Human Malaria Parasite Arose from Gorillas, Not Chimps

Scientists had previously suspected that the most common human malaria parasite split from a chimpanzee version millions of years ago. New genetic analysis of primate droppings points to a more recent cross-species transmission event from gorillas















Share on Tumblr

Gorilla that might have the closest malaria parasite to that which infects humans

BLAME DROPPING: Genetic analysis of thousands of primate fecal samples provides a clearer picture of the natural history of the malaria parasite. Image: ISTOCKPHOTO/GLOBALIP

Although humans share most of their genes—and many analogous diseases—with chimpanzees, these close relatives are not likely to blame for the menace of human malaria, according to new genetic research.

Malaria kills some one million people worldwide each year and sickens another 350 million to 500 million. In recent years the origins of this disease, the most common and deadly form of which is from the protozoan parasite Plasmodium falciparum carried by the Anopheles mosquito, had been winnowed down to the chimpanzee.

But after a new molecular analysis of more than 2,500 primate droppings sampled in central Africa from primarily wild chimps (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), eastern gorillas (Gorilla beringei) and western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla), a team of researchers has concluded that the modern human P. falciparum has its closest correlates in a variety found in western gorillas, not chimpanzees.

"When we first saw it, it was a surprise," says Beatrice Hahn, a professor of medicine and microbiology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and co-author of the new paper, which was published online September 22 in Nature. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.)

Although the findings contradict a 2009 report published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences co-written by Nathan Wolfe, a visiting professor of human biology at Stanford University, he is excited about the results.* "It's nice to have higher resolution," he says. His group had not examined gorillas as a possible point of origin, and he notes that the new work "helps to push the field forward."

One bite
The new research proposes that the human P. falciparum malaria parasite variety emerged from a single cross-species transmission event.

This single-bite theory "would suggest that there is a hurdle to go from apes to humans," Hahn says. And because in many places humans and primates live in close proximity, a more easily crossed barrier would likely have given rise to novel human infections on multiple occasions, she explains.

But the findings do not rule out the possibility that less harmful primate varieties of Plasmodium are making their way into the human blood stream from time to time. "Are there transmissions going on on a lower level that we don't recognize?" Hahn asks. She suggests that many of these infections might have avoided detection because they do not infect other humans. And with standard clinical diagnostic practices, most of which are based on laboratory slide analysis, "you wouldn't be able to identify" great ape varieties of malaria, Wolfe points out. It is likely that most Plasmodium species "would look pretty similar" under the microscope, he says, noting that scientific studies typically rely on genetic analysis that provides a much higher level of species-specific detail.

New burdens
One of the big debates about the origins of malaria in recent years had been whether the parasite emerged in human populations—and then spread to great apes—or whether it had been in human and great ape lineages for eons, Wolfe says. The new paper "cements the great ape origin of human malaria," he says. But it throws a wrench in the time line of human malaria's origin.

"We really don't know how fast or slow Plasmodium parasites evolve," Hahn points out. Previous analyses of chimpanzee malaria parasite Plasmodium reichenowi had suggested the human variety P. falciparum likely split off some seven million to five million years ago. The new findings suggest that the human variety likely emerged less than 300,000 years ago (and possibly as recently as 5,000 years ago), she says.



4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. jtdwyer 12:45 AM 9/23/10

    I find it somewhat amazing that a population of about 100 cao vit gibbon survived the carpet bombing and Napalm deforestation of the 1960’s and early 1970’s. I wonder if they also took refuge underground, digging tunnels... At any rate it was apparently not as effective as reported by the military.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. MadMichaelJohn 06:55 PM 9/23/10

    More dragonflies, reduce the vector before it grows wings.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. jmonea 04:43 PM 9/30/10

    i have a Q: why did they make that idea of chimps giving us malaria.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. jmonea 04:44 PM 9/30/10

    this is so unpredictible people .

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Human Malaria Parasite Arose from Gorillas, Not Chimps

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X