radical proposal: less money, certainly, but radically less; more lobbyists, not fewer, so that all our myriad points of view are better represented; more closed meetings so members could actually compromise in the public interest without fear of “gotcha” attacks from the interests hurt thereby.

Robert R. Rose
Woodbridge, Va.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. eco-steve 06:30 PM 5/24/10

    The Eprida foundation have developped a cheap method of combining charcoal with atmospheric Nitrogen to produce a high quality fertiliser cheaply, as part of a pyrolysis cycle.
    See www.eprida.com for details. Farmers used to allow nitrogen fixing plants such as clover in cornfields. Today, fields are so over-sprayed with herbicides that plants such as clover are eliminated from farmlands, thereby worsening the natural regeneration cycle....

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. jtdwyer 05:24 PM 6/18/10

    Re. Cold and Dark: Dark Matter is merely an unfounded proxy for unexplained gravitational effects.

    Attributing unknown observational effects to Dark Matter does a disservice to astrophysics, as unexplained conditions are quickly dismissed as additional support for the now well established Dark Matter.

    In fact, of course, no form of known matter meets the requirements specified for Dark Matter. Its hypothesis became well established based on the expectation that the dense distributed mass of spiral galaxies would rotate like the sparse, centralized mass of the Solar system. That expectation was simply unfounded.

    The boogey man did it. Don't look under the bed - you don't know what you might find there!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. robert schmidt 09:33 PM 6/20/10

    @jtdwyer, all you have to do is prove your hypothesis. Shouldn't be so hard to do as you seem to regularly post how your conclusion is the obvious one. If it is so obvious and clearly superior to the dark matter hypthesis, then it should be quite simple to prove. I eagerly await your up and coming article here in sciam.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. aquaponics.me.uk 07:58 PM 9/13/10

    Genetically splice leguminous nodules to the roots of wheat to create a new self N fixing food plant, or use aquaponics on a massive scale, thus saving humanity along with the environment. Easy.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. aquaponics.me.uk 08:03 PM 9/13/10

    The Big Bang wasnt so big after all, instead of 95% matter yet to be found, perhaps it mostly sucked.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Readers Respond on "Fixing the Global Nitrogen Problem": Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X