The annual Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting brings a wealth of scientific minds to the shores of Germany’s Lake Constance. Every summer at Lindau, dozens of Nobel Prize winners exchange ideas with hundreds of young researchers from around the world. Whereas the Nobelists are the marquee names, the younger contingent is an accomplished group in its own right. In advance of this year’s meeting, which focuses on physics, we are profiling several promising attendees under the age of 30. The profile below is the sixth in a series of 30.

Name: Laurence Perreault Levasseur
Age: 24
Born: Quebec City, Canada
Nationality: Canadian

Current position: Ph.D. student, University of Cambridge
Education: B.Sc. (Hons) and M.Sc. from McGill University

What is your field of research?
I am interested in early-universe cosmology, in particular in how the study of the earliest moments of the universe can give us a better insight about fundamental physics. My current research interests are focused on the mechanisms for generating the primordial fluctuations and on preheating/reheating. Recently I have also been interested in theories of modified gravity, such as Galileon theories, and their application to models of the early universe.

What drew you to physics, and to that research area in particular?
From as far back as I can remember, my favorite question of all has always been “why?”. An inextinguishable curiosity about the world around me, and a deep feeling of awe as I was discovering it, has always lived in me. I have always been fascinated by the mysteries of the universe, by the perfection and beauty of nature. Throughout my academic formation, I learnt that theoretical physics was the path I should take to seek answers to my questions. Very fast, my fascination for the origins of the universe and its enigmas have drawn me toward cosmology, in the hope of getting a deeper understanding of some of the most fundamental questions.

Where do you see yourself in 10 years?
I'd really love to have the opportunity to dedicate my time and energy to the branch of science that I am pursuing now. I'd like to be a full-time researcher at a research institution and be actively involved in research and also teaching. I also really hope that I can start an international program through which pure sciences could be spread to the parts of the world with less opportunities for such fields. I have started this path by taking part in a teaching abroad program this summer where I teach physics inflation and early universe cosmology to undergraduate students in developing parts of China. In the long term I hope I can motivate the scientific community to take united measures to actively spread and promote pure sciences to developing regions of the world.

Who are your scientific heroes?
Hubert Reeves has definitely had a lot of influence on me wanting to become a physicist during my teenage years. He is a now-retired nuclear physicist from Quebec who wrote a lot of popular science in French, and is very famous among French Canadians. Reading his books were definitely very inspiring and made me believe it was possible for someone like me to become a leader in science at the international level, if I was aiming far enough.

Marie Curie and Emmy Noether are also role models for me, first simply because they are females in a highly male-dominated field and opened many doors at a time when there were very few opportunities for women, and second because they are world-recognized experts who have had a gigantic impact in their respective fields and in science in a more general sense.

What activities outside of physics do you most enjoy?
I am an avid biker. I particularly like traveling with my bicycle, and usually I go for epic adventures. For my first journey, two of my friends and I went from Montreal to Florida in one month, for a total distance of about 3,000 kilometers, with nothing but three bicycles, a tent and camping material, little money, and a lot of enthusiasm. The year after I traveled in Italy for a summer school in Trieste and I brought my bike along. I went for day trips in Slovenia, and after the school I went from Bologna to Nice in France and back. Last year I went in biking in Belgium and Germany, and this year I will go around Portugal. My big and crazy dream is one day to travel from Paris to Beijing on my bike. We’ll see how that goes, and if I manage to do it before I turn 80 years old!

Apart from that, something a bit less extreme that I like to do is cooking. I love spending my Sunday afternoon making my own bread while listening to the radio (I am very old fashioned for that!), baking some banana cakes for my husband, preparing some good dishes for the week and trying lots of new recipes and tastes.

What do you hope to gain from this year’s Lindau meeting?
Throughout my career, I have learnt to appreciate the importance of collaboration in research, as well as the richness of international interactions. My first contact with advanced physics was through the International Summer School ISSYP (Perimeter Institute) in 2004, an experience through which I was exposed to first-class scientists and international researchers, giving me a chance to share my passion for science. This conference profoundly modeled my view of the scientific world.

