If the two features are indeed related, the jets must have been much more robust at some point in the past to provide the energy that carved the Fermi bubbles out of intergalactic space. And, in turn, the black hole must have been much more voracious as well. "It didn't get to be four [million] or five million solar masses by never doing anything," Finkbeiner says. "At some time in the past it was consuming large amounts of material and making a mess of things."



See what we're tweeting about






10 Comments
Add CommentThe universe are in change.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe black holes are ine big mysterius!
If someone read the Stephen Hawking theorys about this. I think this holes have one type of magnetic energy who "eat, eat, eat" the lights, of anorthers stars, planets.
I say this because this old stars when your life is in the end, she explod and have one type energy who the light or the more fast light cannot escape.
In our galaxie maybe have one black hole like this. Someone have doubs?
Unfortunately our technology is obsolete.
The article states:
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this"The so-called Fermi bubbles and the jets may stem from the same outburst a million or so years ago—the jets would be the high-velocity black-hole output, and the bubbles the decelerated material spreading outward in a series of shocks and eddies. But whereas the jets and bubbles overlap in location and scale, the jets are tilted by about 15 degrees, and the researchers note that they could result from separate episodes."
I suggest that, more likely, the position of the bubbles is determined by the magnetic or gravitational polar orientation of the energized free electrons to the galaxy's disk, whereas the positions of trace gamma rays once produced by active relativistic jets is determined by the position of the supermassive black hole's magnetic field directing the jets.
In this case, free electrons stripped from matter accelerated by its accretion towards the SMBH (somewhat similarly to electrons being stripped away from nucleons during the collapse of a neutron star) were initially ejected but were captured by the galaxy's magnetic and/or gravitational fields. The bubbles of free electrons were excited by the then AGN's relativistic jets emitting elementary particle residue produced by the continued decomposition of nucleons, somewhat similar to the conditions produced by the LHC except their elementary particle residue is not localized by head-on collision, producing immediate decay: it continues at relativistic velocities, producing a long lived stream of high energy fundamental particles.
This decomposition of matter could allow the local retention of its singularly directed gravitational energy without retaining the spatial occupancy required by its now ejected dimensional particles. In this way an effective gravitational singularity could be produced without requiring any spatial occupancy for local storage of dimensional matter.
newman:
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIs the title of your poem, 'Ode to all back hole in galaxie'? It's quite interesting. I feel that while the rhythm and meter varies, this narrative progresses through its stanzas with definite enjambment. Minimal use of clichés, metaphor and personification enhance the realism of this blank verse.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisMany astrophysical systems have highly collimated back-to-back jets emanating from their cores. For example, gamma-ray burst sources, pulsars, Haro-Herbig systems, black holes, quasars, BL Lac galaxies, radio galaxies, Seyfert galaxies, elliptical galaxies and spiral galaxies.
In most well-observed cases the jets are generated by an ultracompact and highly relativistic core object, most often a black hole.
How then do we understand the jets observed in supernovae, brown dwarf stars, proto-stars, and young stellar objects? Is it possible that ultracompact "nuclei" lurk semi-anonymously in these systems too? Might not all major classes of stellar and galactic systems be nucleated by ultracompact relativistic "nuclei"?
Since this is the case with atomic scale systems, Discrete Scale Relativity predicts that it is also true for stellar and galactic scale systems.
Robert L. Oldershaw
http://www3.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw
Discrete Scale Relativity
Fractal Cosmology
Are you seriously suggesting the existence of atomic
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisscale accretion disks and relativistic jets? What would
they be?
I'm not a poet, perhaps a visionary.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI see black holes as a great mystery of the universe.
They contain a kind of energy that devours everything.
In our galaxy there is evidence that small black holes.
Nobody knows, nobody study because we do not have enough technology to study it.
Because of this there is so much fantasy in it. Read Stephen Hawking and his theory of wormholes (black holes).
My colleagues share the same opinion.
Goodbye.
I do agree
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWith the mystery
Of beautiful black holes
Matter and energy
Devoured
I would have enjoyed Matson's piece more if he had stayed away from mythopoetic/anthropomorphic nonsense about sleeping giants awaking and devouring stuff, etc. (the metaphor "black hole" is bad enough)
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisSurely the universe is sufficiently amazing without "improving" on it with feeble human projections.
What if we can pinpoint changes within DNA (for example, 'substitutions, deletes, and insertions'), with chronologically confirmed galactic events?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisMaybe these jet-plumes happened on Galactic Garbage Day and the truck ain't been by yet?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this