MATTER AND ANTIMATTER annihilate each other on contact. Experiments hint at a subtle difference between them that may explain why antimatter is so rare.
Image: iStockPhoto
-
Gravity's Engines
We’ve long understood black holes to be the points at which the universe as we know it comes to an end. Often billions of times more massive than the Sun, they...
Read More »
Nature may have handed scientists a new clue in a longstanding mystery: how matter beat out antimatter for dominance of the universe. Early data from twin experiments at the Tevatron, the world's reigning particle accelerator at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) in Batavia, Ill., suggest an unexpected chink in the hugely successful standard model of particle physics.
The twist comes from odd behavior in a particle called the BS (pronounced "B-sub-S"), which flips back and forth between its matter and antimatter forms three trillions times per second. Researchers believe that such a breakdown, known as CP violation, is required to explain why matter is so abundant.
Researchers say the finding is well worth following up to make sure it is not a random clump in the data, as frequently happens in particle physics experiments. "This is exciting, definitely," says physicist Jacobo Konigsberg of the University of Florida in Gainesville, cospokesperson for CDF, one of two detectors that may have glimpsed the effect.
Antimatter is well-known to science fiction fans as the stuff that explodes on contact with regular particles such as protons and electrons, which have the same mass as their antiparticles but the opposite charge. The hot, early universe contained equal parts matter and antimatter. Yet somehow, as the cosmos cooled, matter was not completely annihilated.
Researchers strongly suspect that the key to this riddle lies in the weak nuclear force, which governs radioactive decay, along with more exotic reactions created in particle accelerators. In nearly all cases, matter obeys something called CP symmetry, which states that a particle ought to behave identically to the mirror image of its antiparticle. Not so when acted on by the weak nuclear force.
The amount of CP violation observed in experiments (and enshrined in the standard model), however, is far too little to explain why matter should have prevailed in its ancient war with antimatter. To get a clean look at CP symmetry, DZero and its sibling detector, CDF, focus on the BS, which consists of a bottom quark and a strange antiquark. (Quarks are components of protons and neutrons.) Working independently, the two detectors both found an extra dose of CP violation beyond what the standard model predicts.
Neither result on its own was very convincing, so a team of European researchers combined the data, similar to the way medical researchers cull information from independent clinical trials, to look for rare side effects. Together, the data make it 99.7 percent likely that the discrepancy is real, not due to chance, says physicist Luca Silvestrini of the National Institute for Nuclear Physics in Rome, who took part in the study submitted to Physical Review Letters.
Such analyses require making judgment calls, but Silvestrini says he is confident in the finding. "Everything points in the same direction, and so I think it's rather unlikely this is a statistical fluke," he says. Konigsberg says that if it is a fluke, that should become clear by the end of the summer as the Fermilab teams analyze more data.
Whether the hypothetical CP violation would fully explain matter's dominance over antimatter depends on the new physics that gave rise to it. According to theoretical physicist Robert Fleischer of CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research in Geneva, Switzerland, the simplest explanation would be a massive, photonlike particle similar to known members of the standard model and capable of interacting directly with bottom quarks and strange antiquarks.
See what we're tweeting about
9 Comments
Add CommentJust like Johannes Kepler's observations; nature comes up with unpredicted nuances that don't always follow disciplined models. The unexpected is always there, that's why I find things like this so fascinating.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWonder if we could use the B sub S for Quantum computing. Since it flips states about 3 TRILLION times a second!!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisMaybe, the so-called matter-antimatter asymmetry in the Universe is more a debatable issue than a plausible hypothesis.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAt least, this is the thesis put forward recently in preprint 0803.2445 at the arxive.
Spectral Hbar-signatures can indeed be detected in the dihydrogen band spectrum, available for about a century but are persistently being ignored by the physics community.
If Antimatter had emerged dominant, would we still have called it 'Antimatter'?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWould we be here to say it?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisB sub s is only compliant in systems where a third pull from a ninety degree angle from the original two matter/antimatter stream lie. If there is no third pull, the first two breakdown.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisPlacing the matter and antimatter across from each other isn't enough. There is a third that pulls and separates them. With out a third, they will conjoin like two magnets feeling their way into a lock, and disappear...
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisImagine a key understanding has yet to be exposed, such as the proposal that all matter and antimater, the underlying fliud mosic of all particles, consists of bound gravitational waves (particles) that decay into monopole waves and it is the constructive and destructive wave interferences that create the effects of gravity, relative time and space, etc. and the lopsided state of the composition of the universe as matter vs antimater. Imagine the universe acceleratelying expanding as a simple function of F=M x A where F is essentially constant, because gravity doesn't pull it synchronizes, and Mass is decreasing as it decays into the gravitational wave. Imagine that the Huygens' principle missing component is this kickback of constructive alignment of matter through the path of least resistance as all matter decays into the gravitational wave and that this constructive interference alignment or
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisREAD BALLOON INSIDE BALLOON THEORY OF MATTER AND ANTIMATTER UNIVERSES ON OPPOSITE ENTROPY PATH PUBLISHED BY DURGADAS DATTA IN YEAR 2002. HIS ETHER=GRAVITY=DARK ENERGY THEORY EXPLAIN PRESENT DAY OBSERVATIONS/
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this