Cover Image: April 2009 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Readers Respond on Procrastination--And More...

Letters to the editor about the December 2008/January 2009 issue of Scientific American MIND














Share on Tumblr

Go Ahead, Put it off
I disagree with Trisha Gura in “I’ll Do It Tomorrow.” I don’t see procrastination as a problem to be fixed. In my corporate job, I found that the longer I procrastinated, the more likely the “need” for that activity would evaporate. Now, in my software development and musical activities, I find that in the time between procrastinating and actually getting down to it, I very often come up with a more efficient or creative idea than the way I would originally have approached the task. Procrastination is a method for letting ideas cook longer.
“elpifco99”
adapted from a comment at www.SciAmMind.com

Weighing Hypocrisy
The Truth about Hypocrisy,” by Scott F. Aikin and Robert B. Talisse, was full of fascinating, quotable material, but it had some logical inconsistencies. The authors gave abundant reason not to engage in ad hominem attacks. That’s all well and good. They ultimately allowed that some hypocritical behavior indirectly supports the hypocrite’s position, such as in the case of a father who might say, “Don’t smoke, son; look how addicted I am.” That’s good, too. We shouldn’t renounce our ideals simply because we fall short of them. But couldn’t the same argument be applied to former New York governor Eliot Spitzer, who could have said, “Make prostitution illegal and strictly punished. Strong deterrents are necessary. Look at me, I need them!” This case is actually more consistent with the authors’ argument than the example they gave of Al Gore’s personal jet. It raises the question as to why moral (in a religious sense) hypocrites are apparently less redeemable than others.
Jennifer Schwirzer
via e-mail

How to Change
Although “Set in Our Ways,” by Nikolas Westerhoff, correctly depicts change as difficult to make, the article does not stress the most fundamental reason that people fail to make changes in their lives: competing commitments. For example, I’m committed to losing weight, but at an underlying level I may be more committed to appearing jolly and cuddly so that I’ll be loved. We all have thousands of these competing commitments, developed over a lifetime—and even when we recognize them, like slippery little worms they wriggle away from our awareness. Taking on these competing commitments one at a time, recognizing that they do not serve us and replacing them with commitments that help us move our lives forward present a daunting challenge—and are most worthwhile. In this way, it is possible to make large changes in our lives in a short period of time, regardless of our age.
“Chris210”
adapted from a comment at www.SciAmMind.com

Pro-Prostitution
I think the title of your article should be “Why Do Men Rent Sex?” rather than “Why Do Men Buy Sex?” Buying sex is called marriage; the marriage contract, distilled, has been as follows: the man gets sexual access and fidelity from the woman, and the woman, in ­exchange, gets lifelong financial support for herself and her offspring. Not consummating the marriage contract and “alienation of affection” (withholding sexual access) are still valid grounds for having a marriage annulled and for divorce.

A more interesting article might be entitled “Why Men, Crazy as This May Seem, Actually Get Married Rather Than Use Prostitutes”!


4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. gstanbrown 11:36 PM 3/27/09

    You have a letter favoring the earning method of sex workers. But the writer chooses to withhold his name. I agree with his position. Our difference is I am happy to give my name and town of residence. And I would enjoy getting in the face of anyone who opposes sex work.

    G. Stanley Brown
    Fairfax, Virginia

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. julmaki 11:15 AM 5/1/09

    Dear "Name Withheld": you seem to have forgotten the most ethical of possibilities for your sex life. Namely, not having sex if you can't get a woman to sleep with you without lying to her or paying her. Not all, but many many women go in to prostitution as a result of a serious deficiency in self-esteem and because they don't beleive they are worth more (often resulting from sexual abuse or neglect). Believing sex with one of these women is ethical just because you pay her is seriously misguided.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Comonsense 01:12 PM 6/23/09

    One is reminded of the ridiculous and yet ever-prevalent question "Are women human?" Mr. Name Withheld appears to think not.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Happiness in reply to julmaki 06:22 AM 7/1/09

    The deficiency in self-esteem that julmaki refers to is only prevalent in sex workers who charge low fees. We high-end professional girlfriends (who, btw, are indistinguishable from other girlfriends whose boyfriends buy them a lot of expensive things, take them to expensive places, and "help them out" on their bills) have nice, healthy self-images, thank you very much!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

Follow Us:

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American MIND

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Readers Respond on Procrastination--And More...: Scientific American Mind

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X