Cover Image: June 2008 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Mailbag: Yes, Earth's Crust Moves 25 Centimeters with Every High Tide

Land "Tides" -- Polar Ice Sheets -- Market Morality















Share on Tumblr

Smashing for Strings?
The box “Five Goals for the LHC” in “The Coming Revolutions in Particle Physics,” by Chris Quigg [Special Report: The Future of Physics], does not mention anything related to string theory as a goal of the upcoming Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN. Are any experiments planned for the LHC that could either support or falsify the theory’s claims, expectations or predictions?

Geoff Noakes
San Francisco

QUIGG REPLIES: String theory is not at the point of making specific predictions for the LHC, but the LHC might make observations that would encourage the string theory project. The discovery of supersymmetry would raise hopes that the incorporation of gravity that string theory has envisaged is a good path. Evidence for extra dimensions could likewise be seen as supporting some string theory ideas. On the other hand, observing certain kinds of new strong interactions might discourage the idea that strings will soon have relevance to our experiments.

Because string theorists are not yet able to compare a measured number with a predicted one, much of the impact will be in the form of a conversation between an experiment and threads in the string theory worldview. Even before it has begun operation, the LHC has influenced some prominent string theorists to put the theory aside, for the moment, to concentrate on theoretical problems that promise a more immediate dialogue with LHC experiments.

Note: This story was originally printed with the title, "Letters".



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

2 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Mark Harun 02:45 AM 5/25/08

    cool

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Hugh Jones 08:43 PM 6/11/08

    I completely agree with Delano Lopez on the "Free-Market Fairness" article. Woody Allen once quipped that "morality is subjective". Corporations & individuals have always justified in this fashion whatever they were doing, no matter how harmful. Thats why we have regulatory bodies to look out for the publics' welfare. Then it's doubly harmful when these entities are corrupted by politics and betray the public trust. In "Good-bye Ice?"; it seems to me rebounding land mass would compound the rising sea level issue, not negate it.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Mailbag: Yes, Earth's Crust Moves 25 Centimeters with Every High Tide: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X