This article was published in print as "Math Rules."
This article was originally published with the title Math Rules.
Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.
See Inside
Some equations touch all our lives--whereas others, well, not so much
This article was published in print as "Math Rules."
This article was originally published with the title Math Rules.
Steve Mirsky has been writing the Anti Gravity column since a typical tectonic plate was about 33 inches from its current location. He also hosts the Scientific American podcast Science Talk.
Deadline: Jul 15 2013
Reward: $5,000 USD
SciBX: Science-Business eXchange, a joint publication from the makers
Deadline: Jun 30 2013
Reward: $1,000,000 USD
This is a Reduction-to-Practice Challenge that requires written documentation and&
Powered By: 
10 Comments
Add Commentequations:
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWhat about the integral of e to the x power = function of u to the n power?
Related to the equation in the first comment, an oft-quoted equation while I was in college was
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this(M/F) + (3/4)Y = B
The B's, while few, have flourished over the decades.
-- Peter Norton, Reed College x65
story=3/17
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisHow many of the equations were actually revealed in your "review"
3/17 = 17.647058823529411764705882352941%, score for review.
Thumbs up! Take math out of the classrooms into the realm of 'fun'.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisMath classes are like piano lessons...destroy the inate eagerness of kids to be creative.
I remember one time we had university “ Physics Open House” and our Prof., who had a dry sense of humor, puts some equations on the board to make it look impressive to the public, and one in particular caught my eye. It was written out in scientific notation as: the integral of e to the power x = F of u to the power n. which of course makes no sense, except when it is translated into Sex=Fun.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thismy apologies sir it looks like we had the same prof.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThat's not the punchline. It's:
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this“The squaw on the hippopotamus is equal to the *sons* of the squaws on the other two hides.” (sons, not sums)
And that's nowhere near the worst joke in the history of science.
The HA inequality reminds me of the definition of a horse show:
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIt's a bunch of HA's showing their HA's to a bunch of HA's!
Not only is the punch line wrong, it is: "the sons of the s_____ on the hippopotamus are equal to the sons of the s_____ on the other two hides" but the word used for a Native American woman is offensive in the extreme, being the equivalent of calling a woman a c**t or a whore.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisJonniebean44 is correct. This is an offensive joke to native peoples. Stewart and Mirsky might not have known that, but their editors should have. The same situation occurred with Carol Higgins Clark, who titled her latest mystery Gypped. What are editors for, anyway, if they don't have some cultural sensitivity? [Note: this has nothing to do with "correctness", political or otherwise. It's an ethnic slur.]
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this