Cover Image: September 2012 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

The Age of Discovery: What Would You Study If You Lived Forever? [Poll]

Leading scientists answer that question in Scientific American. Cast your vote for the best proposal and suggest ideas of your own















Share on Tumblr

Many research questions cannot be answered in the course of a single lifetime. Davide Castelvecchi, a contributing editor for Scientific American, has long-wondered what scientists would study if they could live for hundreds or thousands of years—or even indefinitely. Recently he put the question to leading investigators in their fields, reporting on their replies in "Questions for the Next Million Years," in our September 2012 issue.

A summary of the replies appears below. Which idea do you like best? Vote for one below. You can compare your answer with those of other voters here.

We'd also like to hear your ideas for other studies that would need centuries or more to carry out. Post your thoughts in the comments section below.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.
Rights & Permissions

7 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. garion501 08:35 AM 9/5/12

    Faster than Light travel,or Travel at near the speed of light

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. dicklipke 09:00 AM 9/5/12

    A person would have to lack all emotions and compassion because while making this valued study everyone else around them would continue to get old or sick and die.The lack of concern of what is happening to the environment and the planet probably would be of no concern knowing full well you will live for ever anyway.
    It would be a interesting study in its self in finding such a person or persons that would require these characteristics to even start such a study.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. scribblerlarry 09:23 AM 9/5/12

    Presuming that you really meant "Forever", I'd study all of it, of course. And even then I'd run out of things to study before "forever" was over....

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Gatnos 11:29 AM 9/5/12

    How can anyone vote for any of those ridiculous answers? None of them would advance humanity.

    I could have voted for something along the line of discovering the mathematics proving the Grand Unification theory. I could have voted for something along the lines of eradicating all diseases. I could have voted for discovering how to stop/prevent aging. Then there is the invention of the matter transporter, which can also be used to manufacture anything from food to fuel from its basic elements. For that matter, any and all of those wonderful gadgets that have captured our imagination on the Star Trek series.

    But then if I were to live forever, I think I would go about finding God.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. yevoc 02:15 PM 9/5/12

    Terrible answers. None of the above. This is all I would do for thousands of years?

    I may be immortal, but I'm not going to collect mindless data forever. Might as well build some robot/software to handle this data collection/measuring for me while I instead become a master of all fields in order to...

    Grow better food with extreme efficiency
    Create faster networks/server farms with lower power consumption
    Build true artificial intelligence
    Make video games that educate as well as entertain
    Create a space elevator and/or laser-powered spacecraft
    Work on asteroid mining
    Obtain solar power from Mercury high orbit just from a do-it-yourself project (eventually high Sol orbit)
    Build safe brain implants/interfaces
    Create self-replicating (and reprogrammable) nanotechnology

    etc etc.

    The list of things to do doesn't change with immortality. You just get to do them all instead of 1 or 2 before death.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. Cramer in reply to yevoc 05:18 PM 9/5/12

    Yevoc,
    You seemed to have misunderstood the question. The question was not what technological advances would you attempt to develop? It was "what would you study?" That is, what long-term experiment would you undertake to discover something?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. live.the.future 06:49 PM 9/5/12

    Well given about 10^65 years or so one could observe black hole evaporation via Hawking radiation.

    A million years might be enough to get some sense of whether protons decay, but to be really sure you'd want about 10^35 years or so, then it should become readily apparent (assuming you can find much matter at that point, given the universe's expansion).

    On a shorter timescale (mere millions of years), one could observe continental drift and, hopefully, come up with some pretty darned accurate models for future drift.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

The Age of Discovery: What Would You Study If You Lived Forever? [Poll]: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X