Cover Image: March 2010 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Readers Respond to "Rational and Irrational Thought"--And More...

Letters to the editor about the November/December 2009 issue of Scientific American MIND














Share on Tumblr

Smarts vs. Sense
Regarding “Rational and Irrational Thought: The Thinking That IQ Tests Miss,” by Keith E. Stanovich: I have been teaching at the college level for more than a dozen years, and I’ve often wondered why some of my best and brightest students utterly fail in certain tasks that less “intellectual” students are able to excel in.

Thank you for the introduction to “dysrationalia,” a phenomenon that seems to explain a lot. I look forward to more insightful articles like this one in your pages.
Ryan G. Van Cleave
Sarasota, Fla.

Dysrationalia! Finally, there is a diagnostic term to describe the all too prevalent affliction that we commonly refer to as “lack of common sense.”
Debra Grob
Belmar, N.J.

Most of the research on decision making and cognition in general has essentially shown that we are not rational decision makers. The best option, therefore, is to work on honing our gut instinct to increase the probability that the outcome of a choice will be rational.

Business psychologist Robin Ho­garth summarizes this counterintuitive idea in Educating Intuition (University of Chicago Press, 2001).
“hfpsycho”
adapted from a comment at www.ScientificAmerican.com/Mind-and-Brain

Mom Was Right
In regards to “Love the One You’re With,” by Nicholas A. Christakis and James H. Fowler, my mother could have saved you a lot of ink. Back in the 1960s when I was a teenager, she often told me, “Who you love depends on who’s around.”
“Dracaena”
adapted from a comment at www.ScientificAmerican.com/Mind-and-Brain

Childhood Anxiety
I found “Why We Worry,” by Victoria Stern, to be interesting and well written. The article hit home with me because I suffered from that kind of extreme anxiety when I was six years old and my grandmother died. No one would tell me she was dead—they just kept saying she “passed away.”

This led me to believe my mother would “pass” and be gone forever. I took to following her everywhere, including hiding under the couch when I was supposed to be in bed. I ended up on phenobarbital for several months, supposedly to help me get over my night terrors—at the age of six!

I am heartened to see that serious and productive research continues to be done for those who suffer from a disorder that can be crippling. Kudos!
“lillybeth”
adapted from a comment at www.ScientificAmerican.com/Mind-and-Brain

Baby Drama
Thank you for “Dangerous Liaisons,” by Ophelia Austin-Small. A childhood friend of mine recently became an unbearable drama queen. I now believe her behavior is actually a symptom of postpartum depression, but simply knowing the cause does not help me deal with her. This article’s tips were very enlightening. Thanks again!
“emeryannharris”
adapted from a comment at www.ScientificAmerican.com/Mind-and-Brain

Black and White
Concerning “The Color of Sin,” by Wray Herbert [We’re Only Human], I believe the association between morality and whiteness (and evil and blackness) is as clear as night and day. Night is a time when human beings’ main survival sense—vision—is weakened or nullified. Other animals with a better sense of smell or hearing have the advantage.


5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. martyweiss 11:26 PM 3/26/10

    Common sense is often a product of experience. I noticed the difference between "farm kids" and urbanites. Raised on a farm, exposure to mechanics and responsibility made them an order of magnitude safer with power tools than others. This quality appeared to bridge into a kind of maturity the urbanites lacked.
    Insulated from reality, urban kids often grow into adult responsibility slower than others and are slower to comprehend the consequences of their actions. The age of maturity of a farm kid begins when his legs reach the tractor pedals. Reality bites and, if we survive, teaches.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. e_caroline 02:02 PM 3/29/10

    I have subscribed to Scientific American since I was in the 7th grade... in 1967.

    Scientific American is a legitimate. peer-reviewed science magazine.

    I will jot subscribe to Scientific American Mind since it is a mouthpiece for the therapy industry whose efforts at "science" are laughable.

    The therapy industry is engaged in speculations on various philosophies of the mind and is so overloaded with sheer creationist-style pseudoscience that is is unworthy of my financial support.

    If I read it at all.. it will be in a library.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. mo98 08:50 PM 3/29/10

    Openness is at odds with security. Context sensitive rationality can be devoid its environment in tweetscape as well.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Steve777 03:58 AM 8/26/10

    This is a really good read for me. Must agree that you are one of the coolest blogger I ever saw. Thanks for posting this useful information. This was just what I was looking for. I'll come back to this blog for sure! I bookmarked this blog a while ago because of the useful content and I am never being disappointed. Keep up the good work. Besides, you can read a new article on this topic at http://www.pdfok.com/ <a href=http://www.pdfok.com/> PDF ok </a> I am sure most of the readers will find it useful.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Steve777 03:59 AM 8/26/10

    If you want to hear a reader’s feedback :) , I rate this post for 4/5.
    http://www.google.com search engine HTTP
    <a href=http://www.google.com> search engine </a> AHREF
    [url=http://www.google.com] search engine [/url] bbcode
    [LINK=http://google.com/]search engine[/LINK] LINK
    [link]http://www.google.com[/link] search engine link
    [a]http://www.google.com[a] search engine[/ a] a
    http://example.com or [http://example.com some link title].

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

Follow Us:

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American MIND

  • melanietbaum If there ARE sex diffs, women always seen as effect to be explained. It's "Why are women high in X?" not "Why are men LOW in X?" #aps2013dc
    17 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite
  • lindy2350 Nothing irks me more than a spokesman saying it's "my duty" to "direct people" to think/act a certain way. Does he know what journalism is?
    36 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite
  • melanietbaum Berdahl: It used to be you could see "sex" or "gender" in title & the main finding might be that there's no diff. Not anymore. #aps2013dc
    50 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite
More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Readers Respond to "Rational and Irrational Thought"--And More...: Scientific American Mind

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X