Mathematical Model May Provide Insight into How We Sense















Share on Tumblr

five senses

Image:

  • Gravity's Engines

    We’ve long understood black holes to be the points at which the universe as we know it comes to an end. Often billions of times more massive than the Sun, they...

    Read More »

The individual cells responsible for responding to sensory inputs--the strong scent of a flower, the light touch of a spring breeze--can cope with only a small amount of input. Yet the human ear can hear and process sounds ranging from a pin drop to the roar of a jet engine. Scientists have struggled to account for how this individually narrow range combines in a network to produce the wide range of sensed experience. Now physicists have shown how the mathematical models that describe phase transitions in physical systems might also explain our capacity to hear, see, smell, taste and touch.

Mauro Copelli of the Federal University of Pernambuco and Osame Kinouchi of the University of Sao Paulo in Brazil used a mathematical formula to show how a random network of "excitable elements," such as neurons or axons, have a collective response that is both exquisitely sensitive and broad in scope. When subtle stimuli hit the network, sensitivity is improved because of the ability of one neuron to excite its neighbor. When strong stimuli hit the network, the response is similarly strong, following what are known as power laws--mathematical relationships that do not vary with scale.

But although a mathematical model seems to fit a natural phenomenon it does not necessarily follow that the two are actually related, according to some scientists. In a paper published last September in BioEssays, Evelyn Fox Keller of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology explained that just because mathematical models help explain physical systems, like the density of a gas, it does not mean that they also apply to biological systems, even if they seem to fit. "Fitting available data to such distributions is suspiciously easy," she wrote. "Even when the fit is robust, it adds little if anything to our knowledge of the actual architecture of the network."

Time--and experiments--will tell. Copelli and Kinouchi point to one experiment that might prove or disprove their hypothesis. Tests of mice genetically engineered to lack a protein that facilitates electrical connections between cells have shown that they do not see as well. The Brazilian physicists predict that they will not hear as well either. The paper was published yesterday in Nature Physics.



2 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. rlanzara 08:47 PM 1/1/08

    Biological receptor responses are ultimately responsible for how we perceive the universe. For an understanding of how these receptors might work see - http://www.bio-balance.com/Weber's_Law.pdf and http://www.bio-balance.com/Anemone.pdf. This mathematical model is also useful to understand how our receptors function on a molecular level, see - http://www.bio-balance.com/JMGM_article.pdf and http://www.bio-balance.com/Receptor2.htm for a picture of these two receptor states.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. rlanzara 02:35 PM 7/31/08

    There occasionally occurs a paradigm shift in the way that particular problems are recognized and solved. It often takes years and even decades before these new ideas are incorporated into the prevailing scientific thought. One reasone for this may be because of the inability to effectively communicate those ideas to the rest of the world. When such paradigm shifts take hold and begin to grow, there's a critical point where the idea is tested by suitable independent experimental scientists. These are often the unsung heroes of newer scientific ideas and technologies breaking through to recognition and eventual acceptance. So far the links between physics and biology seem rather esoteric and remote, yet we all accept that we are physical beings subjected to the same physical laws that govern the universe around us. So why havent we made greater progress toward a more direct connection to our underlying physical relationship with the universe? Perhaps we have a resistance to such knowledge. We may not really want to know these things unless we can be more mentally and spiritually prepared to accept them. Not everyone may be able to accept the direct scientific evidence for these connections and not every mind is prepared to understand how these connections occur, but for those who wish to explore these connections consider the following link that may change the way that you view how physics meets biology - http://ombamltine.blogspot.com/2008/05/welcome.html

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Mathematical Model May Provide Insight into How We Sense

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X