Liver Transplants Succeed without Blood Transfusions















Share on Tumblr

Jehovah's Witnesses refuse blood transfusions. This does not prevent them from contracting hepatitis C or other diseases that necessitate liver transplants. Surgeons have developed techniques--such as withdrawing up to 1,500 milliliters of the patient's own blood for reinfusion during the surgery--to deal with these religious strictures. And a new study of liver transplant patients seems to show that avoiding donated transfusions might be good for both blood banks and patients with no religious objections.

Nicolas Jabbour of the University of Southern California and his colleagues reviewed the outcomes of 272 liver transplant patients--who were neither children nor Jehovah's Witnesses--who underwent surgery between January 1997 and December 2004 at the University of Southern California-University Hospital in Los Angeles. The patients were divided into two groups: those from before and after January 2000. This was not an arbitrary date; rather it marks the start of USC surgeons using the transfusion-avoiding techniques in all patients. Although the bulk of patients studied came after that date--only 33 non-Jehovah's Witnesses received transplants prior--the new techniques showed that transfusions of donated blood significantly declined, saving both blood and money. Even the sickest patients required fewer transfusions; typical liver transplants required as many as 14 units of packed red blood cells in 1997 compared to roughly five by 2004.

"Blood can almost never be 100 percent safe," Jabbour and his colleagues write in the paper presenting the finding in the September issue of Archives of Surgery. "Despite the current conviction among physicians that blood products are safer than they used to be, there are reports of transfusion-related transmission of hepatitis C and [HIV] and emerging data of newer pathogens." The doctors also note that the more blood transfusions given, the more likely organ rejection and ultimate death. The Jehovah's Witnesses may have some trouble predicting the apocalypse, but their antitransfusion stance seems to have helped surgeons and their liver transplant patients.�



Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Liver Transplants Succeed without Blood Transfusions

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X