Such conferences are precious opportunities for the larger scientific community to share cutting-edge scientific activities, discuss their vision and opinions about the general direction of the field, and make deep interpersonal connections which will lead to great long-term collaborations.

I have been privileged to have many opportunities to attend such conferences, which has resulted in productive international collaborations which I am a part of. From these unique exposures, I can assert how inspiring interactions with senior and fellow junior scientists are, which motivates me to attend the 2012 Lindau conference.

Are there any Nobelists whom you are particularly excited to meet or learn from at Lindau?
I am very excited to meet George Smoot and Brian Schmidt, because they are two cosmologists/astrophysicists/astronomers who have revolutionized the field of cosmology and contributed to shape it and define the questions we are striving to answer. I would really like to know their views on the future direction that this field of science should take in order to answer today’s fundamental questions in cosmology.

3 Comments

1. 1. And Then What? 08:50 PM 6/13/12

   I envy this young lady. She is just beginning her journey of discovery. My only advice to her would be to reserve a little bit of her time for “out of the box thinking”. Do your research and learn your trade but never, ever become a slave to it. Discovery comes from the Mind and its ability to assemble what it is presented with into a coherent picture. One of the most important abilities that any Scientist, or anyone else for that matter, can have is the ability to be ready to abandon what they and others have always taken to be the “Truth” and follow another path. It may lead to dead end, but unless you are willing to walk it you will never know. The worst that can happen is people will ridicule you and from my experience people will do that anyway for any variety of reasons. All that really matters in the end is your opinion of yourself and if you are comfortable with that you will never regret what you have done. And each time you believe you have all the answers ask yourself this simple question: “And Then What?” Anyway that is my advice, for what it is worth, from someone 40+ years older that her and, oh yes, above all else have fun with what you do because you only get one kick at the can.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

2. 2. andgrmt2 04:48 PM 6/28/12

   This is an inspiring interview. Firstly I respect and admire laurence's strength to pursue her childhood dream (studying fundamental cosmology). We all have dreams when we are younger but many of us give up on it at some point. It's very inspiring to hear stories of the ones who persist on their dream and achieve it. Second I am envious of the adventurous life she has on the side, long bike journeys, travelling to many places, studying the universe. I can also imagine that with all that sounds fascinating and admirable comes loads of difficulties, responsibilities, doubts and occasional defeats. At those moments remember that people like you are the beacons of human knowledge, culture and thought. It's only for the ensemble of all the little papers and small and big scientific works throughout centuries that we have succeeded in understanding the universe the way we do today and every contribution to it is a precious achievement. You also mentioned Marie Curie and it is true that unfortunately even in this century our society has not succeeded yet in equally motivating males and females in the scientific domain. The likes of you can certainly be strong roll models for many ambitious and talented young girls who will follow you.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

3. 3. dadster 02:20 PM 6/30/12

   Have you considered the possibility of life- energy originating along with electromagnetic energy , along with space and matter , as a findamental phenomena at the very beginning of the univesre formation otself and , not after other energies are formed , or a consequence of them as an emergent phenomena ? Going one step further, what about the consideration that cosmic awareness in the form of " information " was the origin of the electromagnetic four dimensional universe in which we are manifest ? "information " is the most fundamental entity in the universe and not atoms ,protons or nuclear energies or quarks or strings , havenyou considered that ? Of course the maths for it would be probability maths and no certainties but only determinate chaos , a maths which is now applicable to quantum electrodynamics . Of course life- scientists would have to invent their own mathematics and maths models to convince the physicists and for also the finders. If attempted life- scientists would prove themselves to be smarter than the physicists . A starting point for this could be considering the non- physical energies associated with mass , existing in regions beyond the extractable electromagnetic energies e = mc^2 ; I mean energies existing in the region e> mc^2 ( the region could be easily visible from the straight line. graph of e = mc^2 ( 'c' being a physical constant ).

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this